Ang pagtatanggol sa Biblia at pagsang ayon sa parusang kamatayan ay hindi magkatugma, kaya nga hindi ko ipinagtatanggol ang Biblia, tinutuligsa ko ang mga hindi pagkakatugma nito, matutulungan mo ba ako

Ang parusang kamatayan ay hindi tugma sa Kristiyanismo, kaya naman hindi ako Kristiyano.
Ang pagtatanggol sa Bibliya at pagiging pabor sa parusang kamatayan ay hindi tugma, kaya nga hindi ko ipinagtatanggol ang Bibliya, tinutuligsa ko ang mga hindi pagkakatugma nito, maaari mo ba akong tulungan?
Ilang taon na ang nakalilipas, nakakita ako ng isang balita na nangyari sa Brazil, dalawang babae ang pumatay sa isang 9 na taong gulang na batang lalaki, si Rhuan Maycon:
(https://sputniknews.lat/20190621/asesinato-nino-rhuan-juan-brasil-ideologia-genero-1087731520.html
https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asesinato_de_Rhuan_da_Silva
)

Gusto ko sana ng death penalty para sa mga mamamatay-tao, kaya ilang taon na ang nakalipas, nag-upload ako ng video na pinamagatang: Pabor ang Kristiyanismo sa parusang kamatayan – The Case of Rhuan Maycon.
( https://144k.xyz/2023/10/20/no-soy-cristiano-porque-el-tipico-lider-cristiano-dice-basar-su-fe-en-la-biblia-y-entre-los -que-aman-la-biblia-se-encuentran-pastores-y-curas-violadores-de-ninos-solo-gente-asi-podria-amar-la-impuni/ )

Pero kailangan kong linawin na kapag sinabi mong Kristiyano ka, iniuugnay ka agad nila sa pagiging tagapagtanggol ng Bibliya, kung ganyang uri ng Kristiyano ang tinutukoy natin, hindi ako Kristiyano, ang tinutukoy ko ay tunay na Kristiyanismo, ang isa na hindi batay sa Bibliya, ngunit dahil walang nakakaalam nito, kung gayon sasabihin ko:

Hindi ako Kristiyano dahil sinasabi ng tipikal na lider ng Kristiyano na ibinase niya ang kanyang pananampalataya sa Bibliya, at sa mga nagmamahal sa Bibliya ay may mga pastor at pari na nanggagahasa ng mga bata,
tanging mga taong tulad ng mga iyon ang maaaring magmahal sa kawalan ng parusa para sa kanilang sariling mga krimen,
Tinutukoy ko ang hindi legal na parusa na itinuturing kong tanging angkop na parusa para sa gayong kasamaan:
ang parusang kamatayan.
Ito ay isang impunity batay sa paggalang sa ilang bansa,
Ang bansang iyon ay maliit sa teritoryo, ngunit hindi maliit sa impluwensya,
Ang bansang iyon ay may mga embahada sa iba’t ibang bansa sa mundo,
Ang bansang iyon ay may dilaw at puting banner,
Habang ang Ceasar ng imperyong Romano ay may mga barya na may larawan ang kanyang mukha,
ang bansang iyon ay gumagawa ng mga barya na may mga larawan ng mga mukha ng mga pinakamataas na pinuno nito,
at ang bansang iyon ay ang Vatican,
na ang pangunahing aklat, ang Bibliya,
naglalaman ng isang walang katotohanan na doktrina mula sa isang mahabang buhok na lalaki na tinatawag nilang “Their savior”,
doktrina na nagsasabing:
“Ibigin mo ang iyong kaaway, sapagkat sinasabi ko na ang kautusan: mata sa mata, ngipin sa ngipin at buhay sa buhay, ay hindi na nangangahulugan ng katarungan.”,
Sasabihin ba nila sa mga biktima ng sekswal na pang-aabuso na mahalin ang kanilang mga rapist?
Ang bawat isa ay nagtatanggol sa kanyang sariling mga tao, tama ba?,
Kung si Michael ay nasa panig ng mabubuting tao,

Sino ang Demonyo sa panig ng?,
Sino ang magtatanggol sa gayong kasuklam-suklam na mga tao kundi ang Diyablo mismo?
Kung ang Diyablo ay may mga anak,
Kung may mga taong akma sa profile ng anak ng Diyablo,
Hindi ba’t ang Diyablo lamang ang interesadong iligtas sila mula sa isang makatarungang parusa?

