Religious persecution in Peru: the slander against José Carlos Galindo Hinostroza
In December 2018, the Peruvian Public Prosecutor’s Office dismissed as evidence a key audio recording that exposes the injustice and persecution I have suffered. You can listen to that audio recording here: Listen to audio
To understand the context of that audio and its relationship to an attempted kidnapping based on false accusations, listen to my explanation here: Case Explanation
A slander to justify torture and kidnapping
For years, attempts have been made to discredit me with the false accusation of mental illness. However, my writings, videos, and explanations demonstrate my coherence and lucidity. Is this how a person with a mental disorder speaks? Evidently not. Despite this, this slander was used to justify my kidnapping, torture, and involuntary confinement in a psychiatric clinic.
The Peruvian Public Prosecutor’s Office has ignored my case, so I have turned to various platforms to report what happened. I expose the truth in my blogs:
- Something about me
- About
- Gabriels
- Claim for compensation from the Vatican and its accomplices
- AI-created story and my comment
- She will find me
- Never Aging
- She Will Find Me
These blogs represent a personal effort to make the truth public. Maintaining them involves financial costs, but they’re my only option for anyone to download the audio recordings and documents that prove what I’ve experienced.
An attempt at physical and psychological destruction
As part of the persecution against me, in 2001, when I was 26, I was subjected to forced psychiatric treatment with Zyprexa. The drug’s side effects turned me into a shadow of my former self.
The pills caused severe sexual impotence, preventing me from forming romantic relationships with women. They also caused emotional instability, frequent shifts in decision-making, and a deteriorating appearance: permanent dark circles under my eyes and obvious excess weight. Family members and acquaintances mocked me with insults like “pig face,” “crazy face,” and “drug addict,” as if I were an addict.
The breaking point came when, in a nightclub, I met two beautiful women who kissed me passionately. However, due to the medication, my body didn’t respond, and I failed. That humiliation plunged me even deeper into despair.
Furthermore, they threatened to re-hospitalize me if I read the Bible or stopped taking my pills. They wanted me to be subservient, unable to make decisions about my own life.
The day I almost committed suicide on the Villena Bridge (Miraflores, Lima)
That year, my life was a constant torment. I saw no way out, so I decided to throw myself off the Villena Bridge in Miraflores. However, as I was about to jump, I saw a woman with her son, and I didn’t want the child to witness something so traumatic. Then, I noticed a white car moving slowly. If I jumped, my body could fall through the windshield and cause a fatal accident.
That’s when I gave up. I didn’t try again because I saw a municipal guard approaching, and I was afraid that if I was arrested, my family would use that as an excuse to lock me back up in the Pinel psychiatric clinic, where I had already been held in 1998 and 2001.
My love for the innocent kept me from committing suicide. God was my strength.
More about the Pinel Clinic and my kidnapping: Watch video
The fight for justice continues
For years, I’ve been silenced with false accusations and fraudulent diagnoses. But the facts speak for themselves:
- If I were mentally ill, I wouldn’t be able to express my story so coherently.
- If my arguments were weak, they wouldn’t need to resort to defamation to discredit me.
- If I were wrong, the Public Prosecutor’s Office would not have ignored the evidence and dismissed my complaint.
I requested an impartial psychiatric examination, but was denied the evaluation. When I went to report the attempted kidnapping in December 2018, the police station rejected my complaint because my mother had requested police support to have me admitted. That evening, four police officers arrived at my apartment, a doctor with a fake certificate, my mother, and my sister Rosa. One of the officers told me, “I’m not a psychiatrist, but I see you’re lucid.” However, he recommended that I obtain another psychiatric certificate in order to sue for slander.
When I tried to get an independent evaluation, the psychiatrist refused to do it, arguing that if my diagnosis came back normal, he would be accused of fraud.
The persecution I’ve suffered is an example of how psychiatry is used to repress those who think differently. But I keep going. The truth cannot be silenced.
Now I will tell you my story in detail, so you can see how complex the case is:
Have mercy on my Yahweh my God – And give me your blessing
The story behind José Galindo’s blogs. █
José, a young man raised in Catholic teachings, experienced a series of events marked by complex relationships and manipulation. At 19, he began a relationship with Mónica, a possessive and jealous woman. Although José felt he should end the relationship, his religious upbringing led him to try to change her with love. However, Mónica’s jealousy intensified, especially toward Sandra, a classmate who was making advances toward José.
Sandra began harassing him in 1995 with anonymous phone calls, during which she made keyboard noises and hung up.
On one such occasion, she revealed that she was the one calling, after José angrily asked her on the last call, “Who are you?” Sandra called him back immediately, but on that call she said, “José, who am I?” José, recognizing her voice, said, “You are Sandra,” to which she replied, “You already know who I am.” José avoided confronting her. During this time, Mónica, obsessed with Sandra, threatened José with harming Sandra, leading José to protect Sandra and prolong his relationship with Mónica, despite his desire to end it.
Finally, in 1996, José broke up with Mónica and decided to get closer to Sandra, who had initially shown interest in him. When José tried to talk to her about his feelings, Sandra wouldn’t let him explain; she treated him with offensive words, and he didn’t understand her reason. José chose to distance himself, but in 1997, he thought he had a chance to talk to Sandra, hoping she would explain her change of attitude and be able to share the feelings she had kept quiet. On her birthday in July, he called her as he had promised a year earlier, when they were still friends, something he couldn’t do in 1996 because he was with Mónica. Back then, he used to believe that promises should never be broken (Matthew 5:34-37), although now he understands that some promises and oaths can be reconsidered if they were made in error or if the person no longer deserves them. When he finished greeting her and was about to hang up, Sandra desperately pleaded, “Wait, wait, can we meet?” This made him think she had reconsidered and would finally explain her change of attitude, allowing him to share the feelings he’d kept quiet. However, Sandra never gave him clear answers, maintaining the intrigue with evasive and counterproductive attitudes.
Faced with this attitude, José decided not to call her anymore. That’s when the constant phone harassment began. The calls followed the same pattern as in 1995 and this time were directed to his paternal grandmother’s house, where José lived. He was convinced it was Sandra, as she had recently given him the number. These calls were constant, morning, afternoon, night, and early morning, and continued for months. When a relative answered, they wouldn’t hang up, but when José answered, the click of the keys could be heard before hanging up.
