עונש מוות אינו תואם את הנצרות, וזו הסיבה שאני לא נוצרי.
להגן על התנ”ך ולהיות בעד עונש מוות זה לא תואם, זו הסיבה שאני לא מגן על התנ”ך, אני מגנה את חוסר העקביות שלו, אתה יכול לעזור לי?
לפני שנים ראיתי סיפור חדשותי שקרה בברזיל, שתי נשים רצחו ילד בן 9, Rhuan Maycon:
(https://sputniknews.lat/20190621/asesinato-nino-rhuan-juan-brasil-ideologia-genero-1087731520.html
https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asesinato_de_Rhuan_da_Silva
)
הייתי רוצה עונש מוות לרוצחים האלה, לכן לפני שנים העליתי סרטון שכותרתו: הנצרות בעד עונש המוות – המקרה של Rhuan Maycon.
( https://144k.xyz/2023/10/20/no-soy-cristiano-porque-el-tipico-lider-cristiano-dice-basar-su-fe-en-la-biblia-y-entre-los -que-aman-la-biblia-se-encuentran-pastores-y-curas-violadores-de-ninos-solo-gente-asi-podria-amar-la-impuni/)
אבל אני חייב להבהיר שכשאתה אומר שאתה נוצרי, הם מיד מקשרים אותך להיות מגן התנ”ך, אם אנחנו מתכוונים לסוג הזה של נוצרים, אז אני לא נוצרי, התכוונתי לנצרות אמיתית, אחד שלא היה מבוסס על התנ”ך, אבל מכיוון שאף אחד לא יודע אותו, אז אני אומר:
אני לא נוצרי כי המנהיג הנוצרי הטיפוסי טוען שהוא מבסס את אמונתו על התנ”ך, ובין אלה שאוהבים את התנ”ך יש כמרים וכמרים שאונסים ילדים,
רק אנשים כמו אלה שאפשר לאהוב את היעדר העונש על הפשעים שלהם,
אני מתכוון לאי חוקיות הענישה שלדעתי היא העונש המתאים היחיד לרוע כזה:
עונש המוות.
זה פטור מעונש המבוסס על כבוד למדינה מסוימת,
המדינה הזו קטנה בשטח, אבל לא קטנה בהשפעה,
לאותה מדינה יש שגרירויות במדינות שונות בעולם,
למדינה ההיא יש דגל צהוב לבן,
כמו לקיסר של האימפריה הרומית היו מטבעות עם תמונת פניו,
המדינה ההיא טביעה מטבעות עם תמונות של פניהם של מנהיגיה העליונים,
והמדינה הזו היא הוותיקן,
שהספר הראשי שלו, התנ”ך,
מכיל דוקטרינה אבסורדית מאדם ארוך שיער שהם מכנים “מושיעם”,
דוקטרינה האומרת:
“אהבת את אויבך, כי אני אומר שהחוק: עין תחת עין, שן תחת שן וחיים לכל החיים, אינו אומר עוד צדק”.
האם הם יאמרו לקורבנות של התעללות מינית לאהוב את האנסים שלהם?
כל אחד מגן על העם שלו, נכון?
אם מייקל בצד של האנשים הטובים,
של מי השטן בצד?,
מי יגן על אנשים נתעבים כאלה מלבד השטן עצמו?
אם לשטן היו ילדים,
אם היו אנשים שמתאימים לפרופיל של בנו של השטן,
האם השטן לא יהיה היחיד שמעוניין להציל אותם מעונש צודק?
האם השטן לא יהיה היחיד שניזוק מהצדק?
אני מאמין שאלוהים קיים ושהוא צודק, תורת עין תחת עין, שן תחת שן וחיים לכל החיים נראית לי כדוקטרינה צודקת במידה שהתוקף יוזם אותה ללא הצדקה.
רק השטן יכול היה להתנגד לאלוהים.