Hindi ba ang Diyablo lamang ang napinsala ng hustisya?
Naniniwala ako na ang Diyos ay umiiral at siya ay makatarungan, ang doktrina ng mata sa mata, ngipin sa ngipin at buhay para sa buhay ay tila sa akin ay isang makatarungang doktrina hanggang sa ang aggressor ay nagpasimula nito nang walang katwiran.
Ang Diyablo lamang ang makakalaban sa Diyos.
Ang Kristo na sinusunod ng mga tumatawag sa kanilang sarili na mga Kristiyano ay ang diyablo dahil sinasalungat niya ang hustisya ng Diyos.
Ako ay isang tao na nagnanais ng legal na parusang kamatayan para sa mga rapist, extortionist, mamamatay-tao, manloloko, kidnapper, at mga naghahanap ng kamatayan ng mga inosenteng tao sa pamamagitan ng paninirang-puri;
hindi magkatugma ang pagnanais ng katarungan at pagiging tagapagtanggol ng Bibliya.

Hindi karapat-dapat na maging isang Kristiyano dahil ang Kristiyanismo ay batay sa Bibliya, at ang Bibliya ay batay sa mga kasinungalingan ng Roma.

Maaari bang maging tupa ang lobo?,
Ang mga ligaw na tupa bang lobo?,
Sinabi ng mga lobo ng Roma na mahal ng pastol ang mga lobo.
Ang mga lobo sa damit ng tupa ay nagsasabi:
“At ayon sa sagradong aklat na ito, mayroong sumusunod na utos: Mga tupa, ibigin mo ang lobo, ang iyong kaaway, at pakainin mo siya ng iyong laman at dugo. (Mateo 5:38).”
Sinabi ng Diyablo sa kanyang pagod na mga tagasunod na kung susundin nila ang kanyang utos na maglakad ng dalawang milya sa halip na isa, sila ay magpapahinga. ( Mateo 11:28, Mateo 5:41 )

Can you conceive of the lion of Judah sharing food, including pork, at a table with Antiochus IV Epiphanes, that king who wanted to Hellenize the faith of the Jews and killed some of them for refusing to eat pork?

Terrible, as bad as the willing ignorance of many millions of proud supporters of priests and pastors.

“That if thou shalt confess with thy mouth the Lord Jesus, and shalt believe in thine heart that God hath raised him from the dead, thou shalt be saved.” -Romans 10:9

Jesus did not even resurrect at the third day!.

Many quote Romans 10:9 as a kind of mantra with which they feel secure from receiving a proper punishment, I enjoy destroying the deceit:

It does not work that way, it is not enough to confess sins, it is mandatory to stop sinning: Matthew 7:22 Many will say to me on that day, ‘Lord, Lord, did we not prophesy in your name and in your name drive out demons and in your name perform many miracles?’ 23 Then I will tell them plainly, ‘I never knew you. Away from me, you evildoers!’. Trusting every word in the Bible isn’t either the way to salvation, for example in the prophecy related to Matthew 7:22, it reads that he hates his enemies, in consequence the love for the enemies doctrine is not his: Psalms 139:19 If only you, God, would slay the wicked! Away from me, you who are bloodthirsty! 20 They speak of you with evil intent; your adversaries misuse your name. 21 Do I not hate those who hate you, Lord, and abhor those who are in rebellion against you? 22 I have nothing but hatred for them; I count them my enemies.

Jesus preached the Lord (Jehovah) as the only God and savior to worship, as the only one to direct prayers to; When Jesus was dying on the cross his enemies’ words show that he preached not himself, but Jehovah as the savior: Psalms 22:7 All who see me mock me; they hurl insults, shaking their heads. 8 “He trusts in Jehovah,” they say, “let the Lord rescue him. But what the Roman Empire has done is terrible:

They showed a different Christ and a different gospel and made that official in the Bible, the cult for creature was on their minds:

Matthew 27:42 “He saved others,” they said, “but he can’t save himself! He’s the king of Israel! Let him come down now from the cross, and we will believe in him.

They have said that salvation is through worshipping a long haired man, who resembles a pagan god named Zeus, that people must accept him as the only savior. The Romans have Hellenized the gospel. The Roman persecutors have never converted to the faith of Jesus, but they have hid, destroyed and adulterated the messages of his faith.

