سزائے موت عیسائیت سے مطابقت نہیں رکھتی، یہی وجہ ہے کہ میں عیسائی نہیں ہوں۔
بائبل کا دفاع کرنا اور سزائے موت کے حق میں ہونا ایک دوسرے سے مطابقت نہیں رکھتا، یہی وجہ ہے کہ میں بائبل کا دفاع نہیں کرتا، میں اس کے تضادات کی مذمت کرتا ہوں، کیا آپ میری مدد کر سکتے ہیں؟
کئی سال پہلے، میں نے برازیل میں ہونے والی ایک خبر دیکھی، دو خواتین نے ایک 9 سالہ لڑکے، روان میکن کو قتل کر دیا:
(https://sputniknews.lat/20190621/asesinato-nino-rhuan-juan-brasil-ideologia-genero-1087731520.html)
https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asesinato_de_Rhuan_da_Silva
)
میں چاہتا تھا کہ ان قاتلوں کو سزائے موت دی جائے، یہی وجہ ہے کہ برسوں پہلے میں نے ایک ویڈیو اپ لوڈ کی تھی جس کا عنوان تھا: مسیحیت سزائے موت کے حق میں ہے- روان میکون کا کیس۔
(https://144k.xyz/2023/10/20/no-soy-cristiano-porque-el-tipico-lider-cristiano-dice-basar-su-fe-en-la-biblia-y-entre-los-que-aman-la-biblia-se-encuentran-pastores-y-curas-violadores-de-ninos-solo-gente-asi-podria-amar-la-impuni/)
لیکن میں یہ واضح کرنا چاہوں گا کہ جب آپ کہتے ہیں کہ آپ ایک مسیحی ہیں، تو وہ فوری طور پر آپ کو بائبل کے محافظ کے طور پر منسلک کرتے ہیں، اگر ہم اس قسم کے مسیحی کی بات کر رہے ہیں، تو میں ایک مسیحی نہیں ہوں، میں سچی مسیحیت کی طرف اشارہ کر رہا تھا، جو بائبل پر مبنی نہیں تھا، لیکن چونکہ کوئی اسے نہیں جانتا ہے، پھر میں کہتا ہوں:
میں عیسائی نہیں ہوں کیونکہ عام مسیحی رہنما اپنے عقیدے کی بنیاد بائبل پر رکھنے کا دعویٰ کرتا ہے، اور بائبل سے محبت کرنے والوں میں پادری اور پادری ہیں جو بچوں کی عصمت دری کرتے ہیں،
صرف ان جیسے لوگ اپنے جرائم کی سزا کی کمی سے محبت کر سکتے ہیں،
میں سزا کی غیر قانونی حیثیت کی طرف اشارہ کر رہا ہوں جسے میں اس طرح کی برائی کے لئے واحد مناسب سزا سمجھتا ہوں:
سزائے موت
یہ ایک استثنیٰ ہے جس کی بنیاد مخصوص ملک کے احترام پر مبنی ہے،
وہ ملک رقبے میں چھوٹا ہے، لیکن اثر و رسوخ میں چھوٹا نہیں ہے،
اس ملک کے سفارت خانے دنیا کے مختلف ممالک میں ہیں،
اس ملک میں پیلے اور سفید رنگ کا بینر ہے،
جیسا کہ رومی سلطنت کے سیزر کے پاس اس کے چہرے کی تصویر کے ساتھ سکے تھے،
وہ ملک اپنے اعلیٰ رہنماؤں کے چہروں کی تصویروں کے ساتھ سکے بناتا ہے،
اور وہ ملک ویٹیکن ہے،
جس کی اہم کتاب، بائبل،
اس میں ایک لمبے بالوں والے شخص کا ایک مضحکہ خیز نظریہ ہے جسے وہ “اپنا نجات دہندہ” کہتے ہیں،
نظریہ جس میں کہا گیا ہے:
“اپنے دشمن سے محبت کرو، کیونکہ میں کہتا ہوں کہ قانون: ایک آنکھ کے لئے آنکھ، ایک دانت کے لئے ایک دانت اور زندگی کے لئے زندگی، اب انصاف کا مطلب نہیں ہے.”
