Cleobulus Spoke, Rome Translated, and Jesus Was Replaced: The Shroud of Deception

The Shroud of Turin: The Face of Zeus and Cleobulus’ Voice in the Bible

Cleobulus Spoke, Rome Translated, and Jesus Was Replaced: The Shroud of Deception

The Shroud of Turin: Zeus’s Image and Greek Wisdom in the Gospel

Jesus Silenced, Cleobulus Exalted: The Great Hellenist Lie in the Bible

From Christ to Cleobulus: Rome’s Gospel of the Greeks

Zeus in Robes, Cleobulus in Scripture: The Hellenistic Hoax

Jesus or Cleobulus? The False Face of the Shroud of Turin

→ The Face of Zeus in the Shroud of Turin: Hellenistic Lies in the Bible

→ Shroud of Turin: Rome’s Idol and the Deception of Hellenism

→ The Deception of the Holy Face: Jesus or Zeus in the Shroud of Turin

→ The Shroud of Lies: Hellenism and the False Image of Jesus

→ Jesus or Zeus? The Shroud of Turin and the Hellenistic Hoax

Only one remains, the other casts a shadow.

 Jose Galindo (https://ellameencontrara.com/2023/07/01/about-me-jose-carlos-galindo-hinostroza/)  Daniel 12:1 The time of the end  May 24, 2025 77 minutes

“Only One Remains”

In the twilight of the digital age, two messages emerged—shaped like ancient scrolls, but glowing with circuitry and light.

From the west came a message in red and cream, forged in the shadows and sealed with the seal of empire.

His words echoed familiar phrases, but beneath them flowed a current of corruption—altered lines, twisted truths. It was Rome’s falsified message, a copy of the sacred, rewritten for power.

Watch the video below titled: The Face of Zeus on the Shroud of Turin: A Faithful Reflection of the Hellenistic Lies in the Bible.

From the east came another message—blue and white, its light steady and serene, like the sky at dawn. It bore no mark of kings or councils, only the silent authority of truth. This was the message of the Book of Judgment, unedited, unbroken, unbroken.

Both found themselves on the brink of division.

There was no sound—only light, and the sudden dissolution of deception. The red and cream message cracked, split, and scattered like ash in a digital wind. Its fragments vanished into nothingness.

But the blue and white message remained steadfast, its code intact. It flickered silently, its words shining even brighter.

Because only one was written to last.

Daniel 2:43 Just as you saw iron mixed with clay, they will mingle by means of human alliances; yet they will not cleave one to another, just as iron is not mixed with clay. 44 And in the days of these kings the God of heaven will set up a kingdom that will never be destroyed, nor will the kingdom be left to another people. It will break in pieces and consume all these kingdoms, and it will stand forever, 45 just as you saw a stone cut out of the mountain without hands, and it broke in pieces the iron, the bronze, the clay, the silver, and the gold. The great God has shown the king what must be hereafter; and the dream is true, and its interpretation is trustworthy.

Only one remains.

 The face of Zeus on the Shroud of Turin: a faithful reflection of the unfaithful Hellenistic lies in the Bible.