That long haired god is Satan (there are many Satans, (slandereres)), his religion is what the world calls “christianity”, I will explain:

Defending the Bible and being in favor of the death penalty is incompatible, that is why I do not defend the Bible, I denounce its inconsistencies, can you help me?
Years ago I saw a news story that happened in Brazil, two women murdered a 9-year-old boy, Rhuan Maycon: https://sputniknews.lat/20190621/asesinato-nino-rhuan-juan-brasil-ideologia-genero-1087731520. html – https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asesinato_de_Rhuan_da_Silva

I would have wanted the death penalty for these murderers, that’s why years ago, I uploaded a video titled: Christianity is in favor of the death penalty – The Case of Rhuan Maycon.

But I must clarify that when you say you are a Christian, they immediately associate you with being a defender of the Bible, if we are referring to that type of Christian, then I am not a Christian, I was referring to true Christianity, the one that was not based on Bible, but since no one knows it, then I say:

I am not a Christian because the typical Christian leader claims to base his faith on the Bible, and among those who love the Bible there are pastors and priests who rape children,
only people like that could love impunity for their own crimes,
I am referring to the non-legality of punishment that I consider to be the only appropriate punishment for such evil:
the death penalty.

It is an impunity based on respect for certian country,
That country is small in territory, but not small in influece,
That contry has embassies in various countries of the world,
That country has a yellow and white banner,
As the Ceasar of the Roman empire had coins with the image his face,
that country mint coins with images of the faces of their supreme leaders.
and that country is the Vatican,
whose main book, the Bible,
contains an absurd doctrine from whom they call “Their savior”,
doctrine which says:
“Love your enemy, because an eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth stopped being justice with my arrival”,
Will they tell victims of sexual abuse to love their rapists?

Each one defends his own people, right?,

If Michael is on the side of the good people,

Who is the Devil on the side of?,

Who would defend such despicable people but the Devil himself?

If the Devil had children,
If there were people who fit the profile of the Devil’s son,
Wouldn’t the Devil be the only one interested in saving them from a just punishment?

Wouldn’t the Devil be the only one damaged by justice?

I believe that God exists and that he is just, the doctrine of an eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth and life for life seems to me to be a just doctrine to the extent that the aggressor initiates it without justification.
Only the Devil could oppose God.
The Christ that those who call themselves Christians follow is the devil because he opposes the justice of God.

I am a man who wants the legalized death penalty for rapists, extortionists, murderers, swindlers, kidnappers, and those who seek the death of innocent people through slander;
desiring that and being a defender of the Bible are incompatible.

It is not worth becoming a Christian because Christianity is based on the Bible, and the Bible is based on Roman lies.

Revelation 12:7-12 Then war broke out in heaven. Michael and his angels fought against the dragon, and the dragon and his angels fought back.

And because the army of Michael has prevailed:

12 Therefore rejoice, you heavens
and you who dwell in them!
But woe to the earth and the sea,
because the devil has gone down to you!
He is filled with fury,
because he knows that his time is short.”

Deuteronomy 32:43 “Rejoice with him, O heavens;
bow down to him, all gods, for he avenges the blood of his children
and takes vengeance on his adversaries.
He repays those who hate him
and cleanses his people’s land.”

44 Moses came and recited all the words of this song in the hearing of the people, he and Joshua the son of Nun.

Damn dirty ape, can you understand me?

I will show you a lie which is a drop in a sea of lies in the Bible; but before: In a single image, in the one below, I tell you what motivates me to create these articles.

Real Case: Abel vs. Caina: The just man versus the slanderous woman (A)

I expose the Roman lies in the Bible because at my ignorance I followed bad Roman advice in the Bible which made me sin and fall at the feet of a slanderous and treacherous woman.

My words instants before the three coward men, friends of Sandra Bazan, began to attack me with kicks and stones, in front of her, when she had slandered me accusing me falsely of sexual harassment (1998): (C )

I answered: “What? No, I am not harassing her, it is not harassing, in my letter I ask her:” Sandra, what do you want from me? I did all this for you, but you call me, you tell me to look for you and when I look for you, you reject me and insult me (but I pray for you because the Bible says … “thanks for your ‘wise’ advice, Satan!! (I am being ironic)”),

what happens to you? What do you want from me? Do you love me inside and act that way because this is my ex’s witchcraft.