کیا وہ جنسی استحصال کے متاثرین کو اپنے عصمت دری کرنے والوں سے محبت کرنے کے لئے کہیں گے؟
ہر ایک اپنے لوگوں کا دفاع کرتا ہے، ٹھیک ہے؟،
اگر مائیکل اچھے لوگوں کے ساتھ ہے،
شیطان کس کی طرف ہے؟،
ایسے گھناؤنے لوگوں کا دفاع خود شیطان کے سوا کون کرے گا؟
اگر شیطان کے بچے ہوتے،
اگر ایسے لوگ تھے جو شیطان کے بیٹے کی پروفائل پر فٹ ہوتے،
کیا شیطان اکیلا نہیں ہوگا جو انہیں منصفانہ سزا سے بچانے میں دلچسپی رکھتا ہو؟
کیا صرف شیطان ہی انصاف سے نقصان نہیں اٹھا سکتا؟
میرا ماننا ہے کہ خدا موجود ہے اور وہ انصاف پسند ہے، آنکھ کے لیے آنکھ، دانت کے لیے دانت اور زندگی کے لیے زندگی کا نظریہ مجھے اس حد تک منصفانہ نظریہ لگتا ہے کہ حملہ آور بغیر کسی جواز کے اس کا آغاز کر دیتا ہے۔
صرف شیطان ہی خدا کی مخالفت کر سکتا ہے۔
وہ مسیح جس کی پیروی وہ لوگ کرتے ہیں جو اپنے آپ کو عیسائی کہتے ہیں وہ شیطان ہے کیونکہ وہ خدا کے انصاف کی مخالفت کرتا ہے۔
میں ایک ایسا شخص ہوں جو ریپ کرنے والوں، بھتہ خوروں، قاتلوں، دھوکہ بازوں، اغوا کاروں اور ان لوگوں کے لئے قانونی سزائے موت چاہتا ہوں جو بدنامی کے ذریعے بے گناہ لوگوں کی موت چاہتے ہیں۔
انصاف کی خواہش اور بائبل کا محافظ ہونا ایک دوسرے سے مطابقت نہیں رکھتا۔
یہ عیسائی بننے کے قابل نہیں ہے کیونکہ عیسائیت بائبل پر مبنی ہے، اور بائبل رومی جھوٹ پر مبنی ہے.
https://144k.xyz/2023/10/22/can-you-conceive-of-the-lion-of-judah-sharing-food-including-pork-at-a-table-with-antiochus-iv-epiphanes-that-king-who-wanted-to-hellenize-the-faith-of-the-jews-and-killed-some-of-them-for-refusing/
کیا بھیڑیا بھیڑ بن سکتا ہے؟،
کیا آوارہ بھیڑیے ہیں؟،
رومی بھیڑیوں نے کہا کہ چرواہے بھیڑیوں سے محبت کرتے ہیں۔
بھیڑوں کے لباس میں بھیڑیے کہتے ہیں:
“اور اس مقدس کتاب کے مطابق، مندرجہ ذیل حکم ہے: بھیڑ، اپنے دشمن بھیڑیے سے محبت کرو، اور اسے اپنے گوشت اور خون سے کھانا کھلاؤ. (متی 5 :38)۔
شیطان اپنے تھکے ہوئے پیروکاروں سے کہتا ہے کہ اگر وہ اس کے حکم پر عمل کریں تو ایک کے بجائے دو میل پیدل چلیں گے۔ (متی 11 :28، متی 5 :41)
دو چاندوں والے سیارے کی تباہی۔ |
#FEEDBACK | COMMENT | SOURCE | VIDEO |
163 | @JoseElsegador hace 0 segundos Can you conceive of the lion of Judah sharing food, including pork, at a table with Antiochus IV Epiphanes, that king who wanted to Hellenize the faith of the Jews and killed some of them for refusing to eat pork? Can you conceive of him saying: “His wickedness is forgiven because he accepted me as his only savior and lord, and because he believed me when I said “eat everything because I am above the law: Deuteronomy 14 and Leviticus 11 are part of the past”, because he believes me when I said: “No to justified revenge, love your enemy because Numbers 35:33 is also part of the past, it is a commandment that stopped being justice with my arrival”, “Eat everything because my “words weigh more than the words of the prophet Isaiah (Isaiah 65, Isaiah 66).” It does not make sense that the Lion of Judah is that man with long hair who looks like the Greek god Zeus, the god of Antiochus IV of Epiphanes, and that he also said: “Nothing that enters a man’s mouth contaminates him.” “(Matthew 15:11), because that is an insult to the faith of those seven brothers and their mother, who for love of God’s law regarding forbidden foods were martyred by that Greek king, those martyrs had faith in that by dying for the laws of their God, they would live again to inherit eternal life. Let us remember that those Jews did not want to adopt Greek customs (2 Maccabees 7), but the Romans could get along with such customs, which is why you have what you find in the Bible: myths and Hellenism contradicting Jewish truths: a terrible graft. |
https://youtu.be/2OOk5e2rzV4 | The Final Day Of Judgement – You URGENTLY Need To Know This |