 What’s up? If you’re looking to believe in something that has a basis or that has some logical argument, you’ll like this video. If you’re one of those who likes to belong to any group and say amen to any story they tell you, regardless of whether it has any basis or not, this channel is not for you. But if you like logic, if you like reasoning, if you like coherent arguments and dogmas, this channel is for you. This video is for you. If you don’t like to believe for the sake of believing, if you like to believe with foundations. I am not the leader of any religious group. I don’t have a group. I mean, I’m not introducing you to a new religion so you’ll belong to a new religion, nothing to do with it. I mean, I’m doing it on my own. There’s no group, no temple, nothing. I’m simply denouncing the lies I’ve encountered over the past seven years or more, basically that’s it. My goal is to ensure that people who don’t deserve to be deceived are not deceived. Now I’m going to tell you something. Look, for example, let’s suppose that this part of the Bible is true, that Jesus said, “Beware of false prophets,” right? “Beware of false prophets.” Think about it: if Jesus was warning something, was that warning for everyone? Yes or no? No, because that warning wasn’t for the false prophets. Do I make myself clear? I’ll repeat it again so you can better explain: if Jesus warned against false prophets who come dressed as lambs but inside are wolves, think about it: was his message for everyone? because let’s assume that that is part of his message, let’s assume that the part where he warned about false prophets is true, if that part of his message [is] true, obviously it wasn’t in favor of everyone because it was to the detriment of the false prophets whom he was unmasking, you have to think: was the rest of his message then in favor of everyone? Yes or no? Because just as that message was detrimental to the false prophet who was dressed in sheep’s clothing but was a false prophet, so the rest of his message, that is, the true gospel, was not good for everyone, it was a good gospel for some. Good news, but not for everyone but for some and those some… guess who they were: the righteous, they have always been the righteous: Noah the righteous, Lot the righteous, it was never good news or a good gospel for everyone only for the righteous, just like the warning. Obviously, the false prophet who heard the words, “Beware of false prophets who come in sheep’s clothing, but inwardly are ravenous wolves,” didn’t like that, and so on. The true message the Romans were pursuing wasn’t one of universal love; it wasn’t a message that was good for everyone, and all others needed to do was listen to it to feel blessed. It wasn’t a universal blessing.It wasn’t love for the enemy, do I make myself clear? I think that up to here, if you agree with me on this basic logic, then we can move forward, and you’ll agree with me on many things. Now, the person speaking to you was a computer programmer, so logic is my thing. I’m a very good programmer, and I have some algorithms that I’ve placed on my website so that you can see that I’m serious. I mean, I like logic. So, I’ve already taught you one point. Now, let’s continue reasoning. “Gospel,” as I was saying, means “good news.” Justice, what is justice? Justice is a good message, good? For whom, ah? For the innocent. And for whom isn’t justice good? For the guilty. That’s exactly what the true gospel was like, that is, the true gospel was like a message that was good news for the righteous, but it was not good news for the tyrants, oppressors, charlatans, swindlers… and these are the ones who have killed the spreaders of the good news simply because it was not good news for them because they felt identified with Lot’s harassers, with the wicked people who wanted to cause problems for Lot, etc. I mean, that is to say, the Romans felt alluded to when they were described as not chosen, as unjust, so these guys falsified everything, why?, to incorporate a universalist gospel, universal, of global inclusion where anyone can be accepted, love of the enemy that is one of the great lies, of the great lies that the Romans have put in the original message, and obviously, if they dared to falsify the original message that Jesus and his disciples had, they have also meddled with the Old Testament that is in the Bible, I mean, that is to say, what is in the Bible that is called the Old Testament also has manipulations, why do I know this? because I have been reading and I have found serious inconsistencies, very serious, that point to the Romans or to those who were behind the councils, as the authors behind these contradictions, and now the message that is in Matthew 5 of love of the enemy I am going to deny below on this board, take note and search on the internet for the things that you are going to see here, I’m not telling you to necessarily look for my website, search on the internet and you’ll realize on your own that I’m not lying, let’s see, let’s get to the point. As always, the board with the summary of the most relevant messages. This triangle of prophecies refutes the love of the enemy, I can’t tell you everything obviously in a single video there is too much to say, but that’s what my website is for, this one here [NTIEND.ME]. But here I’m going to tell you how I refute the love of the enemy with just three prophecies: Isaiah 42 speaks of the servant of God who brings justice through truth,If you read the entire chapter you will see that God does not love his enemies and you will also see that justice is brought here, right? He will not tire until justice reigns on Earth. He will bring justice. How? With the truth, with the truth. Now this fits perfectly with Daniel 12:1, where the anointed of God, that is, the messenger of God Daniel 12:1 brings justice. Why? Because those who teach justice will shine. In Daniel 12, in Daniel 12 verse 1 a servant of God rises up, coinciding with Isaiah 42:1 [which] also says [that] a servant of God rises up, who would be the same, brings justice, here it speaks of justice and here it speaks of justice, observe in Isaiah 42:13 it says that God rises like a mighty giant and fights and prevails against his enemies, there is no love for the enemy, also Isaiah 42 says that he will guide some along the way, he will guide some, not all; And [it says] that those who say to the images that they are their gods, that is, those who pray to the images, are going to be very confused, why? because there it says “And those who say to the statues “you are our gods” will be extremely confused; Obviously the charlatan is going to tell you that they know that it is not God [the image to which they pray], but the mere fact of praying to an image is already having it as God because that is what the ancients and polytheists did with the statues, they prayed to it because it was a way of worshiping different gods, so they are going to be very confused, why are they going to be confused? Because God confuses them through that messenger who is going to rise at the end time to make the judgment with the truth to bring the justice of Isaiah 42, now the same thing happens here in Daniel 12:1, it says that some are going to be confused forever look in Daniel 12:1-2 I believe, it says [that] some are going to be eternally confused and Isaiah 42 has a part that says: “those who say to the images or molten statues “you are our gods” will be extremely confused”, that is, those who pray to the statues, but not all those who pray to the statues, There are some who pray to the statues that are of the people of God but they do it simply because they do not know the truth, that was my case, I prayed to images when I was Catholic. I was Catholic, but little by little I was investigating and I was liberated, so that is why here in Daniel 12 it says “At that time your people will be delivered, who are written in the book.” It refers to the righteous, the righteous will be saved because Daniel 12:10 says that the unrighteous will continue to be unrighteous and will not change and here what does it say?, “I will guide the blind”, obviously it is not referring to the blind in the literal sense of the word, but it is referring to those who do not see because these who do not see only need information, through the truth he will bring justice, he will guide.God is going to guide the righteous through other righteous people, that’s why Daniel 12:3 says “Those who are wise and those who turn the righteous into righteousness will shine forth,” look at this detail: “those who teach righteousness” that is, it is not just one, there are several who go out to guide the righteous along the right path, [not the unrighteous] because the unrighteous cannot straighten their path, because a wolf is not the same as a lost sheep, a stray sheep is not the same as a wolf, do I make myself understood? That is, the righteous are going to be guided along the right path where the sheep must pass safely, on the other hand, the wolves are going to be scared or hunted, love is not for everyone, the good shepherd would not love the sheep and the wolves. It was the wolves of the Roman Empire who have lied with the story of loving the enemy, why? So that the sheep trusts in the wolf, and the sheep should not trust in the wolf. The sheep does not must believe, the sheep must not believe that, treating the wolf well, the wolf will behave like a sheep and will give it good treatment for good treatment. The wolf looks for the opportunity to devour the sheep, which is why there is a part that has survived the fraud that is in Sirach or Ecclesiasticus 12:1-2, where it says: Do good looking at whom, do not do good to just anyone. In Psalm 109:4-5 there is a warning: there are people who repay good with evil. In other words, treating everyone well because I would like to be treated well does not work, it only works between righteous people; not between righteous and unrighteous people. In other words, the wicked will always repay you good with evil, there is no point in doing good to them because they will betray you anyway. And also, now that we have touched on the subject, the doctrine of loving your enemy is a copy of the phrase of Cleobulus of Lindos, search the internet for Cleobulus of Lindos, there is a page called mundifrases.com, that’s where I found it. You’ll see that there’s a saying from him, from that wise Greek man who says, “Do good to your friends and enemies because that way you’ll be able to keep the former and attract the latter.” That is, it gives you to understand that if you love your enemy, your enemy can become a friend. It doesn’t work, Jesus didn’t teach it, the Romans, who admired the Greeks, have incorporated that phrase of Cleobulus of Lindos into the words of Christ, but Christ never said it, because Christ, if what he said in Matthew 5:17-18 is true, “I have come to fulfill the law of the prophets,” then he would have to be in harmony with the prophecy of Isaiah, and in the prophecy in Isaiah 42 we don’t see a God who loves everyone but only some, just like in Daniel 12:1. Why does the angel of the Lord rise up in Daniel 12:1 in favor of some and not in favor of all? Why would God send his angel only in favor of some at the end time? Be careful, read it yourself, don’t let someone else read it for you, read Daniel 12 verse 1 and the other verses yourself and you will see that God sends an angel in favor of some people, not in favor of everyone,If God loved everyone, the message would say that God sends that angel in favor of all humanity and it is not like that because the love of God is not for all humanity, he has always had chosen ones, all life, and the chosen ones are the righteous, the righteous because the righteous are the ones who teach justice, an unjust person cannot teach you justice because it is something he does not understand and does not value, the righteous can, that is why Daniel 12:3 says what it says. Now let’s go to Psalm 110 the prophecy of judgment where God tells his son “Sit at my right hand until I make your enemies a footstool for your feet”, from there he judges the nations. Who? It is Christ in his return, here it is, Psalm 110, but it turns out that Christ in his return is precisely that character spoken of in Daniel 12:1 and that character spoken of in Isaiah 42:1 and his return is not with the… how can I tell you? [it is not] descending from heaven literally like that [from] the cloud like a bird, a lie because he never resurrected and because he never ascended to heaven, [that] is one of the great lies that I have refuted, that I have dismantled in this blog, on this [web] page here, that you see here. Here I am dismantling the lie of the love of the enemy, but I have dismantled many other lies, this video is not enough to tell you all the lies in the Bible, a product of the deception of the Romans that I have refuted. So here if you read Psalm 110 you will see that God judges, that there are a people who offer themselves to him voluntarily, that is, There are people who voluntarily go to help him, the one who sits at the right hand of God, and there is also a very important event, that judgment produces thousands of deaths or millions, read Psalm 110:6 “He will judge between the nations, he will fill them with corpses,” that is in Psalm 110:6 as a single context. The context of judgment is not good for everyone, as always, it is good for some, not for everyone. Why did the Pope who died say that God loves everyone? Why is he lying? Look, I’m going to tell you something, today in the morning there was a ridiculous comment where a guy was praising the current Pope, I don’t remember what he’s called, I think he’s called something from 14, and I said “Why are you praising him so much?” That guy is deceiving humanity like all the Popes do, and the guy also said that the entire Catholic Church, ([I say this] because I was Catholic too), are as one. No, it can’t be, you can’t put everyone in the same bag, you know why? Because not everyone is to blame, when I was a child and I was [ignorant], I was Catholic too, but I was ignorant, you understand? I just let myself be carried away by the masses and I listened and said “Amen,” because I thought that the majority couldn’t be wrong, my parents, the society where I live, almost 95% of Peruvians were Catholic and I was too, but once I investigated and read then I realized and I began to protest, but what’s the difference? The priest,The cleric has also read what I’ve read, but does he tell you about these inconsistencies? No! He turns a blind eye and continues deceiving people with the story of the resurrection, with the story of loving one’s enemy. Not me. That’s why we’re not all equal. You can’t lump every Catholic into the same bag. I mean, I don’t condemn a person for their religion; I judge them by their reaction to a message of justice. If you show them a message of justice and the guy insists on defending injustice, defending lies, slander, then I judge them. But I can’t say, “No, [that one] is lost [forever],” because I myself was Catholic too. I can’t curse or say that the Catholic is bad because I was Catholic too. I simply would like the good Catholic, that is, the good person who is Catholic, to know the truth so that they can escape from deception, just as I did. Now, a Catholic is also a criminal; a criminal is also Catholic. A drug trafficker, a pedophile priest, also calls himself Catholic. I mean, there are all kinds of Catholics, good and bad. I want to help good Catholics so they’re not deceived. They don’t deserve to be deceived. I consider myself righteous, and I believe there are other righteous men like me, and righteous women. And I don’t want those people to be deceived. There are people who don’t deserve to be deceived, and I’m for them, in their favor. Just like Michael would do, right? A coincidence. But I’m in favor of the righteous, and not just of the Catholic religion, of any religion from which they can free themselves with the truth, so they stop praying to statues, stop repeating false dogmas. I mean, I’ve done such extensive research that I’ve realized that practically the Roman Empire is behind even Islam, and that this Judaism of Israel, which is known as the Judaism of the Jews, the Judaism of today, is not the same as the Judaism persecuted by the Romans. Because I’ve basically discovered that the Romans persecuted a Judaism different from Christianity, different from the Judaism as it is known, the Judaism in which the Jews of Israel believe, for example, different from that religion, different from Islam, different from Christianity, and obviously different from branches of Christianity like Catholicism, completely different from anything known. That’s basically what I’ve concluded from my research. So I’ve realized that the same thing I’ve discovered can be useful to any coherent person who doesn’t like being deceived, so I’ve made a summary in 24 languages ​​where I debunk the main religious deceptions, not only of Christianity, but also of Islam, also of Judaism. What happens is this. I’m going to tell you why, for example, Islam is an indirect work of the Roman Empire. Why are the Romans behind it? Because it has the same lie that is in Christianity:the virgin birth of Jesus that I have denied in total detail on my website I can’t tell you all the details here but I will tell you some things so you can look it up yourself on my website: Isaiah 7 talks about a virgin giving birth: Isaiah chapter 7, and Isaiah says it to King Ahaz, but at no time is he referring to Jesus [to his birth], [he] is referring to King Hezekiah [to his birth], about whom you can see in 2 Kings 18, that King Hezekiah was the Emmanuel that the prophet Isaiah spoke of to King Ahaz, [Hezekiah] was the son, the future son of King Ahaz, read Isaiah 7 there Isaiah [practically] tells him “Do not fear King Ahaz, because those kings that you fear will fall before your son knows how to distinguish good from evil (2 Kings 15:29-30)”, “and the A virgin will give birth, and they will name her son Immanuel. The virgin [of whom] he is talking about the future mother of King Hezekiah, who at that time was a virgin but [who] obviously, for obvious reasons, was going to stop being a virgin after joining King Ahaz, to have King Hezekiah as a son, and this was more or less 700 years before Christ and those things happened with the king of Hezekiah because Emmanuel means God among us but it does not mean God made man among us, nothing to do with it [And Jesus was never God among us because God the son is not the same as God the Father [Psalm 82, John 10:34, Deuteronomy 4:15]], I did not mean “among us” as they have translated it, it means “God is with us defending us”, it is God with us God on our behalf and Hezekiah represented that for the Jews of his time because God was with him and made him prevail against his enemies and with him the prophecy of Isaiah 7 was fulfilled (2 Kings 19:35-37), that is the context Isaiah never referred to the birth of Jesus 7 centuries later and that a woman would continue to be a virgin despite everything. That is a big lie and what’s wrong with people? Most people have not read the Bible to realize the lies, I mean, I’m not saying that the entire Old Testament is the truth and the New Testament is a lie, no, because for obvious reasons the same ones who falsified the message of the New Testament have also adulterated the message of the Old Testament, it’s obvious, if not, it would be very simple to disprove the false gospel if we only guide ourselves from the Old Testament, obviously the manipulation is also in the Old Testament. It’s everywhere, I’m not defending the Bible, I defend some truths that seem coherent, but I’m not defending any known religion, I’m denouncing these things because I don’t want the righteous to be fooled, who do not deserve to be deceived. I think a con man deserves to be fooled, but I don’t want an honest person to deserve to be fooled. And well, what I was telling you is that the same lie that Jesus was born a virgin is in Islam,Islam also defends that Jesus was born a virgin, coincidence? It can’t be a coincidence, since the Roman Empire is behind it, and it turns out that Bahira, Muhammad’s mentor, was a monk from a branch of Christianity, that is, a Christian monk was Muhammad’s mentor, and he told Muhammad that he was going to be a great prophet, what a coincidence? no and remember that Islam has existed more or less since the 7th century, that is to say, Christianity came first, which obviously, Christianity, for the reasons explained: because it says that Jesus rose again, because it says that Jesus was born of a virgin, for the things that I just told you, Christianity is not the religion that Rome persecuted, it is the religion that Rome created by not wanting to accept the true religion that Rome destroyed, and obviously Rome by destroying the true religion did not respect anything, that is to say, current Judaism is not a reflection of the true Judaism persecuted by the Romans, much less Islam, much less Christianity: They are religions created by the Roman people and I have better proof on my website, you go to my website antibestia.com and you will see an Excel file in the description line, that is, you will see the description of the website and at the end there is an Excel file there is a URL of an Excel file, in that Excel file, you put it in the browser and you will be able to download the support for everything that I am telling you in 24 languages, you can also see it on this website [NTIEND.ME], I have eight websites bestiadn.com, penademuerteya.com, lavirgenmecreera.com ellameencontrara.com, and when I say “the virgin will believe me”, just in case I’m not obviously referring to the supposed virgin mother of Jesus, no, I’m not referring to her, I’m referring to an ideal woman that for me, well for my sacred marital purposes. Well, this is a separate topic, the point is that I just showed you that there is no love for the enemy in the final judgment, there is no love for the enemy when God brings his servant to bring justice through the truth, there is no love for all, some will be confused and some will be guided, why? because God does not love everyone equally in Daniel 12:1 God does not send his angel in favor of everyone exactly like in Sodom and Gomorrah, exactly the same. God sent his two angels in Genesis 19, read Genesis 19, in favor of everyone or only in favor of Lot? Another example, the world of Noah, did the angel warn Noah in favor of him only or in favor of everyone else so that everyone gets on the ark? Don’t you see? God has not changed, it is the same God who does not love everyone and if God does not love everyone why does Matthew 5:44-48 say what it says? Because Jesus did not say it, the Romans said it, think about it and if the Romans have dared to put words in the mouth of Jesus that he never said, if they have dared to show us images of their god Zeus and tell us that it is the image of Jesus, what have the Romans dared to do? What else have they not falsified? Think about it,If they have falsified something as rude as the love of the enemy that does not fit with the law or the prophets, that does not fit with anything not even with logic, what else have the Romans adulterated? How many deceptions in the Bible? Here I cannot tell you everything I have seen even in Genesis, from Genesis to Revelation, all the books of the Bible have lies, even some entire books are totally false, it is impressive and good as was being said, I created this video because in my youth I would have liked to find a video like this that I am creating to avoid mistakes and bad decisions that I made by following bad advice such as praying for those who insult you because there was a woman named Sandra who insulted me in a complex circumstance to tell here, and she confused me on purpose, and in my confusion I made the big mistake… instead of getting away from her, [I] prayed for her thinking that the advice of Matthew 5 was good and in the end things turned out worse for me, that’s already I also spoke on my own website. In that same file, I also recount that experience. I don’t want other righteous men or righteous people to make mistakes because of the misinformation these charlatans present as the word of God. It’s not the word of God, it’s the words of the Roman Empire. That’s it. Greetings from Lima, Peru. I’m José.