המשיח שהמכנים עצמם נוצרים עוקבים אחריו הוא השטן משום שהוא מתנגד לצדק של אלוהים.
אני אדם שרוצה עונש מוות חוקי לאנסים, סוחטים, רוצחים, נוכלים, חוטפים, וכאלה המבקשים את מותם של חפים מפשע באמצעות לשון הרע;
הרצון לצדק ולהיות מגן התנ”ך אינם עולים בקנה אחד.
לא כדאי להיות נוצרי כי הנצרות מבוססת על התנ”ך, והתנ”ך מבוסס על שקרים רומיים.
האם זאב יכול להפוך לכבשה?,
האם כבשה אבודה היא זאב?,
הזאבים הרומאים אמרו שהרועה אהב את הזאבים.
הזאבים לבושים ככבשים אומרים:
ולפי ספר קודש זה, זו הציווי: כבשים, אהבו את אויבכם הזאב, והאכילו אותו בבשרכם ובדמכם.
(מתי ה’:38).
השטן אומר לחסידיו העייפים, שהם ינוחו על ידי ציות למצוותיו כגון ללכת שני מייל במקום על אחד. (מתי 11:28, מתי 5:41).
| #FEEDBACK | COMMENT | SOURCE | VIDEO |
| 163 | @JoseElsegador hace 0 segundos Can you conceive of the lion of Judah sharing food, including pork, at a table with Antiochus IV Epiphanes, that king who wanted to Hellenize the faith of the Jews and killed some of them for refusing to eat pork? Can you conceive of him saying: “His wickedness is forgiven because he accepted me as his only savior and lord, and because he believed me when I said “eat everything because I am above the law: Deuteronomy 14 and Leviticus 11 are part of the past”, because he believes me when I said: “No to justified revenge, love your enemy because Numbers 35:33 is also part of the past, it is a commandment that stopped being justice with my arrival”, “Eat everything because my “words weigh more than the words of the prophet Isaiah (Isaiah 65, Isaiah 66).” It does not make sense that the Lion of Judah is that man with long hair who looks like the Greek god Zeus, the god of Antiochus IV of Epiphanes, and that he also said: “Nothing that enters a man’s mouth contaminates him.” “(Matthew 15:11), because that is an insult to the faith of those seven brothers and their mother, who for love of God’s law regarding forbidden foods were martyred by that Greek king, those martyrs had faith in that by dying for the laws of their God, they would live again to inherit eternal life. Let us remember that those Jews did not want to adopt Greek customs (2 Maccabees 7), but the Romans could get along with such customs, which is why you have what you find in the Bible: myths and Hellenism contradicting Jewish truths: a terrible graft. |
https://youtu.be/2OOk5e2rzV4 | The Final Day Of Judgement – You URGENTLY Need To Know This |
| 162 | @user-ro3jq4ow1k hace 1 mes (editado) Lord I am a liar, I’m lazy, I steal, I say your name is vain, and I just want to repent for my sins. I love you and I believe you have died on the cross for our sins and has shed his blood for us. We don’t deserve it but you chose to do that for us, yet we still reject you and sin. So I just want to say that I admit I’m a sinner and I beg for forgiveness. In Jesus’ Lovely holy name. Amen. @JoseElsegador hace 1 segundo @faby_baby It does not work that way, it is not enough to confess sins, it is mandatory to stop sinning: Matthew 7:22 Many will say to me on that day, ‘Lord, Lord, did we not prophesy in your name and in your name drive out demons and in your name perform many miracles?’ 23 Then I will tell them plainly, ‘I never knew you. Away from me, you evildoers!’. Trusting everyword in the Bible isn’t either the way to salvation, for example in the prophecy related to Matthew 7:22, it reads that he hates his enemies, in consecuence the love for the enemies doctrine is not his: Psalms 139:19 If only you, God, would slay the wicked! Away from me, you who are bloodthirsty! 20 They speak of you with evil intent; your adversaries misuse your name. 21 Do I not hate those who hate you, Lord, and abhor those who are in rebellion against you? 22 I have nothing but hatred for them; I count them my enemies. Jesus preached the Lord (Jehovah) as the only God and saviour to worship, as the only one to direct prayers to; When Jesus was dying on the cross his enemies’ words show that he preached not himself, but Jehovah as the saviour: Psalms 22:7 All who see me mock me; they hurl insults, shaking their heads. 