162 | @user-ro3jq4ow1k hace 1 mes (editado) Lord I am a liar, I’m lazy, I steal, I say your name is vain, and I just want to repent for my sins. I love you and I believe you have died on the cross for our sins and has shed his blood for us. We don’t deserve it but you chose to do that for us, yet we still reject you and sin. So I just want to say that I admit I’m a sinner and I beg for forgiveness. In Jesus’ Lovely holy name. Amen. @JoseElsegador hace 1 segundo @faby_baby It does not work that way, it is not enough to confess sins, it is mandatory to stop sinning: Matthew 7:22 Many will say to me on that day, ‘Lord, Lord, did we not prophesy in your name and in your name drive out demons and in your name perform many miracles?’ 23 Then I will tell them plainly, ‘I never knew you. Away from me, you evildoers!’. Trusting everyword in the Bible isn’t either the way to salvation, for example in the prophecy related to Matthew 7:22, it reads that he hates his enemies, in consecuence the love for the enemies doctrine is not his: Psalms 139:19 If only you, God, would slay the wicked! Away from me, you who are bloodthirsty! 20 They speak of you with evil intent; your adversaries misuse your name. 21 Do I not hate those who hate you, Lord, and abhor those who are in rebellion against you? 22 I have nothing but hatred for them; I count them my enemies. Jesus preached the Lord (Jehovah) as the only God and saviour to worship, as the only one to direct prayers to; When Jesus was dying on the cross his enemies’ words show that he preached not himself, but Jehovah as the saviour: Psalms 22:7 All who see me mock me; they hurl insults, shaking their heads. 8 “He trusts in Jehovah,” they say, “let the Lord rescue him. But what the Roman Empire has done is terrible: They showed a different Christ and a different gospel and made that official in the Bible, the cult for creature was on their minds: Matthew 27:42 “He saved others,” they said, “but he can’t save himself! He’s the king of Israel! Let him come down now from the cross, and we will believe in him. They have said that salvation is trought worshipping a long haired man, who reseambles a pagan god named Zeus, that people must accept him as the only savior. The Romans have hellenized the gospel. The Roman persecutos have never converted to the faith of Jesus, but they have hid, destroyed and adulterated the messages of his faith. |
https://youtu.be/nQp6d__NTxU | The Day Of Judgement – What Will It Be Like? (Part 2) |
161 | @user-ro3jq4ow1k hace 1 mes (editado) Lord I am a liar, I’m lazy, I steal, I say your name is vain, and I just want to repent for my sins. I love you and I believe you have died on the cross for our sins and has shed his blood for us. We don’t deserve it but you chose to do that for us, yet we still reject you and sin. So I just want to say that I admit I’m a sinner and I beg for forgiveness. In Jesus’ Lovely holy name. Amen. 89 7 |
https://youtu.be/nQp6d__NTxU | The Day Of Judgement – What Will It Be Like? (Part 2) |
Terrible, as bad as the willing ignorance of many millions of proud supporters of priests and pastors.
“That if thou shalt confess with thy mouth the Lord Jesus, and shalt believe in thine heart that God hath raised him from the dead, thou shalt be saved.” -Romans 10:9
Jesus did not even resurrect at the third day!.
Many quote Romans 10:9 as a kind of mantra with which they feel secure from receiving a proper punishment, I enjoy destroying the deceit:
It does not work that way, it is not enough to confess sins, it is mandatory to stop sinning: Matthew 7:22 Many will say to me on that day, ‘Lord, Lord, did we not prophesy in your name and in your name drive out demons and in your name perform many miracles?’ 23 Then I will tell them plainly, ‘I never knew you. Away from me, you evildoers!’. Trusting every word in the Bible isn’t either the way to salvation, for example in the prophecy related to Matthew 7:22, it reads that he hates his enemies, in consequence the love for the enemies doctrine is not his: Psalms 139:19 If only you, God, would slay the wicked! Away from me, you who are bloodthirsty! 20 They speak of you with evil intent; your adversaries misuse your name. 21 Do I not hate those who hate you, Lord, and abhor those who are in rebellion against you? 22 I have nothing but hatred for them; I count them my enemies.