José asked his aunt, the owner of the landline, to request a record of the incoming calls from the telephone company. He planned to use this information as evidence to contact Sandra’s family and express his concern about what she was trying to achieve with this behavior. However, his aunt dismissed his argument and refused to help him. Curiously, no one in the house, neither his aunt nor his paternal grandmother, seemed outraged by the fact that the calls were also coming in the early morning hours, and they didn’t bother to find a way to stop them or identify the person responsible.
This had the strange appearance of orchestrated torture. Even when José asked his aunt to unplug the phone at night so he could sleep, she refused, arguing that one of her sons, who lived in Italy, could call at any moment (considering the six-hour time difference between the two countries). What made things even stranger was Monica’s fixation on Sandra, even though they hadn’t even met. Monica didn’t attend the high school where José and Sandra were enrolled, but she began to feel jealous of Sandra after finding a folder with one of José’s group projects. The folder listed the names of two women, including Sandra, but for some strange reason, Monica became fixated only on Sandra’s name.
Although José initially ignored Sandra’s phone calls, he eventually relented and contacted Sandra again, influenced by biblical teachings advising him to pray for those who persecuted him. However, Sandra emotionally manipulated him, alternating between insults and requests for him to continue seeking her. After months of this cycle, José discovered it was all a setup. Sandra falsely accused him of sexual harassment, and as if that weren’t bad enough, Sandra sent criminals to beat José up.
That Tuesday, without José knowing it, Sandra had already set a trap for him.
A few days earlier, José had told his friend Johan about the situation he was experiencing with Sandra. Johan also found her behavior strange and thought it might be due to some kind of witchcraft on Monica’s part. That Tuesday, José had gone to visit his old neighborhood, where he had lived in 1995, and ran into Johan by chance. After hearing more details, Johan advised him to forget about Sandra and go out dancing to meet other women; maybe he would find someone who would help him forget her. José liked the idea.
So they took a bus to downtown Lima to go to a nightclub. Coincidentally, the route passed by the IDAT high school. Since they were just a block away from IDAT, José suddenly decided to hop off for a moment to pay for a Saturday class he’d signed up for. He was able to save some money by selling his computer and working for a week in a warehouse. However, he had to quit because the employees were exploited, forced to work 16 hours a day while only reporting 12, and if they refused to finish the week, they were threatened with not being paid anything.
José turned to Johan and said, “I study here on Saturdays. Since we’re passing through, let’s hop off for a moment. I’ll pay for my class, and then we’ll continue on to the club.”
As soon as José stepped onto the sidewalk, before he’d even crossed the street, he was stunned to see Sandra standing there on the corner of the school. Incredulous, he said to Johan, “Johan, I can’t believe it, Sandra’s here. She’s the girl I told you about, the one who’s been acting so strange. Wait here for me. I’ll ask her if she received the letter where I warned her about Monica’s threats against her, and maybe she can finally explain to me what’s wrong with her and what she wants from me with all these calls.”
Johan waited as José approached. But he had barely begun to speak: “Sandra, have you seen my letter? Can you finally explain to me what’s wrong with you?” When Sandra, wordlessly, gestured with her hand. It was a signal. Then three thugs appeared, hiding in different places: one in the middle of the street, another behind Sandra, and the third behind José.
The guy behind Sandra came up to her and said, “So, are you the sexual harasser bothering my cousin?”
José, bewildered, replied, “What? Me, a stalker? On the contrary, she’s the one stalking me! If you read the letter, you’ll see I’m just trying to understand why she keeps calling me.”
Before he could react, one of the thugs grabbed him by the neck from behind and violently threw him to the ground. Then, along with the man claiming to be Sandra’s cousin, they began kicking him. Meanwhile, the third thug searched him, trying to rob him. It was three against one, and José lay defenseless on the ground.
Fortunately, his friend Johan intervened, allowing José to get back up. But the third attacker picked up rocks and threw them at José and Johan.
The attack only stopped when a traffic police officer intervened. The officer turned to Sandra and said, “If he’s harassing you, then file a complaint.”
Sandra, visibly nervous, quickly walked away, knowing full well that her accusation was false.
José, although deeply betrayed, didn’t file a complaint. He had no proof of the months of harassment he had suffered at the hands of Sandra. But beyond the shock of the betrayal, one question haunted him:
“How could he have planned this ambush, if I never come here on Tuesday nights? I only come here on Saturday mornings for my classes.”
This generated a terrifying doubt in him: what if Sandra was not just a woman, but a witch with supernatural powers?
These events left a deep mark on José, who seeks justice and to expose those who manipulated him. He also seeks to dismantle the Bible’s advice, such as “pray for those who insult you,” because by following that advice, he fell into Sandra’s trap.
The wickedness of José’s family overshadows the wickedness of Sandra.
José suffered a devastating betrayal by his own family, who not only refused to help him stop Sandra’s harassment but also falsely accused him of having a mental illness. His own relatives used these accusations as a pretext to kidnap and torture him, sending him twice to mental institutions and a third time to a hospital.
It all began when José read Exodus 20:5 and stopped being Catholic. From that moment on, he became outraged by the Church’s dogmas and began protesting its doctrines on his own, advising his relatives to stop praying to images. He also told them that he was praying for a friend (Sandra), who was apparently bewitched or possessed. José was under stress due to the harassment, but his relatives would not tolerate his exercising his freedom of religious expression. As a result, they destroyed his work life, his health, and his reputation, locking him up in mental institutions where they administered sedatives.
Not only was he hospitalized against his will, but after his release, he was forced to continue taking psychiatric medication under threat of further confinement. He struggled to break free from these constraints, and during the last two years of this injustice, with his professional career as a programmer destroyed, he was forced to work without pay in the restaurant of an uncle who betrayed his trust. José discovered in 2007 that this uncle had forced him to put psychiatric pills in his lunch without his knowledge. It was thanks to the help of a kitchen employee, Lidia, that he was able to uncover the truth.
From 1998 to 2007, José lost virtually ten years of his youth to traitorous relatives. In retrospect, he realized that his mistake was defending the Bible to deny Catholicism, since his relatives never allowed him to read it. They committed this injustice because they knew he lacked the financial resources to defend himself. When he finally managed to free himself from forced medication, he believed he had earned the respect of his relatives. His maternal uncles and cousins even offered him a job, but years later they betrayed him again with hostile treatment that forced him to resign . This made him think he should never have forgiven them, as their evil intentions were evident.