8 “He trusts in Jehovah,” they say, “let the Lord rescue him. But what the Roman Empire has done is terrible: They showed a different Christ and a different gospel and made that official in the Bible, the cult for creature was on their minds: Matthew 27:42 “He saved others,” they said, “but he can’t save himself! He’s the king of Israel! Let him come down now from the cross, and we will believe in him. They have said that salvation is trought worshipping a long haired man, who reseambles a pagan god named Zeus, that people must accept him as the only savior. The Romans have hellenized the gospel. The Roman persecutos have never converted to the faith of Jesus, but they have hid, destroyed and adulterated the messages of his faith. |
https://youtu.be/nQp6d__NTxU | The Day Of Judgement – What Will It Be Like? (Part 2) |
| 161 | @user-ro3jq4ow1k hace 1 mes (editado) Lord I am a liar, I’m lazy, I steal, I say your name is vain, and I just want to repent for my sins. I love you and I believe you have died on the cross for our sins and has shed his blood for us. We don’t deserve it but you chose to do that for us, yet we still reject you and sin. So I just want to say that I admit I’m a sinner and I beg for forgiveness. In Jesus’ Lovely holy name. Amen. 89 7 |
https://youtu.be/nQp6d__NTxU | The Day Of Judgement – What Will It Be Like? (Part 2) |
Terrible, as bad as the willing ignorance of many millions of proud supporters of priests and pastors.
“That if thou shalt confess with thy mouth the Lord Jesus, and shalt believe in thine heart that God hath raised him from the dead, thou shalt be saved.” -Romans 10:9
Jesus did not even resurrect at the third day!.
Many quote Romans 10:9 as a kind of mantra with which they feel secure from receiving a proper punishment, I enjoy destroying the deceit:
It does not work that way, it is not enough to confess sins, it is mandatory to stop sinning: Matthew 7:22 Many will say to me on that day, ‘Lord, Lord, did we not prophesy in your name and in your name drive out demons and in your name perform many miracles?’ 23 Then I will tell them plainly, ‘I never knew you. Away from me, you evildoers!’. Trusting every word in the Bible isn’t either the way to salvation, for example in the prophecy related to Matthew 7:22, it reads that he hates his enemies, in consequence the love for the enemies doctrine is not his: Psalms 139:19 If only you, God, would slay the wicked! Away from me, you who are bloodthirsty! 20 They speak of you with evil intent; your adversaries misuse your name. 21 Do I not hate those who hate you, Lord, and abhor those who are in rebellion against you? 22 I have nothing but hatred for them; I count them my enemies.
Jesus preached the Lord (Jehovah) as the only God and savior to worship, as the only one to direct prayers to; When Jesus was dying on the cross his enemies’ words show that he preached not himself, but Jehovah as the savior: Psalms 22:7 All who see me mock me; they hurl insults, shaking their heads. 8 “He trusts in Jehovah,” they say, “let the Lord rescue him. But what the Roman Empire has done is terrible:
They showed a different Christ and a different gospel and made that official in the Bible, the cult for creature was on their minds:
Matthew 27:42 “He saved others,” they said, “but he can’t save himself! He’s the king of Israel! Let him come down now from the cross, and we will believe in him.
They have said that salvation is through worshipping a long haired man, who resembles a pagan god named Zeus, that people must accept him as the only savior. The Romans have Hellenized the gospel. The Roman persecutors have never converted to the faith of Jesus, but they have hid, destroyed and adulterated the messages of his faith.