Jesus preached the Lord (Jehovah) as the only God and savior to worship, as the only one to direct prayers to; When Jesus was dying on the cross his enemies’ words show that he preached not himself, but Jehovah as the savior: Psalms 22:7 All who see me mock me; they hurl insults, shaking their heads. 8 “He trusts in Jehovah,” they say, “let the Lord rescue him. But what the Roman Empire has done is terrible:
They showed a different Christ and a different gospel and made that official in the Bible, the cult for creature was on their minds:
Matthew 27:42 “He saved others,” they said, “but he can’t save himself! He’s the king of Israel! Let him come down now from the cross, and we will believe in him.
They have said that salvation is through worshipping a long haired man, who resembles a pagan god named Zeus, that people must accept him as the only savior. The Romans have Hellenized the gospel. The Roman persecutors have never converted to the faith of Jesus, but they have hid, destroyed and adulterated the messages of his faith.
That long haired god is Satan (there are many Satans, (slandereres)), his religion is what the world calls “christianity”, I will explain:
Defending the Bible and being in favor of the death penalty is incompatible, that is why I do not defend the Bible, I denounce its inconsistencies, can you help me?
Years ago I saw a news story that happened in Brazil, two women murdered a 9-year-old boy, Rhuan Maycon: https://sputniknews.lat/20190621/asesinato-nino-rhuan-juan-brasil-ideologia-genero-1087731520. html – https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asesinato_de_Rhuan_da_Silva
I would have wanted the death penalty for these murderers, that’s why years ago, I uploaded a video titled: Christianity is in favor of the death penalty – The Case of Rhuan Maycon.
But I must clarify that when you say you are a Christian, they immediately associate you with being a defender of the Bible, if we are referring to that type of Christian, then I am not a Christian, I was referring to true Christianity, the one that was not based on Bible, but since no one knows it, then I say:
I am not a Christian because the typical Christian leader claims to base his faith on the Bible, and among those who love the Bible there are pastors and priests who rape children,
only people like that could love impunity for their own crimes,
I am referring to the non-legality of punishment that I consider to be the only appropriate punishment for such evil:
the death penalty.
It is an impunity based on respect for certian country,
That country is small in territory, but not small in influece,
That contry has embassies in various countries of the world,
That country has a yellow and white banner,
As the Ceasar of the Roman empire had coins with the image his face,
that country mint coins with images of the faces of their supreme leaders.
and that country is the Vatican,
whose main book, the Bible,
contains an absurd doctrine from whom they call “Their savior”,
doctrine which says:
“Love your enemy, because an eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth stopped being justice with my arrival”,
Will they tell victims of sexual abuse to love their rapists?
Each one defends his own people, right?,
If Michael is on the side of the good people,
Who is the Devil on the side of?,
Who would defend such despicable people but the Devil himself?
If the Devil had children,
If there were people who fit the profile of the Devil’s son,
Wouldn’t the Devil be the only one interested in saving them from a just punishment?
Wouldn’t the Devil be the only one damaged by justice?
I believe that God exists and that he is just, the doctrine of an eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth and life for life seems to me to be a just doctrine to the extent that the aggressor initiates it without justification.
Only the Devil could oppose God.
The Christ that those who call themselves Christians follow is the devil because he opposes the justice of God.
I am a man who wants the legalized death penalty for rapists, extortionists, murderers, swindlers, kidnappers, and those who seek the death of innocent people through slander;
desiring that and being a defender of the Bible are incompatible.
It is not worth becoming a Christian because Christianity is based on the Bible, and the Bible is based on Roman lies.
Revelation 12:7-12 Then war broke out in heaven. Michael and his angels fought against the dragon, and the dragon and his angels fought back.
And because the army of Michael has prevailed:
12 Therefore rejoice, you heavens
and you who dwell in them!
But woe to the earth and the sea,
because the devil has gone down to you!
He is filled with fury,
because he knows that his time is short.”
Deuteronomy 32:43 “Rejoice with him, O heavens;
bow down to him, all gods, for he avenges the blood of his children
and takes vengeance on his adversaries.
He repays those who hate him
and cleanses his people’s land.”