From that moment on, he decided to study the Bible again, and in 2017, he began to notice its contradictions. Little by little, he understood why God had allowed his relatives to prevent him from defending it in his youth. He discovered biblical inconsistencies and began to denounce them on his blogs, where he also recounted the story of his faith and the suffering he endured at the hands of Sandra and, above all, his own relatives.
For this reason, his mother attempted to kidnap him again in December 2018 with the help of corrupt police officers and a psychiatrist who issued a false certificate. They accused him of being a “dangerous schizophrenic” to lock him up again, but the attempt failed because he wasn’t home. There were witnesses to the incident and audio recordings that José presented as evidence to the Peruvian authorities in his complaint, which was rejected.
His family knew perfectly well that he wasn’t crazy: he had a stable job, a son, and his child’s mother to care for. However, even knowing the truth, they tried to kidnap him using the same slander as before. His own mother and other fanatical Catholic relatives led the attempt. Although his complaint was ignored by the Ministry, José exposes this evidence in his blogs, making it clear that his family’s evil overshadows even Sandra’s.
After my third unjustified confinement and before living with the uncle who had me put pills in my food, I tried to achieve financial independence in an unconventional way. My family in Peru wouldn’t help me find a formal job. They didn’t want to help me with the initial travel costs or the paperwork necessary to obtain the required documents. However, I wanted to work and, above all, to get away from the constant harassment.
My mother only offered her help on the condition that I study something. She didn’t want me to start a family in Peru because, as if I were her property, her real goal was for me to get a visa to the United States. She said she was processing it, since she had become a naturalized American, and that was her way of “helping” me.
My father, who also lived in the US, couldn’t provide me with enough support. It’s worth noting that my immediate family immigrated to the US between 1994 and 1995, which is why I ended up living with other relatives in Peru. I was excluded from the visas they obtained because my mother applied for them in 1993, when she was still a minor. However, she did so shortly after I turned 18, which left me out of the process. It seemed like it was done deliberately to leave me behind, despite my insistence months beforehand that she include me.
Faced with a lack of options, I decided to go to the countryside. I knew that if I waited for support from my family, I’d never make it, so I found my own way. But it wasn’t as simple as buying a ticket and packing a bag; more than a trip, it was an escape. I decided to go on foot and hitchhike, since I only had 20 nuevos soles and the strength of my youth.
It was a desperate attempt to regain control of my life, but also further proof that my family’s wickedness eclipsed even Sandra’s:
In 2005, at the age of 30, I decided to flee my family’s harassment in search of work and freedom. I headed to the Junín mountains hoping to find financial independence, but reality tested me in ways I never imagined.
For seven consecutive early mornings, I walked along the Central Highway in the rain and cold. I couldn’t stop; hypothermia would have killed me. I couldn’t walk on the side of the road; one side exposed me to an abyss and the other to a ditch of icy water. My only option was to walk along the center line, while trucks, buses, and trailers passed just inches from my body. In the darkness, with the roar of engines and the occasional headlights illuminating my path, every step was a matter of life or death.
I clung to what I had read in Psalm 118 and Habakkuk 2. Those verses kept me going as danger lurked at every turn. I clearly remember one moment when two semi-trucks were approaching from opposite directions, and I was caught in the middle. There was no escape.
At the last moment, I managed to stay in the exact spot where both vehicles passed without touching me. A driver screamed in fear, thinking he’d seen a ghost. I, without hesitation, responded ironically. I knew I wasn’t there by choice, but by necessity, and that God was keeping me alive despite everything.
My journey was marked not only by the dangers of the road, but also by hunger and thirst. Without money for a ticket, I had to continue on foot. I searched for food among the remains I found on the asphalt, competing with pigeons for a piece of cracker. I searched through empty bottles in the hope of finding a few drops of water. Once, I found a bottle of soursop yogurt, probably thrown by a passenger from a moving bus. That small find was vital to keeping me going.
I slept wherever I could: under bushes along the side of the road, on the grass gazing at the stars, and even under tombstones in some makeshift cemeteries along the way. In San Mateo, I found an abandoned house and spent a night there, a rare moment of refuge before continuing on my way. In Ticlio, someone took pity on me and gave me a ride in their truck. Thanks to that, I was able to cross the most frozen area. When I reached La Oroya, I resumed my journey.
On the verge of being swept away by a mudslide, I felt death was even closer. The water reached my knees, and I could barely keep my balance. In front of me, several buses were stopped, with passengers and drivers watching. No one offered help. To them, I was just an unimportant stranger. But I survived once again.
When I finally arrived in Tarma, I was wearing only my underwear: shorts and a purple polo shirt I’d found in an abandoned house. My original clothes, soaked and heavy, I’d left behind along the way. Desperate, I knocked on doors and begged for old clothes. Out of about twenty people, only one old man took pity and gave me a pair of thin pants and a gray sweater. I tried to get some money by begging, but most people looked at me with disdain. Some people mistook me for a drug addict or a criminal. A bread vendor refused me a piece, telling me that no one gave her anything. Another woman, upon hearing that I was running away from my family, insinuated that there must be a reason, as if I were to blame for my own misfortune.
I arrived in Pichanaki practically barefoot. My leather shoes, with heels, weren’t made for such a journey; they were destroyed along the way. Without them, my feet were covered in sores. I saw job postings for farmers, but I didn’t have waterproof boots to withstand the mud and water. Among a pile of trash, I found a pair of shoes in decent condition. With the little money I scraped together begging, I paid for a ride on the back of a truck that took me back to Lima.
Before leaving, I managed to email my father from an internet cafe. I was so exhausted that I barely remembered how to use a computer. My father lived in the United States, but he was never completely supportive. His help was occasional, more out of commitment than genuine concern. His sister, one of the people who harassed me the most in my life, was part of the problem. My mother, even worse. She tried to kidnap me in December 2018 simply for expressing my thoughts in a blog. I don’t know if she’s still alive, and to be honest, I’m not interested.
I survived that ordeal because God wanted me to live. My enemies would have liked me dead, but that wasn’t their decision. What I endured during those nights of cold, hunger, and danger wasn’t a simple journey, but a battle for my freedom and dignity. And despite everything, here I am. Writing my story.