That long haired god is Satan (there are many Satans, (slandereres)), his religion is what the world calls “christianity”, I will explain:
Defending the Bible and being in favor of the death penalty is incompatible, that is why I do not defend the Bible, I denounce its inconsistencies, can you help me?
Years ago I saw a news story that happened in Brazil, two women murdered a 9-year-old boy, Rhuan Maycon: https://sputniknews.lat/20190621/asesinato-nino-rhuan-juan-brasil-ideologia-genero-1087731520. html – https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asesinato_de_Rhuan_da_Silva
I would have wanted the death penalty for these murderers, that’s why years ago, I uploaded a video titled: Christianity is in favor of the death penalty – The Case of Rhuan Maycon.
But I must clarify that when you say you are a Christian, they immediately associate you with being a defender of the Bible, if we are referring to that type of Christian, then I am not a Christian, I was referring to true Christianity, the one that was not based on Bible, but since no one knows it, then I say:
I am not a Christian because the typical Christian leader claims to base his faith on the Bible, and among those who love the Bible there are pastors and priests who rape children,
only people like that could love impunity for their own crimes,
I am referring to the non-legality of punishment that I consider to be the only appropriate punishment for such evil:
the death penalty.
It is an impunity based on respect for certian country,
That country is small in territory, but not small in influece,
That contry has embassies in various countries of the world,
That country has a yellow and white banner,
As the Ceasar of the Roman empire had coins with the image his face,
that country mint coins with images of the faces of their supreme leaders.
and that country is the Vatican,
whose main book, the Bible,
contains an absurd doctrine from whom they call “Their savior”,
doctrine which says:
“Love your enemy, because an eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth stopped being justice with my arrival”,
Will they tell victims of sexual abuse to love their rapists?
Each one defends his own people, right?,
If Michael is on the side of the good people,
Who is the Devil on the side of?,
Who would defend such despicable people but the Devil himself?
If the Devil had children,
If there were people who fit the profile of the Devil’s son,
Wouldn’t the Devil be the only one interested in saving them from a just punishment?
Wouldn’t the Devil be the only one damaged by justice?
I believe that God exists and that he is just, the doctrine of an eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth and life for life seems to me to be a just doctrine to the extent that the aggressor initiates it without justification.
Only the Devil could oppose God.
The Christ that those who call themselves Christians follow is the devil because he opposes the justice of God.
I am a man who wants the legalized death penalty for rapists, extortionists, murderers, swindlers, kidnappers, and those who seek the death of innocent people through slander;
desiring that and being a defender of the Bible are incompatible.
It is not worth becoming a Christian because Christianity is based on the Bible, and the Bible is based on Roman lies.
Revelation 12:7-12 Then war broke out in heaven. Michael and his angels fought against the dragon, and the dragon and his angels fought back.
And because the army of Michael has prevailed:
12 Therefore rejoice, you heavens
and you who dwell in them!
But woe to the earth and the sea,
because the devil has gone down to you!
He is filled with fury,
because he knows that his time is short.”
Deuteronomy 32:43 “Rejoice with him, O heavens;
bow down to him, all gods, for he avenges the blood of his children
and takes vengeance on his adversaries.
He repays those who hate him
and cleanses his people’s land.”
44 Moses came and recited all the words of this song in the hearing of the people, he and Joshua the son of Nun.
Damn dirty ape, can you understand me?
I will show you a lie which is a drop in a sea of lies in the Bible; but before: In a single image, in the one below, I tell you what motivates me to create these articles.
Real Case: Abel vs. Caina: The just man versus the slanderous woman (A)
I expose the Roman lies in the Bible because at my ignorance I followed bad Roman advice in the Bible which made me sin and fall at the feet of a slanderous and treacherous woman.