44 Moses came and recited all the words of this song in the hearing of the people, he and Joshua the son of Nun.
Damn dirty ape, can you understand me?
I will show you a lie which is a drop in a sea of lies in the Bible; but before: In a single image, in the one below, I tell you what motivates me to create these articles.
Real Case: Abel vs. Caina: The just man versus the slanderous woman (A)
I expose the Roman lies in the Bible because at my ignorance I followed bad Roman advice in the Bible which made me sin and fall at the feet of a slanderous and treacherous woman.
My words instants before the three coward men, friends of Sandra Bazan, began to attack me with kicks and stones, in front of her, when she had slandered me accusing me falsely of sexual harassment (1998): (C )
I answered: “What? No, I am not harassing her, it is not harassing, in my letter I ask her:” Sandra, what do you want from me? I did all this for you, but you call me, you tell me to look for you and when I look for you, you reject me and insult me (but I pray for you because the Bible says … “thanks for your ‘wise’ advice, Satan!! (I am being ironic)”),
what happens to you? What do you want from me? Do you love me inside and act that way because this is my ex’s witchcraft.
Do you act this way because you have entered a sect? Are you making fun of me? Tell me what’s wrong! “, That’s not harassment. (D)
https://ntiend.me/2023/02/21/roman-myths-in-the-bible-judas-iscariot-the-traitor-never-existed/
Notice Stephen’s attitude moments before he was killed as the Bible says, read how he addressed those he considered wicked:
Acts 7:51 Stiff-necked, and uncircumcised in heart and hearing. You always resist the Holy Spirit; Like your parents, so do you. 52 Which of the prophets did your fathers not persecute? And they slew those who foretold the coming of the Righteous One, of whom you have now been betrayers and slayers;
His attitude against the wicked is in harmony with the proverb that says the righteous hate the wicked: Proverbs 29:27.
The fact that Stephen was stoned by the wicked confirms what that proverb also says: The wicked hate the righteous.
But in his agony, something that doesn’t fit happens, suddenly Stephen, from behaving like an aggressive lion against the wicked, behaves like a meek kitten with the wicked, and that doesn’t make sense, it doesn’t make any sense:
Stephen’s death and his sudden change of attitude makes the narrative hardly believable.
Acts 7:58 And they stoned Stephen, while he cried out, and said, Lord, hold them not to account for this sin. And having said this, he died.
A very strange change of attitude for someone who moments before had spoken firmly and hatefully to his enemies.
Now read this:
Revelation 6:9-10 Those who had been put to death for the word of God and for their testimony cried with a loud voice, saying, How long, O Lord, holy and true, dost thou not judge and avenge our blood on them that dwell on the earth?
Stephen is supposed to be one of them, but here he is not seen interceding for them to be forgiven for killing him.
This contradiction is not a symptom of the fact that you, who agree with me and I, do not understand the scriptures as the defenders of the Bible would say, this is not an “apparent contradiction”, as they would say. The contradiction is real and is symptomatic of a Roman fraud in the Bible. It also makes no sense for St. Stephen to address a creature and not God in his last prayer, but that is another fraud that I have removed from Acts 7:58 to focus on the feelings of the saints toward those who killed them. Proverbs 29:27 says that the righteous hate the wicked, the prophecy in Psalm 58:10 confirms those feelings, contrasting Matthew 5:38 with Revelation 6:9 demonstrates based on logic, that the Bible does not deserve the credit that many rulers of various countries of the world give it by swearing with their hand on the Bible when assuming their public offices.
Everything becomes so untrustworthy that it is worth asking, did Stephen argue with Jews or with Romans?, did the Jews stone him or did the Romans stone him but the Romans blamed the Jews?, even: did Stephen really exist?, the Jews did not eat pork, but oh what a coincidence, in Matthew 15:11 the Bible says that Jesus said: they can eat everything, that doesn’t square with the prophecies of Isaiah in the last chapter of the book Isaiah. Do you realize the anti-Jewish tone of the Bible? It has texts from Judaism, but they are denied in its false New Testament.
Now read this:
Revelation 6:9-10 Those who had been put to death for the word of God and for their testimony cried with a loud voice, saying, How long, O Lord, holy and true, dost thou not judge and avenge our blood on them that dwell on the earth?
Stephen is supposed to be one of them, but here he wants to be avenged, he wants the sin of those who murdered him to be taken into account.