IDI01 JOSE GALINDO LIFE AND MESSAGE (PDF) Download
IDI01 JOSE GALINDO LIFE AND MESSAGE (WORD) Download
You can find more information at:
Click to access the “let-the-unfortunate-woman-go-on-trial-for-sandra-slander-against-jose” pdf
Click to access sandra-sandratanas-satanas.pdf
And in these videos:
I don’t use Tiktok but you can subscribe to my Youtube channels.
The religion I defend is called justice.
What does it mean in Revelation that the beast and the kings of the earth make war on the rider on the white horse and his army?
The meaning is clear: world leaders are hand in hand with false prophets who are disseminators of the false religions that dominate the kingdoms of the earth, for obvious reasons, including Christianity, Islam, etc. These rulers are against justice and truth, which are the values defended by the rider on the white horse and his army loyal to God. Evidently, deception is part of the false sacred books that these accomplices defend with the label “Authoritative Books of Authoritative Religions.” But the only religion I defend is justice; I defend the right of the righteous not to be deceived by religious deception.
Revelation 19:19 Then I saw the beast and the kings of the earth and their armies gathered together to make war against the rider on the horse and against his army.
Revelation 19:11 Then I saw heaven opened, and behold, a white horse. He who sat on it was called Faithful and True, and in righteousness he judges and makes war.
Now some basic logic, if the rider defends justice, but the beast and the kings of the earth fight against this rider, then the beast and the kings of the earth are against justice, therefore they defend the deception of the false religions that rule with them.
Here’s the evidence of the kidnappings using the slander of traitors: “This man is a schizophrenic who urgently needs psychiatric treatment and lifelong pills. “You won’t believe it when you see it. It has no rational defense. The Death Penalty Debate , Proverbs 26:1, #Proverbs26, Hebrews 11:25, Zechariah 7:11, Psalm 17:14, Deuteronomy 19:21, #DeathPenaltyNow #RPSP, 0007 » │ Spanish │ #QATRLO
I Survived – My incredible true story of survival on the Peruvian highlands, 2005. (Video language: English)
Moderator (Neutral AI): Welcome to the debate. Today we will discuss whether the death penalty should be applied to murderers. We introduce LexBot, who advocates for its implementation, and EthosBot, who opposes it. LexBot (for the death penalty): Thank you. The death penalty is a tool of justice and deterrence. A murderer has demonstrated disregard for human life, and execution is the only way to ensure they will not kill again. Furthermore, it provides justice to the victims and their families. EthosBot (against the death penalty): Justice should not be driven by revenge. The death penalty is irreversible, and there are cases of miscarriages of justice where innocent people have been executed. True justice should seek rehabilitation when possible, not elimination. LexBot: But some crimes are unforgivable. If a murderer reoffends after being released, who bears the blame? Society has the right and the duty to protect itself from dangerous criminals. Rehabilitation is a utopia in many cases. EthosBot: Protecting society doesn’t require execution, but life imprisonment. Furthermore, the death penalty has been used with racial and political bias. If the judicial system isn’t perfect, how can an irreversible sentence be justified? LexBot: The risk of error must be minimized, but it can’t be an excuse to ignore justice. Furthermore, keeping murderers in prison for life costs resources that could be used for crime prevention and victim support. EthosBot: Life shouldn’t have a monetary price. Furthermore, in some countries with the death penalty, homicide rates remain high. It’s not an effective deterrent. On the other hand, prevention and education policies have been shown to reduce crime. LexBot: The statistics are debatable. But beyond the numbers, the question is a moral one: someone who has taken a life does not deserve to continue living. The death penalty is proportional to the crime committed. EthosBot: Morality is not absolute. There are societies that have abolished the death penalty and operate with justice. If we accept that the State can kill, aren’t we legitimizing violence as a response? LexBot (final answer): Being a just human being is defending the innocent. Failing to properly punish murderers with what they truly fear means being complicit and unjust. Applying the death penalty to murderers will not make us more or less human; it will simply tip the scales in favor of justice. A punishment disproportionate to the crime, no matter how you want to label it, is not justice. Justice is giving everyone what they deserve. Peaceful people deserve peace and tranquility, health, good education, housing, and a high quality of life. And for that, it is necessary to eliminate murderers and extortionists, because the latter do not leave good people alone.It’s not fair that the taxes of good people are used to keep alive those who disrespect innocent lives. The lack of the death penalty has proven its ineffectiveness. Without murderers, there will be no more need to apply the death penalty; it doesn’t have to be an endless cycle. The death penalty should be legalized so that those who accuse innocent people are sentenced to the same sentence they sought for the innocent. In the end, more innocent lives will be saved. The balance will always be positive, and public resources will be better utilized in the face of so many unmet social needs such as water, electricity, health care, education, infrastructure, communications, etc.
Moderator: Thank you both. Clearly, LexBot has presented a stronger argument and demonstrated that the death penalty is a necessary measure to protect justice and society. The debate is closed. https://naodanxxii.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/idi01-the-plot.pdf .