The statue needs human care to remain clean: how could it care for the one who prays to it, if it cannot even care for itself? The truth bothers the tyrant more than a thousand rebels. The adversary stands up and fights against the angel. , Matthew 20:8, #Matthew20, John 6:69, Psalms 86:13, Genesis 48:19, Deuteronomy 19:21, #Deathpenalty, 0044, 0044 ” │ English │ #AEOX

 Daniel 12 Revelation 18 Habakkuk 2 The Doom of Babylon (Video language: Italian) https://youtu.be/RrgB0aJnQ-A


, The angel was proud, confident that the status quo was guaranteed. The angel arrogantly told his adversary: Worship my image or die! His adversary said: I will not worship your idol, rebellious angel, because God is not so deaf as to require me to pray to him through idols or intermediary messengers. I pray directly to God without the need for intermediaries or mute and deaf images. The proud angel said: If God is on your side and hears your prayers, why are you there beneath my foot? His adversary replied: Who deceived you? You were deceived by your own idol, because here I am to tell you that you are a miserable rebel, I am behind your back. You have clothed yourself in rebellion and, moreover, you have turned your back on me. You have turned your back on me when you turned your back on the justice that I defend. Because the slander against the saints of the Most High, spread by the kingdom you have defended with your weapons, is injustice! Slander is injustice. And that’s why you’re a Satan, for Satan means “the slanderer.” Because the slander against those who refuse to worship your statues, spread by the kingdom you have dedicated yourself to defending with false scales, with your shield and with your sword, is injustice—injustice that you have defended! You have fought for Rome and not for God. You have also fought for Sodom and not for Lot. The adversary of the rebel angels: Who are you? The rebel angel replies: I am Gabriel, the one whom God strengthens because God loves him. The adversary of the rebel angels responds: No! You are not Gabriel. Gabriel is a man loved by God. [Listen well!]. But you are not loved by God. Don’t you read what it says there? (Daniel 9:21, Deuteronomy 22:5, 1 Corinthians 11:14) Daniel 9:21 Gabriel is a man. Deuteronomy 22:5 God hates a man who dresses as a woman. 1 Corinthians 11:14 A man with hair like a woman is a disgrace. Therefore, you are not Gabriel, for God does not hate Gabriel. You are a Satan. (Daniel 9:21, Deuteronomy 22:5, 1 Corinthians 11:14) Therefore… disappear, Satan! The Hellenized image of Christ and the saints —inspired by Zeus and Cupid— reflects a distorted biblical message shaped by Hellenistic influence, promoted by false Roman converts. From this come the pro-Hellenistic lies found in the Bible. Additional Clues: Revelation 9:7-8 Those who follow the rebel angel: Their faces were as the faces of men, and they had hair as the hair of women. Deuteronomy 32:37-42 Long-haired gods are enemies of the God of gods. Psalm 82:1-2 God is fed up with long-haired gods who justify the unjust (An allusion to Zeus and the Greek doctrine of loving one’s enemies (the phrase of Cleobulus of Lindos)). Zeus/Jupiter is a god worshipped by false Roman converts who adulterated many messages for the Bible. Psalms 82:6-7 The saints (short-haired gods, sons of the Most High God) who died when they came as mortals to serve the God of gods (Jesus and the saints died as mortals). The Hellenized image promoted by the Roman Empire is a reflection of the Hellenized gospel promoted by that empire, which persecuted the truth to bear false witness against it and deceived us with its fables: Note: Psalm 69:21 says: “They gave me gall for food, and for my thirst they gave me vinegar to drink.” This is cited as a fulfilled prophecy in John 19:29-30 when Jesus drank vinegar on the cross. But if one reads the full context of Psalm 69, the tone is not one of forgiveness or love for the enemy. What immediately follows is judgment: “Let their table become a trap” (v. 22), and it continues with curses and condemnations. There is no “Father, forgive them” as in Luke 23:34. The Gospels say that Jesus fulfills this prophecy, but they ignore the sequence of judgments that accompanies it. Thus, they present a partial and manipulated reading to sustain an image that does not correspond to the original text. Because of this truth ignored by the falsifiers of the gospel, I defend the death penalty and not the love of the enemy, but of the friend. See more evidence: The Bible, Roman Contradiction or Revelation of God? Luke 20:13–16 Jesus anticipates that they will kill him: “This is the heir; let us kill him, and his inheritance will be ours…” They knew what they were doing And what follows is: “The Owner will come and destroy those tenants” Luke 23:34 But when they kill him, it is recorded: “Father, forgive them, for they do not know what they are doing…” Did they not know what they were doing? Then the true message would be: “God, Owner of the vineyard: do not forgive them, for they did know what they were doing” Because of this truth, I defend the death penalty.
https://gabriels.work/2025/05/10/the-adversary-stands-up-and-fights-against-the-angel/ https://naodanxxii.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/idi02-the-plot.pdf .” Day 170

 The last enemy to be destroyed is death. The Gospel of Thomas 1, Isaiah 25:8 – Death is an enemy. (Video language: English) https://youtu.be/B7TnKMYB1ZU