My words instants before the three coward men, friends of Sandra Bazan, began to attack me with kicks and stones, in front of her, when she had slandered me accusing me falsely of sexual harassment (1998): (C )
I answered: “What? No, I am not harassing her, it is not harassing, in my letter I ask her:” Sandra, what do you want from me? I did all this for you, but you call me, you tell me to look for you and when I look for you, you reject me and insult me (but I pray for you because the Bible says … “thanks for your ‘wise’ advice, Satan!! (I am being ironic)”),
what happens to you? What do you want from me? Do you love me inside and act that way because this is my ex’s witchcraft.
Do you act this way because you have entered a sect? Are you making fun of me? Tell me what’s wrong! “, That’s not harassment. (D)
https://ntiend.me/2023/02/21/roman-myths-in-the-bible-judas-iscariot-the-traitor-never-existed/
Notice Stephen’s attitude moments before he was killed as the Bible says, read how he addressed those he considered wicked:
Acts 7:51 Stiff-necked, and uncircumcised in heart and hearing. You always resist the Holy Spirit; Like your parents, so do you. 52 Which of the prophets did your fathers not persecute? And they slew those who foretold the coming of the Righteous One, of whom you have now been betrayers and slayers;
His attitude against the wicked is in harmony with the proverb that says the righteous hate the wicked: Proverbs 29:27.
The fact that Stephen was stoned by the wicked confirms what that proverb also says: The wicked hate the righteous.
But in his agony, something that doesn’t fit happens, suddenly Stephen, from behaving like an aggressive lion against the wicked, behaves like a meek kitten with the wicked, and that doesn’t make sense, it doesn’t make any sense:
Stephen’s death and his sudden change of attitude makes the narrative hardly believable.
Acts 7:58 And they stoned Stephen, while he cried out, and said, Lord, hold them not to account for this sin. And having said this, he died.
A very strange change of attitude for someone who moments before had spoken firmly and hatefully to his enemies.
Now read this:
Revelation 6:9-10 Those who had been put to death for the word of God and for their testimony cried with a loud voice, saying, How long, O Lord, holy and true, dost thou not judge and avenge our blood on them that dwell on the earth?
Stephen is supposed to be one of them, but here he is not seen interceding for them to be forgiven for killing him.
This contradiction is not a symptom of the fact that you, who agree with me and I, do not understand the scriptures as the defenders of the Bible would say, this is not an “apparent contradiction”, as they would say. The contradiction is real and is symptomatic of a Roman fraud in the Bible. It also makes no sense for St. Stephen to address a creature and not God in his last prayer, but that is another fraud that I have removed from Acts 7:58 to focus on the feelings of the saints toward those who killed them. Proverbs 29:27 says that the righteous hate the wicked, the prophecy in Psalm 58:10 confirms those feelings, contrasting Matthew 5:38 with Revelation 6:9 demonstrates based on logic, that the Bible does not deserve the credit that many rulers of various countries of the world give it by swearing with their hand on the Bible when assuming their public offices.
Everything becomes so untrustworthy that it is worth asking, did Stephen argue with Jews or with Romans?, did the Jews stone him or did the Romans stone him but the Romans blamed the Jews?, even: did Stephen really exist?, the Jews did not eat pork, but oh what a coincidence, in Matthew 15:11 the Bible says that Jesus said: they can eat everything, that doesn’t square with the prophecies of Isaiah in the last chapter of the book Isaiah. Do you realize the anti-Jewish tone of the Bible? It has texts from Judaism, but they are denied in its false New Testament.
Now read this:
Revelation 6:9-10 Those who had been put to death for the word of God and for their testimony cried with a loud voice, saying, How long, O Lord, holy and true, dost thou not judge and avenge our blood on them that dwell on the earth?
Stephen is supposed to be one of them, but here he wants to be avenged, he wants the sin of those who murdered him to be taken into account.