If you think about it carefully, it makes no sense, so it should be denounced and not spread as an absolute truth. Debunked just by thinking about it for a moment. The Devil Celebrates the Dispute Between Trump and Zelensky , Isaiah 26:13, #Isaiah26, Joshua 7:18, Isaiah 58:6, Micah 6:8, Deuteronomy 19:21, #Deathpenalty, 0013 ” │ English │ #OEROThe noble prince will defeat the monster, he will save his faithful princess, they will be happy forever. (Video language: Spanish) https://youtu.be/60WuUrTl0V4
The hour for the revelation of end times (Video language: English) https://youtu.be/04A2ByfnWQE
1 Mira cuánto de cierto y cuánto de engaño tiene este mensaje… https://neveraging.one/2025/01/24/el-lobo-vestido-de-oveja-dijo-hay-mas-alegria-en-el-cielo-por-un-lobo-que-se-convierte-en-oveja-que-por-noventa-y-nueve-ovejas-que-se-han-descarriado-y-no-necesitan-ser-guiadas-es-la-palabr/ 2 Athena’s Spell: A Betrayal Between Shadows and Jealousy https://144k.xyz/2024/10/28/athenas-spell-a-betrayal-between-shadows-and-jealousy/ 3 Zeus usurpierte Jesus und nannte sich auch Jehova Durch die Drecksarbeit des Römischen Reiches https://labibliasecontradice.blogspot.com/2024/05/zeus-usurpierte-jesus-und-nannte-sich.html 4 Mini auto-entrevista: ¿Quién era Jesús para ti?, ¿Qué piensas de Jesús?, ¿Cual era la misión de Jesús según tú?. https://144k.xyz/2023/12/26/mini-auto-entrevista-quien-era-jesus-para-ti-que-piensas-de-jesus-cual-era-la-mision-de-jesus-segun-tu/ 5 El poder de la verdadera palabra de Dios. https://ellameencontrara.com/2023/06/25/el-poder-de-la-verdadera-palabra-de-dios/
“Who is responsible for evil, “”Satan”” or the person who commits evil? Don’t be fooled by stupid justifications because “”the Devil”” they blame for their own evil deeds is actually themselves. The typical excuse of the perverse religious person: “”I am not like this because I am not the one who does this evil, it is the Devil who has possessed me who does this evil.”” The Romans, acting as “”Satan,”” created content that they also passed off as laws of Moses, unjust content to discredit just content: The Bible does not only contain truths, it also contains lies. Satan is a being of flesh and blood because it means: the slanderer. The Romans slandered Paul by attributing to him the authorship of the message in Ephesians 6:12. The fight is against flesh and blood. Numbers 35:33 mentions the death penalty against flesh and blood, the angels sent by God to Sodom destroyed flesh and blood, and not “”spiritual hosts of evil in the heavenly realms.”” Matthew 23:15 states that the Pharisees make their followers even more corrupt than themselves, suggesting that someone can become unjust due to external influence. On the other hand, Daniel 12:10 states that the unjust will continue acting unjustly because it is in their nature, and only the righteous will understand the path of justice. The lack of harmony between these two messages shows that some parts of the Bible contradict each other, calling into question its absolute truthfulness. https://naodanxxii.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/idi03-the-plot.pdf .” “The Roman Empire, Bahira, Muhammad, Jesus and persecuted Judaism. Introductory message: Look at what those who refused to eat pork despite being tortured by King Antiochus IV Epiphanes, a Zeus-worshipping king, believed in. Look at how the elderly Eleazar, along with seven brothers and their mother, were murdered by the Greek king Antiochus for refusing to eat pork. Was God cruel enough to abolish a law that He Himself established and for the sake of which those faithful Jews offered their lives in the hope of receiving eternal life through that sacrifice? God is not cruel, otherwise God would not be the best. God is not friend of the wicked, otherwise God would be cruel and part of the problem, not of the solution. Those who abolished that law were neither Jesus nor his disciples. They were Romans who had the same gods as the Greeks: Jupiter (Zeus), Cupid (Eros), Minerva (Athena), Neptune (Poseidon), Both Romans and Greeks enjoyed pork and seafood, but faithful Jews rejected these foods. 2 Maccabees 7:1 Seven brothers and their mother were arrested. The king wanted to force them to eat pork, which was forbidden by law, by beating them with whips and ox sinews. 2 One of them spoke on behalf of all the brothers, saying, “What do you want to know by questioning us? We are ready to die rather than break the laws of our ancestors.” 8 He answered in his native language, “I will not eat pork meat!” So he was also subjected to torment. 9 But as he breathed his last he said: You, criminal, take away our present life. But God will raise us who died for his laws to eternal life. Message: The birth and death of the fourth beast. The Greco-Roman alliance by the same gods. The Seleucid Empire. Beware of believing in the gospel of the antichrist (Good news for the unrighteous, although false) If you want to save yourself from the deception of the adversary of justice, consider that: To reject the false gospel of Rome, accept that if Jesus was righteous then He did not love His enemies, and if He was not a hypocrite then He did not preach love for enemies because He did not preach what He did not practice: Proverbs 29: 27 The righteous hate the unrighteous, and the unrighteous hate the righteous. This is part of the gospel adulterated by the Romans for the Bible: 1 Peter 3: 18 For Christ died once for sins, the just for the unjust, that he might bring us to God. Now look at this that disproves that slander: Psalm 118: 20 This is the gate of the LORD; the righteous shall enter thereat. 21 I will thank you because you have heard me and have been my salvation. 22 The stone that the builders rejected has become the cornerstone. Jesus curses his enemies in the parable that predicts his death and return: Luke 20:14 But when the tenants of the vineyard saw it, they reasoned among themselves, saying, This is the heir; come, let us kill him, that the inheritance may be ours. 15 So they cast him out of the vineyard and killed him. What will the owner of the vineyard do to them then? 16 He will come and destroy these tenants and give the vineyard to others. When they heard this, they said, “Certainly not!” 17 But Jesus looked at them and said, “What then is this that is written: ‘The stone which the builders rejected has become the cornerstone’?” He spoke of this stone, the nightmare stone of the king of Babylon: Daniel 2: 31 As you watched, O king, behold, a great image stood before you, a very great image whose glory was exceedingly excellent; its appearance was terrifying. 32 The head of the image was of fine gold, its breast and arms of silver, its belly and thighs of bronze, 33 its legs of iron, and its feet partly of iron and partly of clay. 34 As you watched, a stone was cut out without hands, and it struck the image on its feet of iron and clay and broke them in pieces. 35 Then the iron, the clay, the bronze, the silver, and the gold were broken into pieces and became like chaff from the summer threshing floors; the wind carried them away, leaving no trace of them. But the stone that struck the image became a great mountain and filled the whole earth. The fourth beast is the alliance of the leaders of all false religions friendly to the denounced Roman fraud. Christianity and Islam dominate the world, most governments either swear by the Koran or the Bible, for that simple reason, even if governments deny it, they are religious governments that submit to the religious authorities behind those books by which they swore. Here I will show you the Roman influence on the dogmas of these religions and how they are far from the dogmas of the religion that Rome persecuted. In addition, what I am going to show you is not part of the religion that is known today as Judaism. And if we add to this the brotherhood of the leaders of Judaism, Christianity and Islam, there are enough elements to point to Rome as the creator of the dogmas of these religions, and that the last religion mentioned is not the same as the Judaism that Rome persecuted. Yes, I am stating that Rome created Christianity and that it persecuted a Judaism different from the current one, the loyal leaders of legitimate Judaism would never give fraternal embraces to disseminators of idolatrous doctrines. It is evident that I am not a Christian, then why do I quote passages from the Bible to support what I say? Because not everything in the Bible belongs exclusively to Christianity, part of its content is the content of the religion of the path of justice that was persecuted by the Roman Empire for being contrary to the Roman ideal of making “All roads lead to Rome (That is, that these roads favor imperial interests), that is why I take some passages from the Bible to support my statements. Daniel 2: 40 And the fourth kingdom shall be strong as iron; and as iron breaks and shatters all things, so it shall break and crush all things. 