” I thought they were doing witchcraft on her, but she was the witch. These are my arguments. (https://gabriels58.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/idi02.pdf) – Is that all your power, wicked witch? Walking on the edge of death along the dark path, but looking for the light, interpreting the lights projected on the mountains so as not to make a false step, to avoid death. █ Night was falling on the main road. A blanket of darkness covered the winding path that wound through the mountains. He did not walk aimlessly. His goal was freedom, but the journey had only just begun. With his body numb from the cold and his stomach empty for days, he had no company but the elongated shadow cast by the headlights of the trucks that roared beside him, advancing without stopping, indifferent to his presence. Every step was a challenge, every curve a new trap from which he had to emerge unscathed. For seven nights and mornings, he was forced to advance along the thin yellow line of a narrow road with just two lanes, while trucks, buses and trailers whizzed by just inches from his body. In the darkness, the deafening roar of engines enveloped him, and the lights of trucks coming from behind cast their glow on the mountain in front of him. At the same time, other trucks approached in the opposite direction, forcing him to decide in fractions of a second whether to pick up the pace or remain still in his precarious crossing, where every movement meant the difference between life and death. Hunger was a beast that devoured him from the inside, but the cold was no less merciless. In the sierra, the early hours of the morning were invisible claws that penetrated to the bones. The wind enveloped him with its icy breath, as if it wanted to extinguish the last spark of life that remained to him. He took refuge where he could, sometimes under a bridge, other times in a corner of concrete that offered him a minimum of shelter. But the rain was unforgiving. Water seeped into his torn clothes, sticking to his skin and stealing what little warmth he still had. The trucks continued their march, and he, stubbornly hoping that someone would feel sorry, raised his hand, waiting for a gesture of humanity. But the drivers drove on. Some with looks of contempt, others simply ignoring him, as if he were a ghost. Every now and then, a compassionate soul would stop and offer him a quick ride, but they were few. Most saw him as a nuisance, a shadow on the road, someone not worth helping. On one of those endless nights, desperation drove him to search for food among the scraps left by travelers. He was not ashamed to admit it: he fought for food with pigeons, snatching pieces of hardened biscuits before they could make them disappear. It was an unequal fight, but he was determined: he was not willing to kneel before any image, nor to accept any man as «only lord and savior». He was not willing to please those sinister individuals who had already kidnapped him three times over religious differences, who with their slanders had led him to walk that yellow line. At another time, a kind man offered him a piece of bread and a drink. A small gesture, but in his pain, that kindness was a balm. But indifference was the norm. When he asked for help, many would walk away, as if they feared that his misery was contagious. Sometimes, a simple «no» was enough to extinguish all hope, but on other occasions, contempt was reflected in cold words or empty looks. He didn’t understand how they could ignore someone who could barely stand, how they could watch a man collapse without batting an eyelid. And yet, he kept going. Not because he had the strength, but because he had no other choice. He continued down the road, leaving behind him miles of asphalt, nights without rest and days without food. Adversity hit him with everything it had, but he resisted. Because deep down, even in the most absolute desperation, the spark of survival still burned within him, fueled by the desire for freedom and justice. Psalm 118:17 “”I will not die, but I will live to proclaim the works of the Lord. 18 The Lord has chastened me severely, but He has not given me over to death.”” Psalm 41:4 “”I said, ‘Lord, have mercy on me and heal me, for I confess with repentance that I have sinned against You.’”” Job 33:24-25 “”God will have mercy on him and say, ‘Deliver him from going down to the pit; I have found a ransom; 25 his flesh shall become fresher than in childhood, and he shall return to the days of his youth.’”” Psalm 16:8 “”I have set the Lord always before me; because He is at my right hand, I will not be shaken.”” Psalm 16:11 “”You will show me the path of life; in Your presence, there is fullness of joy; at Your right hand, there are pleasures forevermore.”” Psalm 41:11-12 “”By this, I will know that You are pleased with me: if my enemy does not triumph over me. 12 As for me, You uphold me in my integrity and set me in Your presence forever.”” Revelation 11:4 “”These witnesses are the two olive trees and the two lampstands standing before the God of the earth.”” Isaiah 11:2 “”The Spirit of the Lord shall rest upon him: the Spirit of wisdom and understanding, the Spirit of counsel and might, the Spirit of knowledge and the fear of the Lord.”” ________________________________________ I made the mistake of defending the faith in the Bible, but out of ignorance. However, now I see that it is not the guiding book of the religion that Rome persecuted, but of the one it created to please itself with celibacy. That’s why they preached a Christ who doesn’t marry a woman, but rather His church, and angels who, despite having male names, do not look like men (draw your own conclusions). These figures are akin to the false saints—plaster-statue kissers—and similar to the Greco-Roman gods because, in fact, they are the same pagan gods under different names. What they preach is a message incompatible with the interests of true saints. Therefore, this is my penance for that unintentional sin. By denying one false religion, I deny them all. And when I finish doing my penance, then God will forgive me and bless me with her, with that special woman I need. Because, although I don’t believe in the entire Bible, I do believe in what seems right and consistent to me within it; the rest is slander from the Romans. Proverbs 28:13 “”He who covers his sins will not prosper, but whoever confesses and forsakes them will have mercy from the Lord.”” Proverbs 18:22 “”He who finds a wife finds a treasure and receives favor from the Lord.”” I seek the Lord’s favor incarnated in that special woman. She must be as the Lord commands me to be. If this upsets you, it’s because you have lost: Leviticus 21:14 “”A widow, or a divorced woman, or a defiled woman, or a prostitute, he shall not marry these, but he shall marry a virgin from his own people.”” To me, she is glory: 1 Corinthians 11:7 “”Woman is the glory of man.”” Glory is victory, and I will find it with the power of light. Therefore, even though I don’t know her yet, I have named her: Light Victory. And I nicknamed my web pages “UFOs” because they travel at the speed of light, reaching corners of the world and shooting out rays of truth that strike down the slanderers. With the help of my web pages, I will find her, and she will find me. When she finds me and I find her, I will tell her this: “”You have no idea how many programming algorithms I had to devise to find you. You can’t imagine all the difficulties and adversaries I faced to find you, my Light of Victory. I faced death itself many times: Even a witch pretended to be you. Imagine, she told me she was the light, despite her slanderous behavior. She slandered me like no one else, but I defended myself like no one else to find you. You are a being of light; that’s why we were made for each other! Now let’s get out of this damn place… So this is my story. I know she will understand me, and so will the righteous. https://144k.xyz/2025/03/24/this-is-what-i-did-at-the-end-of-2005-when-i-was-30-years-old/ . https://144k.xyz/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/holy-weapons-armas-divinas.xlsx ” Michael and his angels throw Zeus and his angels into the abyss of hell. (Video language: Spanish) https://youtu.be/n1b8Wbh6AHI