Can you conceive of the lion of Judah sharing food, including pork, at a table with Antiochus IV Epiphanes, that king who wanted to Hellenize the faith of the Jews and killed some of them for refusing to eat pork?
Michael says to Samael: “If you are a wolf, then I am a lion!”.
Can you conceive of him saying: “His wickedness is forgiven because he accepted me as his only savior and lord, and because he believed me when I said “eat everything because I am above the law: Deuteronomy 14 and Leviticus 11 are part of the past”, because he believes me when I said: “No to justified revenge, love your enemy because Numbers 35:33 is also part of the past, it is a commandment that stopped being justice with my arrival”, “Eat everything because my “words weigh more than the words of the prophet Isaiah (Isaiah 65, Isaiah 66).”
It does not make sense that the Lion of Judah is that man with long hair who looks like the Greek god Zeus, the god of Antiochus IV of Epiphanes, and that he also said: “Nothing that enters a man’s mouth contaminates him” (Matthew 15:11), because that is an insult to the faith of those seven brothers and their mother, who for love of God’s law regarding forbidden foods were martyred by that Greek king, those martyrs had faith in that by dying for the laws of their God, they would live again to inherit eternal life. Let us remember that those Jews did not want to adopt Greek customs (2 Maccabees 7), but the Romans could get along with such customs, which is why you have what you find in the Bible: myths and Hellenism contradicting Jewish truths: a terrible graft.
“Para la bruja, sin amor.” (No facturo con mi canción pero la disfruto). https://youtu.be/-ofhLE4WkoI
Mitos bíblicos: Esteban es apedreado: Testimonios falsos en la muerte de Esteban por apedreamiento. https://youtu.be/o8zdXT63zjw
Isaías 2:15 La soberbia de los hombres será humillada; y solo Jehová será exaltado en aquel día. https://youtu.be/MVKHy7EJsZI
El amor a los enemigos es un engaño del enemigo de Dios, la negación de la ley que prohibe el consumo de alimentos como el cerdo y el murcielago también lo es; La Biblia tiene mentiras del imperio que jamás se convirtió a la fe que persiguió, el imperio romano persiguió esa fe para destruirla helenizandola. En la versión del evangelio falsificada por los romanos en Mateo 15:11 Jesús nos dice (Para negar la ley en Deuteronomio 14): “Coman de todo porque ya nada de lo que entra en la boca del hombre lo contamina”, los romanos están así acusando a Jesús de algo que como fiel judío nunca dijo: Al igual que Antioco IV Epifanes, ellos tivieron en mente helenizar la verdadera religión. El evangelio fue helenizado por los romanos, como el rostro de Zeus, así nos dicen con las imágenes que era el rostro de Jesús; y la doctrina del griego Cleóbulo de Lindos es la que dice: “Ama a tu enemigo”, pero nos dicen que Jesús la enseñó: Y eso es mentira. Antíoco IV Epífanes asesinó con torturas a ocho judíos, a siete hermanos y a su madre porque ellos se negaron a comer carne de cerdo porque Dios lo prohibe (Levítico 11, 2 Macabeos 7). La profecía en Isaías 65 confirma dos cosas: 1 # Dios ama a sus amigos y odia a sus enemigos. 2# El consumo de carne de cerdo se confirma prohibido. Antíoco, el rey griego: “¿Quieres comer carne de cerdo para que no te corten el cuerpo en pedazos? (2 Macabeos 7:7).” Zeús, el dios griego: “Nada de lo que yo Dios hice es malo si lo recibes rezándome, ¿se van a negar a comer carne de cerdo?, adorénme todos, los que no, vayán al fuego eterno (1 Timoteo 4:3, Hebreos 1:6, Lucas 11:28, Mateo 18:7).” La frase: “Haced el bien a vuestros amigos y enemigos, porque así conservareís los unos y os será posible atraer a los otros.” es de Cleóbulo de Lindos, “ama a tu enemigo es otra forma de decir lo mismo”, pero aquello contradice la ley y los profetas, Jesús respetaba la palabra de Dios, pero los perseguidores romanos no.
3 thoughts on “بائبل کا دفاع کرنا اور سزائے موت کے حق میں ہونا ایک دوسرے سے مطابقت نہیں رکھتا، یہی وجہ ہے کہ میں بائبل کا دفاع نہیں کرتا، میں اس کے تضادات کی مذمت کرتا ہوں، کیا آپ میری مدد کر سکتے ہیں؟”
Comments are closed.