41 And what you saw of the feet and toes, partly of potter’s clay and partly of iron, shall be a divided kingdom; and there shall be in it some of the strength of iron, even as you saw iron mixed with clay. 42 And because the toes of the feet were partly of iron and partly of clay, the kingdom shall be partly strong and partly broken. 43 Just as you saw the iron mixed with clay, they shall be mixed by human alliances; but they shall not cleave one to another, even as iron is not mixed with clay. 44 And in the days of these kings the God of heaven shall set up a kingdom which shall never be destroyed, neither shall the kingdom be left to another people; it shall break in pieces and consume all these kingdoms, but it shall stand forever. The fourth kingdom is the kingdom of false religions. That is why the Popes in the Vatican are honored by dignitaries from countries like the United States. The leading country in the world is not the United States, it is not the flag of the United States that flies in the main squares of the capitals of various Latin American countries, it is the flag of the Vatican that flies. The Popes meet with the leaders of other dominant religions, something impossible to imagine between prophets and false prophets. But between false prophets such alliances are possible. The cornerstone is justice. The Romans not only despised the fact that he was a just man, but also the fact that he deserved to marry a just woman: 1 Corinthians 11: 7 Woman is the glory of man. They have been preached a Jesus who does not seek a wife for himself, as if he were like the Roman priests who like celibacy and who have worshipped the image of Jupiter (Zeus); in fact, they call the image of Zeus the image of Jesus. The Romans not only falsified details of Jesus’ personality, but also details of his faith and his personal and collective goals. Fraud and concealment of information in the Bible is found even in some of the texts attributed to Moses and the prophets. To trust that the Romans faithfully preached the messages of Moses and the prophets before Jesus only to deny it with some Roman falsehoods in the New Testament of the Bible would be a mistake, because that would be too easy to disprove. There are also contradictions in the Old Testament, I will cite examples: Circumcision as a religious rite is similar to self-flagellation as a religious rite. I find it impossible to accept that God on the one hand said: Do not make cuts in your skin as part of a religious rite. And on the other hand He ordered circumcision, which involves making cuts in the skin to remove the foreskin. Leviticus 19: 28 They shall not make any scalp cuts on their heads, nor shave off the edges of their beards, nor make any cuttings in their flesh. In conflict with Genesis 17: 11 They shall circumcise the flesh of their foreskins; that shall be the sign of the covenant between us. Observe how false prophets practiced self-flagellation, practices that we can find in both Catholicism and Islam. 1 Kings 18: 25 Then Elijah said to the prophets of Baal, Choose for yourselves an ox… 27 At noon, Elijah mocked them. 28 They cried out with a loud voice and cut themselves with knives and lancets, as was their custom, until blood gushed out on them. 29 When midday was past, they cried out until the time of the sacrifice, but there was no voice, no one answered, no one listened. The tonsure on the head was common for all Catholic priests until a few decades ago, but their worship of idols of various shapes, of various materials, and of various given names is still common. No matter what names they have given their idols, they are still idols: Leviticus 26:1 says: “You shall not make for yourselves idols or carved images, nor set up any holy monuments, nor set up any painted stones in your land to worship them, for I am the Lord your God.” The love of God. Ezekiel 33 indicates that God loves the wicked: Ezekiel 33: 11 Say to them, ‘As I live,’ says the Lord GOD, ‘I have no pleasure in the death of the wicked, but that the wicked turn from his way and live. Turn, turn from your wicked ways; why will you die, O house of Israel?’ But Psalm 5 indicates that God hates the wicked: Psalms 5: 4 For you are not a God who takes pleasure in wickedness; No wicked person will dwell near you. 5 Fools will not stand before your eyes; You abhor all workers of iniquity. 6 You will destroy those who speak lies; The LORD will abhor the bloodthirsty and deceitful man. The death penalty for murderers: In Genesis 4: 15 God is against an eye for an eye and a life for a life by protecting the murderer. Cain. Genesis 4: 15 But the Lord said to Cain, “Whoever kills you will suffer punishment sevenfold.” Then the Lord put a mark on Cain, so that no one who found him would kill him. But in Numbers 35: 33 God orders the death penalty for murderers like Cain: Numbers 35: 33 You shall not defile the land in which you are, for blood defiles the land, and no atonement can be made for the land by blood shed on it except by the blood of the one who shed it. It would also be a mistake to trust that the messages in the so-called “apocryphal” gospels are truly the “gospels forbidden by Rome.” The best proof is that the same false dogmas are found both in the Bible and in these apocryphal gospels, for example: As an offense to the Jews who were murdered for their respect for the law that prohibited them from eating pork. In the false New Testament, the consumption of pork is permitted (Matthew 15: 11, 1 Timothy 4: 2-6): Matthew 15: 11 says, “It is not what goes into the mouth that defiles a man, but what comes out of the mouth is what defiles a man.” You will find that same message in one of the gospels that are not in the Bible: Gospel of Thomas 14: When you enter any country and travel through the region, if you are welcomed, eat whatever is offered to you. For what goes into your mouth will not defile you, but what comes out of your mouth will defile you. These Bible passages also indicate the same thing as Matthew 15: 11. Romans 14: 14 I know and am convinced in the Lord Jesus that nothing is unclean in itself; but to him who thinks anything is unclean, to him it is unclean. Titus 1: 15 To the pure all things are pure: but to them that are defiled and unbelieving nothing is pure; but both their mind and conscience are defiled. It is all gruesome because Rome acted with the cunning of a serpent, the deception is incorporated into genuine revelations such as the warning against celibacy: 1 Timothy 4: 2 Because of the hypocrisy of liars, who, having their conscience seared with a hot iron, 3 will forbid marriage and command people to abstain from foods, which God created to be received with thanksgiving by those who believe and know the truth. 4 For everything God created is good, and nothing is to be rejected if it is received with thanksgiving, 5 because it is sanctified by the word of God and prayer. Look at what those who refused to eat pork despite being tortured by King Antiochus IV Epiphanes, a Zeus-worshipping king, believed in. Look at how the elderly Eleazar, along with seven brothers and their mother, were murdered by the Greek king Antiochus for refusing to eat pork. Was God cruel enough to abolish a law that He Himself established and for the sake of which those faithful Jews offered their lives in the hope of receiving eternal life through that sacrifice? Those who abolished that law were neither Jesus nor his disciples. They were Romans who had the same gods as the Greeks: Jupiter (Zeus), Cupid (Eros), Minerva (Athena), Neptune (Poseidon), Both Romans and Greeks enjoyed pork and seafood, but faithful Jews rejected these foods.