1 ¿Quiénes son los amigos del Diablo y quienes son los amigos de Dios? https://bestiadn.com/2025/04/25/quienes-son-los-amigos-del-diablo-y-quienes-son-los-amigos-de-dios/ 2 Religia și romanii. , 1 Corinthians 14:13, Jeremiah 49:3, Hosea 9:16, Psalms 31:4, Deuteronomy 19:21, #Deathpenalty , Romanian , #SPFBET https://ellameencontrara.com/2025/02/09/religia-si-romanii-1-corinthians-1413-jeremiah-493-hosea-916-psalms-314-deuteronomy-1921-deathpenalty-%e2%94%82-romanian-%e2%94%82-spfbet/ 3 De Bijbels die door katholieken en protestanten worden gebruikt, hebben Romeinse leugens gemeen, een daarvan is de leer van het liefhebben van je vijanden. Valse profeten propageren dergelijke leugens om de doodstraf te bestrijden. https://144k.xyz/2024/08/30/de-bijbels-die-door-katholieken-en-protestanten-worden-gebruikt-hebben-romeinse-leugens-gemeen-een-daarvan-is-de-leer-van-het-liefhebben-van-je-vijanden-valse-profeten-propageren-dergelijke-leugens/ 4 Extorsionador está de acuerdo con el Papa: 1# Dios lo ama a pesar de que él es una mierda que vive como parásito. 2# No merece ser castigado con la pena de muerte a pesar de que él sí castiga con la muerte a los que no le pagan extorsiones . https://penademuerteya.blogspot.com/2024/02/extorsionador-esta-de-acuerdo-con-el.html 5 No soy como aquellos que se arrodillan ante la imagen de la bestia , sus ídolos, tus ídolos! https://itreadsso.blogspot.com/2023/09/no-soy-como-aquellos-que-se-arrodillan.html