Can you conceive of the lion of Judah sharing food, including pork, at a table with Antiochus IV Epiphanes, that king who wanted to Hellenize the faith of the Jews and killed some of them for refusing to eat pork?
Michael says to Samael: “If you are a wolf, then I am a lion!”.
Can you conceive of him saying: “His wickedness is forgiven because he accepted me as his only savior and lord, and because he believed me when I said “eat everything because I am above the law: Deuteronomy 14 and Leviticus 11 are part of the past”, because he believes me when I said: “No to justified revenge, love your enemy because Numbers 35:33 is also part of the past, it is a commandment that stopped being justice with my arrival”, “Eat everything because my “words weigh more than the words of the prophet Isaiah (Isaiah 65, Isaiah 66).”
It does not make sense that the Lion of Judah is that man with long hair who looks like the Greek god Zeus, the god of Antiochus IV of Epiphanes, and that he also said: “Nothing that enters a man’s mouth contaminates him” (Matthew 15:11), because that is an insult to the faith of those seven brothers and their mother, who for love of God’s law regarding forbidden foods were martyred by that Greek king, those martyrs had faith in that by dying for the laws of their God, they would live again to inherit eternal life. Let us remember that those Jews did not want to adopt Greek customs (2 Maccabees 7), but the Romans could get along with such customs, which is why you have what you find in the Bible: myths and Hellenism contradicting Jewish truths: a terrible graft.
“Para la bruja, sin amor.” (No facturo con mi canción pero la disfruto). https://youtu.be/-ofhLE4WkoI
Mitos bíblicos: Esteban es apedreado: Testimonios falsos en la muerte de Esteban por apedreamiento. https://youtu.be/o8zdXT63zjw
Solamente los justos conocerán la verdad y serán libres para siempre https://youtu.be/xhWTRH6ihpU
The love of enemies is a deception of the enemy of God, the denial of the law that prohibits the consumption of foods such as pork and bats is also a deception; The Bible has lies from the empire that never converted to the faith that it persecuted, the Roman empire persecuted that faith to destroy it by Hellenizing it. In the version of the gospel falsified by the Romans in Matthew 15:11 Jesus tells us (To deny the law in Deuteronomy 14): “Eat everything because nothing that enters a man’s mouth contaminates him”, the Romans are thus accusing Jesus of something that as a faithful Jew he never said: Like Antiochus IV Epiphanes, they had in mind to Hellenize the true religion. The gospel was Hellenized by the Romans, like the face of Zeus, so they tell us with the images that it was the face of Jesus; and the doctrine of the Greek Cleobulus of Lindos is the one that says: “Love your enemy”, but they tell us that Jesus taught it: And that is a lie. Antiochus IV Epiphanes tortured eight Jews, seven brothers and his mother because they refused to eat pork because God forbids it (Leviticus 11, 2 Maccabees 7). The prophecy in Isaiah 65 confirms two things: 1 # God loves his friends and hates his enemies. 2# The consumption of pork is confirmed prohibited. Antiochus, the Greek king: “Would you like to eat pork so they won’t cut your body to pieces? (2 Maccabees 7:7).” Zeus, the Greek god: “Nothing that I God did is bad if you receive it by praying to me, are they going to refuse to eat pork?, worship me all, those who don’t, go to eternal fire (1 Timothy 4:3 , Hebrews 1:6, Luke 11:28, Matthew 18:7).” The phrase: “Do good to your friends and enemies, because in this way you will preserve the ones and it will be possible for you to attract the others.” It is from Cleobulus of Lindos, “love your enemy is another way of saying the same thing”, but that contradicts the law and the prophets, Jesus respected the word of God, but the Roman persecutors did not.
.gif)
.gif)
144000 
3 thoughts on “להגן על התנ”ך ולהיות בעד עונש מוות זה לא עולה, לכן אני לא מגן על התנ”ך, אני מגנה את חוסר העקביות שלו, אתה יכול לעזור לי?”
Comments are closed.