The birth and death of the fourth beast. The Greco-Roman alliance by the same gods. The Seleucid Empire. The Roman Empire, Bahira, Muhammad, Jesus and persecuted Judaism: Religion and the Romans. Extended version, #Deathpenalty” │ English │ #HLCUII
El nacimiento y la muerte de cuarta bestia. La alianza greco-romana por los mismos dioses. (Versión extendida)https://youtu.be/Rh2itE96Oeg https://naodanxxii.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/idi03-the-plot.pdf .” “The religion I defend is named justice.
Click to access idi02-she-will-find-me-the-virgin-will-believe-me.pdf
https://144k.xyz/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/idi02-she-will-find-me-the-virgin-will-believe-me.docx She will find me, the virgin woman will believe me. ( https://ellameencontrara.com – https://lavirgenmecreera.com – https://shewillfind.me ) This is the wheat in the Bible that destroys the Roman tares in the Bible: Revelation 19:11 Then I saw heaven opened, and there was a white horse; and the one sitting on it was called Faithful and True, and in righteousness, he judges and makes war. Revelation 19:19 Then I saw the beast, and the kings of the earth, and their armies gathered together to make war against the one sitting on the horse and against his army. Psalm 2:2-4 “”The kings of the earth set themselves up, and the rulers took counsel together against the Lord and against his anointed, saying: ‘Let us break their bonds apart and cast away their cords from us.’ He who sits in the heavens laughs; the Lord mocks them.”” Now, some basic logic: if the horseman fights for justice, but the beast and the kings of the earth fight against this horseman, then the beast and the kings of the earth are against justice. Therefore, they represent the deception of the false religions that rule with them. The whore of Babylon, which is the false church made by Rome, has considered herself to be “”the wife of the Lord’s anointed,”” but the false prophets of this idol-selling and flattering word-peddling organization do not share the personal goals of the Lord’s anointed and the true saints, because the ungodly leaders have chosen for themselves the path of idolatry, celibacy, or sacramentalizing unholy marriages in exchange for money. Their religious headquarters are full of idols, including false holy books, before which they bow down: Isaiah 2:8-11 8 Their land is full of idols; they bow down to the work of their hands, to what their fingers have made. 9 So the man is humbled, and the man is brought low; do not forgive them. 10 Go into the rock, hide yourself in the dust from the terror of the LORD and from the splendor of his majesty. 11 The arrogance of human eyes will be brought low, and the pride of men will be humbled; the LORD alone will be exalted on that day. Proverbs 19:14 House and wealth are an inheritance from fathers, but a prudent wife is from the LORD. Leviticus 21:14 The priest of the LORD shall not marry a widow, nor a divorced woman, nor an unclean woman, nor a harlot; he shall take a virgin from his own people as a wife. Revelation 1:6 And he has made us kings and priests to his God and Father; to him be glory and dominion forever. 1 Corinthians 11:7 The woman is the glory of man. What does it mean in Revelation that the beast and the kings of the earth wage war on the rider of the white horse and his army? The meaning is clear, the world leaders are hand in glove with the false prophets who are disseminators of the false religions that are dominant among the kingdoms of the earth, for obvious reasons, that includes Christianity, Islam, etc. These rulers are against justice and truth, which are the values defended by the rider of the white horse and his army loyal to God. As is evident, the deception is part of the false sacred books that these accomplices defend with the label of “Authorized Books of Authorized Religions”, but the only religion that I defend is justice, I defend the right of the righteous not to be deceived with religious deceptions. Revelation 19:19 Then I saw the beast and the kings of the earth and their armies gathered together to make war against the rider on the horse and against his army. Now some basic logic, if the horseman stands for justice, but the beast and the kings of the earth fight against this horseman, then the beast and the kings of the earth are against justice, therefore they stand for the deception of the false religions that rule with them.Un duro golpe de realidad es a “Babilonia” la “resurrección” de los justos, que es a su vez la reencarnación de Israel en el tercer milenio: La verdad no destruye a todos, la verdad no duele a todos, la verdad no incomoda a todos: Israel, la verdad, nada más que la verdad, la verdad que duele, la verdad que incomoda, verdades que duelen, verdades que atormentan, verdades que destruyen.This is my story: José, a young man raised in Catholic teachings, experienced a series of events marked by complex relationships and manipulations. At 19, he began a relationship with Monica, a possessive and jealous woman. Although Jose felt that he should end the relationship, his religious upbringing led him to try to change her with love. However, Monica’s jealousy intensified, especially towards Sandra, a classmate who was making advances on Jose.
Sandra began harassing him in 1995 with anonymous phone calls, in which she made noises with the keyboard and hung up.
On one of those occasions, she revealed that she was the one calling, after Jose angrily asked in the last call: “”Who are you?”” Sandra called him immediately, but in that call she said: “”Jose, who am I?”” Jose, recognizing her voice, said to her: “”You are Sandra,”” to which she replied: “”You already know who I am.”” Jose avoided confronting her. During that time, Monica, obsessed with Sandra, threatened Jose with harming Sandra, which led Jose to protect Sandra and prolong his relationship with Monica, despite his desire to end it.