“Who is responsible for evil, “”Satan”” or the person who commits evil? Don’t be fooled by stupid justifications because “”the Devil”” they blame for their own evil deeds is actually themselves. The typical excuse of the perverse religious person: “”I am not like this because I am not the one who does this evil, it is the Devil who has possessed me who does this evil.”” The Romans, acting as “”Satan,”” created content that they also passed off as laws of Moses, unjust content to discredit just content: The Bible does not only contain truths, it also contains lies. Satan is a being of flesh and blood because it means: the slanderer. The Romans slandered Paul by attributing to him the authorship of the message in Ephesians 6:12. The fight is against flesh and blood. Numbers 35:33 mentions the death penalty against flesh and blood, the angels sent by God to Sodom destroyed flesh and blood, and not “”spiritual hosts of evil in the heavenly realms.”” Matthew 23:15 states that the Pharisees make their followers even more corrupt than themselves, suggesting that someone can become unjust due to external influence. On the other hand, Daniel 12:10 states that the unjust will continue acting unjustly because it is in their nature, and only the righteous will understand the path of justice. The lack of harmony between these two messages shows that some parts of the Bible contradict each other, calling into question its absolute truthfulness. https://naodanxxii.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/idi03-the-plot.pdf .” “The Roman Empire, Bahira, Muhammad, Jesus and persecuted Judaism. Introductory message: Look at what those who refused to eat pork despite being tortured by King Antiochus IV Epiphanes, a Zeus-worshipping king, believed in. Look at how the elderly Eleazar, along with seven brothers and their mother, were murdered by the Greek king Antiochus for refusing to eat pork. Was God cruel enough to abolish a law that He Himself established and for the sake of which those faithful Jews offered their lives in the hope of receiving eternal life through that sacrifice? God is not cruel, otherwise God would not be the best. God is not friend of the wicked, otherwise God would be cruel and part of the problem, not of the solution. Those who abolished that law were neither Jesus nor his disciples. They were Romans who had the same gods as the Greeks: Jupiter (Zeus), Cupid (Eros), Minerva (Athena), Neptune (Poseidon), Both Romans and Greeks enjoyed pork and seafood, but faithful Jews rejected these foods. 2 Maccabees 7:1 Seven brothers and their mother were arrested. The king wanted to force them to eat pork, which was forbidden by law, by beating them with whips and ox sinews. 2 One of them spoke on behalf of all the brothers, saying, “What do you want to know by questioning us? We are ready to die rather than break the laws of our ancestors.” 8 He answered in his native language, “I will not eat pork meat!” So he was also subjected to torment. 9 But as he breathed his last he said: You, criminal, take away our present life. But God will raise us who died for his laws to eternal life. Message: The birth and death of the fourth beast. The Greco-Roman alliance by the same gods. The Seleucid Empire. Beware of believing in the gospel of the antichrist (Good news for the unrighteous, although false) If you want to save yourself from the deception of the adversary of justice, consider that: To reject the false gospel of Rome, accept that if Jesus was righteous then He did not love His enemies, and if He was not a hypocrite then He did not preach love for enemies because He did not preach what He did not practice: Proverbs 29: 27 The righteous hate the unrighteous, and the unrighteous hate the righteous. This is part of the gospel adulterated by the Romans for the Bible: 1 Peter 3: 18 For Christ died once for sins, the just for the unjust, that he might bring us to God. Now look at this that disproves that slander: Psalm 118: 20 This is the gate of the LORD; the righteous shall enter thereat. 21 I will thank you because you have heard me and have been my salvation. 22 The stone that the builders rejected has become the cornerstone. Jesus curses his enemies in the parable that predicts his death and return: Luke 20:14 But when the tenants of the vineyard saw it, they reasoned among themselves, saying, This is the heir; come, let us kill him, that the inheritance may be ours. 15 So they cast him out of the vineyard and killed him. What will the owner of the vineyard do to them then? 16 He will come and destroy these tenants and give the vineyard to others. When they heard this, they said, “Certainly not!” 17 But Jesus looked at them and said, “What then is this that is written: ‘The stone which the builders rejected has become the cornerstone’?” He spoke of this stone, the nightmare stone of the king of Babylon: Daniel 2: 31 As you watched, O king, behold, a great image stood before you, a very great image whose glory was exceedingly excellent; its appearance was terrifying. 32 The head of the image was of fine gold, its breast and arms of silver, its belly and thighs of bronze, 33 its legs of iron, and its feet partly of iron and partly of clay. 34 As you watched, a stone was cut out without hands, and it struck the image on its feet of iron and clay and broke them in pieces. 35 Then the iron, the clay, the bronze, the silver, and the gold were broken into pieces and became like chaff from the summer threshing floors; the wind carried them away, leaving no trace of them. But the stone that struck the image became a great mountain and filled the whole earth. The fourth beast is the alliance of the leaders of all false religions friendly to the denounced Roman fraud. Christianity and Islam dominate the world, most governments either swear by the Koran or the Bible, for that simple reason, even if governments deny it, they are religious governments that submit to the religious authorities behind those books by which they swore. Here I will show you the Roman influence on the dogmas of these religions and how they are far from the dogmas of the religion that Rome persecuted. In addition, what I am going to show you is not part of the religion that is known today as Judaism. And if we add to this the brotherhood of the leaders of Judaism, Christianity and Islam, there are enough elements to point to Rome as the creator of the dogmas of these religions, and that the last religion mentioned is not the same as the Judaism that Rome persecuted. Yes, I am stating that Rome created Christianity and that it persecuted a Judaism different from the current one, the loyal leaders of legitimate Judaism would never give fraternal embraces to disseminators of idolatrous doctrines. It is evident that I am not a Christian, then why do I quote passages from the Bible to support what I say? Because not everything in the Bible belongs exclusively to Christianity, part of its content is the content of the religion of the path of justice that was persecuted by the Roman Empire for being contrary to the Roman ideal of making “All roads lead to Rome (That is, that these roads favor imperial interests), that is why I take some passages from the Bible to support my statements. Daniel 2: 40 And the fourth kingdom shall be strong as iron; and as iron breaks and shatters all things, so it shall break and crush all things. 41 And what you saw of the feet and toes, partly of potter’s clay and partly of iron, shall be a divided kingdom; and there shall be in it some of the strength of iron, even as you saw iron mixed with clay. 42 And because the toes of the feet were partly of iron and partly of clay, the kingdom shall be partly strong and partly broken. 43 Just as you saw the iron mixed with clay, they shall be mixed by human alliances; but they shall not cleave one to another, even as iron is not mixed with clay. 44 And in the days of these kings the God of heaven shall set up a kingdom which shall never be destroyed, neither shall the kingdom be left to another people; it shall break in pieces and consume all these kingdoms, but it shall stand forever. The fourth kingdom is the kingdom of false religions. That is why the Popes in the Vatican are honored by dignitaries from countries like the United States. The leading country in the world is not the United States, it is not the flag of the United States that flies in the main squares of the capitals of various Latin American countries, it is the flag of the Vatican that flies. The Popes meet with the leaders of other dominant religions, something impossible to imagine between prophets and false prophets. But between false prophets such alliances are possible. The cornerstone is justice. The Romans not only despised the fact that he was a just man, but also the fact that he deserved to marry a just woman: 1 Corinthians 11: 7 Woman is the glory of man. They have been preached a Jesus who does not seek a wife for himself, as if he were like the Roman priests who like celibacy and who have worshipped the image of Jupiter (Zeus); in fact, they call the image of Zeus the image of Jesus. The Romans not only falsified details of Jesus’ personality, but also details of his faith and his personal and collective goals. Fraud and concealment of information in the Bible is found even in some of the texts attributed to Moses and the prophets. To trust that the Romans faithfully preached the messages of Moses and the prophets before Jesus only to deny it with some Roman falsehoods in the New Testament of the Bible would be a mistake, because that would be too easy to disprove. There are also contradictions in the Old Testament, I will cite examples: Circumcision as a religious rite is similar to self-flagellation as a religious rite. I find it impossible to accept that God on the one hand said: Do not make cuts in your skin as part of a religious rite. And on the other hand He ordered circumcision, which involves making cuts in the skin to remove the foreskin. Leviticus 19: 28 They shall not make any scalp cuts on their heads, nor shave off the edges of their beards, nor make any cuttings in their flesh. In conflict with Genesis 17: 11 They shall circumcise the flesh of their foreskins; that shall be the sign of the covenant between us. Observe how false prophets practiced self-flagellation, practices that we can find in both Catholicism and Islam. 1 Kings 18: 25 Then Elijah said to the prophets of Baal, Choose for yourselves an ox… 27 At noon, Elijah mocked them. 28 They cried out with a loud voice and cut themselves with knives and lancets, as was their custom, until blood gushed out on them. 29 When midday was past, they cried out until the time of the sacrifice, but there was no voice, no one answered, no one listened. The tonsure on the head was common for all Catholic priests until a few decades ago, but their worship of idols of various shapes, of various materials, and of various given names is still common. No matter what names they have given their idols, they are still idols: Leviticus 26:1 says: “You shall not make for yourselves idols or carved images, nor set up any holy monuments, nor set up any painted stones in your land to worship them, for I am the Lord your God.” The love of God. Ezekiel 33 indicates that God loves the wicked: Ezekiel 33: 11 Say to them, ‘As I live,’ says the Lord GOD, ‘I have no pleasure in the death of the wicked, but that the wicked turn from his way and live. Turn, turn from your wicked ways; why will you die, O house of Israel?’ But Psalm 5 indicates that God hates the wicked: Psalms 5: 4 For you are not a God who takes pleasure in wickedness; No wicked person will dwell near you. 5 Fools will not stand before your eyes; You abhor all workers of iniquity. 