Do you act this way because you have entered a sect? Are you making fun of me? Tell me what’s wrong! “, That’s not harassment. (D)

https://ntiend.me/2023/02/21/roman-myths-in-the-bible-judas-iscariot-the-traitor-never-existed/

Notice Stephen’s attitude moments before he was killed as the Bible says, read how he addressed those he considered wicked:

Acts 7:51 Stiff-necked, and uncircumcised in heart and hearing. You always resist the Holy Spirit; Like your parents, so do you. 52 Which of the prophets did your fathers not persecute? And they slew those who foretold the coming of the Righteous One, of whom you have now been betrayers and slayers;

His attitude against the wicked is in harmony with the proverb that says the righteous hate the wicked: Proverbs 29:27.

The fact that Stephen was stoned by the wicked confirms what that proverb also says: The wicked hate the righteous.

But in his agony, something that doesn’t fit happens, suddenly Stephen, from behaving like an aggressive lion against the wicked, behaves like a meek kitten with the wicked, and that doesn’t make sense, it doesn’t make any sense:

Stephen’s death and his sudden change of attitude makes the narrative hardly believable.
Acts 7:58 And they stoned Stephen, while he cried out, and said, Lord, hold them not to account for this sin. And having said this, he died.
A very strange change of attitude for someone who moments before had spoken firmly and hatefully to his enemies.

Now read this:
Revelation 6:9-10 Those who had been put to death for the word of God and for their testimony cried with a loud voice, saying, How long, O Lord, holy and true, dost thou not judge and avenge our blood on them that dwell on the earth?
Stephen is supposed to be one of them, but here he is not seen interceding for them to be forgiven for killing him.

This contradiction is not a symptom of the fact that you, who agree with me and I, do not understand the scriptures as the defenders of the Bible would say, this is not an “apparent contradiction”, as they would say. The contradiction is real and is symptomatic of a Roman fraud in the Bible. It also makes no sense for St. Stephen to address a creature and not God in his last prayer, but that is another fraud that I have removed from Acts 7:58 to focus on the feelings of the saints toward those who killed them. Proverbs 29:27 says that the righteous hate the wicked, the prophecy in Psalm 58:10 confirms those feelings, contrasting Matthew 5:38 with Revelation 6:9 demonstrates based on logic, that the Bible does not deserve the credit that many rulers of various countries of the world give it by swearing with their hand on the Bible when assuming their public offices.

Everything becomes so untrustworthy that it is worth asking, did Stephen argue with Jews or with Romans?, did the Jews stone him or did the Romans stone him but the Romans blamed the Jews?, even: did Stephen really exist?, the Jews did not eat pork, but oh what a coincidence, in Matthew 15:11 the Bible says that Jesus said: they can eat everything, that doesn’t square with the prophecies of Isaiah in the last chapter of the book Isaiah. Do you realize the anti-Jewish tone of the Bible? It has texts from Judaism, but they are denied in its false New Testament.

Now read this:
Revelation 6:9-10 Those who had been put to death for the word of God and for their testimony cried with a loud voice, saying, How long, O Lord, holy and true, dost thou not judge and avenge our blood on them that dwell on the earth?
Stephen is supposed to be one of them, but here he wants to be avenged, he wants the sin of those who murdered him to be taken into account.

Can you conceive of the lion of Judah sharing food, including pork, at a table with Antiochus IV Epiphanes, that king who wanted to Hellenize the faith of the Jews and killed some of them for refusing to eat pork?

Michael says to Samael: “If you are a wolf, then I am a lion!”.

Can you conceive of him saying: “His wickedness is forgiven because he accepted me as his only savior and lord, and because he believed me when I said “eat everything because I am above the law: Deuteronomy 14 and Leviticus 11 are part of the past”, because he believes me when I said: “No to justified revenge, love your enemy because Numbers 35:33 is also part of the past, it is a commandment that stopped being justice with my arrival”, “Eat everything because my “words weigh more than the words of the prophet Isaiah (Isaiah 65, Isaiah 66).”