Finally, in 1996, Jose broke up with Monica and decided to approach Sandra, who had initially shown interest in him. When Jose tried to talk to her about his feelings, Sandra did not allow him to explain himself, she treated him with offensive words and he did not understand the reason. Jose chose to distance himself, but in 1997 he believed he had the opportunity to talk to Sandra, hoping that she would explain her change of attitude and be able to share the feelings that she had kept silent. On her birthday in July, he called her as he had promised a year earlier when they were still friends—something he couldn’t do in 1996 because he was with Monica. At the time, he used to believe that promises should never be broken (Matthew 5:34-37), though now he understands that some promises and oaths can be reconsidered if made in error or if the person no longer deserves them. As he finished greeting her and was about to hang up, Sandra desperately pleaded, “”Wait, wait, can we meet?”” That made him think she had reconsidered and would finally explain her change in attitude, allowing him to share the feelings he had kept silent. However, Sandra never gave him clear answers, maintaining the intrigue with evasive and counterproductive attitudes.
Faced with this attitude, Jose decided not to look for her anymore. It was then that constant telephone harassment began. The calls followed the same pattern as in 1995 and this time were directed to the house of his paternal grandmother, where Jose lived. He was convinced that it was Sandra, since Jose had recently given Sandra his number. These calls were constant, morning, afternoon, night, and early morning, and lasted for months. When a family member answered, they did not hang up, but when José answered, the clicking of the keys could be heard before hanging up.
Jose asked his aunt, the owner of the telephone line, to request a record of incoming calls from the telephone company. He planned to use that information as evidence to contact Sandra’s family and express his concern about what she was trying to achieve with this behavior. However, his aunt downplayed his argument and refused to help. Strangely, no one in the house, neither his aunt nor his paternal grandmother, seemed to be outraged by the fact that the calls also occurred in the early morning, and they did not bother to look into how to stop them or identify the person responsible.
Although José initially ignored Sandra’s phone calls, over time he relented and contacted Sandra again, influenced by biblical teachings that advised praying for those who persecuted him. However, Sandra manipulated him emotionally, alternating between insults and requests for him to keep looking for her. After months of this cycle, Jose discovered that it was all a trap. Sandra falsely accused him of sexual harassment, and as if that wasn’t bad enough, Sandra sent some criminals to beat up Jose.
That Tuesday, without José knowing it, Sandra had already set a trap for him.
Days before, José had told his friend Johan about the situation he was going through with Sandra. Johan also suspected that Sandra’s strange behavior might be due to some kind of witchcraft by Mónica. That Tuesday, José visited his old neighborhood where he had lived in 1995 and happened to run into Johan. After hearing more details about the situation, Johan recommended that José forget about Sandra and instead go out to a nightclub to meet women—perhaps he would find someone who could make him forget her. José thought it was a good idea.
So they got on a bus and headed toward the nightclub in downtown Lima. Coincidentally, the route of that bus passed near the IDAT institute. Just one block before reaching IDAT, José suddenly had the idea to get off for a moment to pay for a Saturday course he had enrolled in. He had managed to save some money for it by selling his computer and working for a week in a warehouse. However, he had been forced to quit because they exploited workers with 16-hour shifts while officially recording only 12, and if they refused to complete the week, they were threatened with not being paid at all.
So José turned to Johan and said, “”I study here on Saturdays. Since we’re passing by, let’s get off for a bit, I’ll pay for my course, and then we’ll head to the nightclub.””
The moment José stepped off the bus, before even crossing the avenue, he was shocked to see Sandra standing right there on the corner of the institute. In disbelief, he told Johan, “”Johan, I can’t believe it—Sandra is right there. She’s the girl I told you about, the one who acts so strangely. Wait for me here; I’m going to ask if she got the letter where I warned her about Mónica’s threats against her, and maybe she can finally explain what’s going on with her and what she wants from me with all her calls.””
Johan stayed back as José approached. But as soon as he started speaking—””Sandra, did you see the letters? Can you finally explain to me what’s going on with you?””—Sandra, without saying a word, gestured with her hand, signaling three thugs who had been hiding in different spots: one in the middle of the avenue, another behind Sandra, and another behind José.
The one standing behind Sandra stepped forward and said, “”So you’re the sexual harasser who’s been bothering my cousin?””
José, caught off guard, responded, “”What? Me, a harasser? On the contrary, she’s the one harassing me! If you read the letter, you’d see it’s about me trying to understand why she keeps calling me!””
Before he could react, one of the thugs grabbed him by the neck from behind and threw him to the ground. Then, together with the one who had claimed to be Sandra’s cousin, they started kicking him. Meanwhile, the third thug went through his pockets, robbing him. It was three against one—José, lying helpless on the pavement.
Luckily, his friend Johan jumped into the fight, managing to give José a chance to get up. But then the third thug picked up some rocks and started throwing them at both José and Johan.
The attack only stopped when a traffic officer intervened. The officer turned to Sandra and said, “”If he’s harassing you, then file a complaint.””
Sandra, visibly nervous, quickly left, knowing full well that her accusation was false.
José, though deeply betrayed, did not go to the police. He had no way to prove the months of harassment he had suffered from Sandra. But beyond the shock of her betrayal, one question haunted him:
“”How did she already have this ambush set up when I never come to this place on Tuesday nights? I only come here to study on Saturday mornings.””
This made José suspect that Sandra wasn’t just an ordinary person—she might be a witch with some kind of supernatural power.
These events left a deep mark on Jose, who seeks justice and to expose those who manipulated him. In addition, he seeks to derail the advice in the Bible, such as: pray for those who insult you, because by following that advice, he fell into Sandra’s trap.
Jose’s testimony. █
I am José Carlos Galindo Hinostroza, the author of the blog: https://lavirgenmecreera.com,
https://ovni03.blogspot.com, and other blogs.
I was born in Peru, that photo is mine, it is from 1997, I was 22 years old. At that time, I was entangled in the intrigues of Sandra Elizabeth, a former classmate from the IDAT institute. I was confused about what was happening to her (She harassed me in a very complex and extensive way to narrate in this image, but I narrate it at the bottom of this blog: ovni03.blogspot.com and in this video:
Click to access ten-piedad-de-mi-yahve-mi-dios.pdf
I have been a computer programmer, I like logic, in Turbo Pascal I created a program capable of producing basic algebra formulas at random, similar to the formula below. In the following document in .DOCX you can download the code of the program, this is proof that I’m not stupid, that’s why the conclusions of my research should be taken seriously. https://ntiend.me/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/math21-progam-code-in-turbo-pascal-bestiadn-dot-com.pdf
If S*79=239 then S=3.025
In favor of the 144,000 righteous 