It does not make sense that the Lion of Judah is that man with long hair who looks like the Greek god Zeus, the god of Antiochus IV of Epiphanes, and that he also said: “Nothing that enters a man’s mouth contaminates him” (Matthew 15:11), because that is an insult to the faith of those seven brothers and their mother, who for love of God’s law regarding forbidden foods were martyred by that Greek king, those martyrs had faith in that by dying for the laws of their God, they would live again to inherit eternal life. Let us remember that those Jews did not want to adopt Greek customs (2 Maccabees 7), but the Romans could get along with such customs, which is why you have what you find in the Bible: myths and Hellenism contradicting Jewish truths: a terrible graft.

 “Para la bruja, sin amor.” (No facturo con mi canción pero la disfruto). https://youtu.be/-ofhLE4WkoI

 Mitos bíblicos: Esteban es apedreado: Testimonios falsos en la muerte de Esteban por apedreamiento. https://youtu.be/o8zdXT63zjw

 El águila de Jehová destruye a la serpiente antigua. Jehovah’s eagle destroys the ancient serpent. https://youtu.be/FSYyE1hNxd0

 El evangelio de Felipe vers. 13 Los arcontes y su engaño con los nombres – Evangelios Apócrifos. https://youtu.be/4V5WpRysAHc

 La verdad sobre la virgen que jamás te la dirá ni la iglesia católica ni su hermana la evangélica https://youtu.be/AG2IGJTpRyQ

 La profecía que dice: “caerán mil a tu lado o diez mil a tu lado pero tu no caerás.” https://youtu.be/vfQKkiHIspQ

Riddle, what are we talking about?: From the moment you are born they are already accusing you saying: «He was born with original sin and he needs to be baptized.» When your parents take you to their church there they teach you to beat your chest saying this: «I confess that I have sinned and I also confess that it is my fault, my great fault.» If you have enemies who attack you, they tell you: «If you want to be forgiven for your sins, forgive your enemies, remember that we are all sinners.«. If you transgress the doctrines of that church, they call you a sinner and tell you that you transgress God’s rules, I understand that God is an uncreated being and is superior; If justice is a higher value, would God be in favor of condemning the innocent along with the guilty?, That church is the remnant of an empire that persecuted a group of people who respected justice, the Roman empire was a empire that destroyed the scriptures of the faith that it persecuted, however they tell you that that empire converted to the faith that it persecuted and that it began to preach the messages that it persecuted, and they also tell you that in the Bible that they have accepted there are the messages that they persecuted but that they later dedicated themselves to defending, I ask you, do you believe them?, Do they seem trustworthy to you?, If you are righteous, why should you join a group of people whose conscience does accuse them of being unrighteous?, If you are righteous, the best thing you can do is not to carry in your shoulders the blame of others, it is not in your best interest to carry the burden of those unjust who do injustice but who believe that they will be forgiven for following rules handed down from other unjust people and for spreading their lies. Answer: We are talking about the religion of the Devil, the one whom the Romans of the past have worshiped: Man, Zeus, the sun (Triumvirate of the Romans). Among the Romans, Sol Invictus was worshiped, the «Sun Invincible», whose festival was celebrated on the occasion of the solstice of winter on December 25, when, it was believed, it was the coldest night long and, from then on, the sun began to rise again. Exodus 20:5 You shall not bow down to any image to honor it, I am Yahweh your God, a jealous God who hates those who hate him and loves those who love him. Yahweh does not love his enemies: Matthew 5:38-48 is a lie of the Roman beast empire, that empire did not respected neither the commandment, nor the message, nor the physical appearance of Christ: they defamed him with the image of «a Sun made man», in order to continue the idolatry to images of the Sun that the Roman Empire already worshiped when they killed him.

The Roman Empire desecrated the Sabbath with the excuse that Jesus was resurrected on Sunday, which is also not true. They have even lied about it because Jesus was never resurrected on the third day, since in the parable of the wicked tenants in Matthew 21:33-44, Jesus himself makes reference to a prophecy relating to his return, that prophecy is found in Psalm 118:5-25, and the events narrated there are not only incompatible with love for the enemies doctrine, they are also incompatible with the experiences of a man descending from heaven among the clouds; he lives on earth and is rebuked by God on earth, evidently because he sins, evidently because he is ignorant at first, evidently because he reincarnates with no memory of his past life, and he reincarnates in the third millennium after his death on the cross (Psalm 22:16-18, Hosea 6:1-3).