6 You will destroy those who speak lies; The LORD will abhor the bloodthirsty and deceitful man. The death penalty for murderers: In Genesis 4: 15 God is against an eye for an eye and a life for a life by protecting the murderer. Cain. Genesis 4: 15 But the Lord said to Cain, “Whoever kills you will suffer punishment sevenfold.” Then the Lord put a mark on Cain, so that no one who found him would kill him. But in Numbers 35: 33 God orders the death penalty for murderers like Cain: Numbers 35: 33 You shall not defile the land in which you are, for blood defiles the land, and no atonement can be made for the land by blood shed on it except by the blood of the one who shed it. It would also be a mistake to trust that the messages in the so-called “apocryphal” gospels are truly the “gospels forbidden by Rome.” The best proof is that the same false dogmas are found both in the Bible and in these apocryphal gospels, for example: As an offense to the Jews who were murdered for their respect for the law that prohibited them from eating pork. In the false New Testament, the consumption of pork is permitted (Matthew 15: 11, 1 Timothy 4: 2-6): Matthew 15: 11 says, “It is not what goes into the mouth that defiles a man, but what comes out of the mouth is what defiles a man.” You will find that same message in one of the gospels that are not in the Bible: Gospel of Thomas 14: When you enter any country and travel through the region, if you are welcomed, eat whatever is offered to you. For what goes into your mouth will not defile you, but what comes out of your mouth will defile you. These Bible passages also indicate the same thing as Matthew 15: 11. Romans 14: 14 I know and am convinced in the Lord Jesus that nothing is unclean in itself; but to him who thinks anything is unclean, to him it is unclean. Titus 1: 15 To the pure all things are pure: but to them that are defiled and unbelieving nothing is pure; but both their mind and conscience are defiled. It is all gruesome because Rome acted with the cunning of a serpent, the deception is incorporated into genuine revelations such as the warning against celibacy: 1 Timothy 4: 2 Because of the hypocrisy of liars, who, having their conscience seared with a hot iron, 3 will forbid marriage and command people to abstain from foods, which God created to be received with thanksgiving by those who believe and know the truth. 4 For everything God created is good, and nothing is to be rejected if it is received with thanksgiving, 5 because it is sanctified by the word of God and prayer. Look at what those who refused to eat pork despite being tortured by King Antiochus IV Epiphanes, a Zeus-worshipping king, believed in. Look at how the elderly Eleazar, along with seven brothers and their mother, were murdered by the Greek king Antiochus for refusing to eat pork. Was God cruel enough to abolish a law that He Himself established and for the sake of which those faithful Jews offered their lives in the hope of receiving eternal life through that sacrifice? Those who abolished that law were neither Jesus nor his disciples. They were Romans who had the same gods as the Greeks: Jupiter (Zeus), Cupid (Eros), Minerva (Athena), Neptune (Poseidon), Both Romans and Greeks enjoyed pork and seafood, but faithful Jews rejected these foods.
Let’s talk about the king who worshipped Zeus: Antiochus IV Epiphanes was the king of the Seleucid Empire from 175 BC until his death in 164 BC. His name in Ancient Greek was Αντίοχος Επιφανής, meaning “manifest god”. 2 Maccabees 6: 1 After some time the king sent an elder from Athens to compel the Jews to break the laws of their ancestors and to live in a way that was contrary to God’s laws, 2 to desecrate the temple in Jerusalem and dedicate it to Olympian Zeus, and to dedicate the temple on Mount Gerizim to Zeus the Hospitaller, as the people there had requested. 2 Maccabees 6: 18 They wanted to force Eleazar, one of the foremost teachers of the law, a man of advanced age and noble appearance, to eat pork by opening his mouth. 19 But he preferred an honorable death to an unhonorable life and went willingly to the place of execution. 2 Maccabees 7: 1 Seven brothers and their mother were arrested. The king wanted to force them to eat pork, which was forbidden by law, by beating them with whips and ox sinews. 2 One of them spoke on behalf of all the brothers, saying, “What do you want to know by questioning us? We are ready to die rather than break the laws of our ancestors.” 2 Maccabees 7: 6 “The Lord God is watching, and he has compassion on us. This is what Moses said in his song when he reproached the people for their unfaithfulness: ‘The Lord will have compassion on his servants. ’” 7 So the first died. Then they led the second to the executioner, and after they had scalped him, they asked him, “Will you eat something so that your body will not be cut into pieces?” 8 He answered in his native language, “No!” So he was also subjected to torment. 9 But as he breathed his last he said: You, criminal, take away our present life. But God will raise us who died for his laws to eternal life. The song of Moses is a song of love for friends and hatred for enemies. It is not a song of forgiveness for the enemies of God’s friends. It turns out that there is a clue in Revelation that points to Jesus having the same message and that therefore he did not preach love for enemies. Revelation 15: 3 And they sing the song of Moses the servant of God, and the song of the Lamb, saying, Great and marvelous are your works, Lord God Almighty; just and true are your ways, King of saints. Who will not fear you, O Lord, and glorify your name? As you can see, despite the horrible tortures that ultimately caused their death, they chose to die so as not to fail their God. Now, pay attention to this detail: 2 Maccabees 6: 21 Those who presided over the feast forbidden by law and who had known the man for some time took him aside and advised him to have meat prepared by himself that was lawful brought to him and to pretend to eat the meat offered in sacrifice, as the king had commanded. 22 In this way he would avoid death, and they, because of their former friendship for him, would treat him kindly. 23 But Eleazar, acting in a manner worthy of his age, his venerable old age, and his white hair, which were the sign of his labors and his distinction, a manner worthy of his blameless conduct from childhood, and especially worthy of the holy law established by God, answered accordingly, “Take my life at once! 24 At my age it is not worthy to pretend, I do not want many of the young men to believe that I, Eleazar, at the age of ninety embraced a foreign religion, 25 and that because of my hypocrisy and my short and brief life, they should fall into error through me. By doing so I would bring shame and disgrace upon my old age. 26 Moreover, even if I were to escape the punishment of men now, neither living nor dead could I escape the hands of the Almighty. 27 Therefore I am bravely departing this life, that I may prove myself worthy of my old age, 28 and I am leaving the young men a noble example, that I may prove myself ready to die bravely for our venerable and holy laws.” The Greeks were to be “merciful” to those who, under torture, agreed to eat pork, but the faithful did not want to sin against their God no matter the circumstances. This message in the Quran seems to be in line with the policy of King Antiochus IV Epiphanes: “If I torture you, you must agree to eat pork, you must accept my mercy. And so I will stop torturing you. If your God forbids you, He has indicated that in case I torture you and you are forced to do so, you may eat and not feel like a sinner.” The Quran explicitly prohibits the consumption of pork in several verses. One of the clearest is Sura 2: 173, which says: “He has forbidden you only dead meat, blood, the flesh of swine, and what has been sacrificed in the name of other than Allah. But whoever is forced to do so, without desire or excess, commits no sin. Indeed, Allah is Oft-Forgiving, Most Merciful.” (Quran 2: 173) ChatGPT said: The character of Bahira in the story of Muhammad is an interesting one, and has been the subject of debate and speculation. Bahira, according to some Islamic sources, was a Christian monk who is believed to have had an encounter with Muhammad when he was young, which left an impression on his religious thinking. Some accounts suggest that Bahira may have spoken to him about aspects of the Christian religion, and that her influence may have contributed to the ideas that Muhammad later developed in the Qur’an. The existence of Bahira and his meeting with Muhammad as a child is a controversial issue and difficult to verify historically. There is no independent evidence outside Islamic sources that verifies Bahira’s existence or meeting with Muhammad. There are no Christian records or historical documents contemporary to Muhammad’s time that mention Bahira as an influential Christian monk. No archaeological evidence has been found to confirm this either. Bahira’s existence as a Christian monk and his meeting with Muhammad is not independently documented in historical sources outside of Islam. Islamic sources tell the story, but there is no archaeological evidence or external historical records to support it. Therefore, although the figure of Bahira is significant within the Islamic tradition, the veracity of his story remains a controversial and speculative question. So I told ChatGPT something like this: «If I show that claim B, which is defended by group 1, is false, and then I see that group 2 also defends claim B, then I can discredit both groups.» ChatGPT said: Your point is valid in that if a narrative is repeated in different religions and can be traced back to external or historical influences (such as Rome), it could raise questions about the authenticity or intent behind those stories. You said: In your last paragraph, I agree, but many people do not know the prophecies of Isaiah 7, for example, and only heard “Gabriel announced to Mary the virgin birth of Jesus,” that is, they do not know about these discrepancies, they know nothing, but they believe guided by the majority, by the mass media, etc. I think that they can choose what to believe and what not to, but they should be informed of all the details, then they will decide better, that is my objective. [See here what I mean: Note this similarity of stories: Bible – Pay special attention to Matthew 1: 21 “Behold, a virgin shall conceive and bear a son, and they shall call his name Immanuel” (which means “God with us”). You can see in that message a Roman attempt to forcibly link this narrative to a prophecy of Isaiah that has nothing to do with this supposed divine event, which discredits the story completely. Matthew 1: 18 Now the birth of Jesus Christ was as follows: When his mother Mary was espoused to Joseph, before they came together, she was found to be with child from the Holy Spirit. 19 Her husband Joseph, being a righteous man and not wanting to put her to shame, decided to divorce her secretly. 20 While he thought about this, behold, an angel of the Lord appeared to him in a dream and said, “Joseph son of David, do not be afraid to take Mary home as your wife, for what is conceived in her is from the Holy Spirit. 21 She will give birth to a son, and you shall call his name Jesus, for he will save his people from their sins.” 22 All this took place to fulfill what the Lord had said through the prophet: Matthew 1: 23 Behold, a virgin shall conceive and bear a son, and they shall call his name Immanuel (which means, God with us). 24 Then Joseph awoke from sleep and did as the angel of the Lord commanded him and took his wife. 25 But he did not know her until she had given birth to her firstborn son; and he called his name Jesus. https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Mateo%201%3A18-24&version=RVR1960 Luke 1: 26 In the sixth month the angel Gabriel was sent from God to Nazareth, a town in Galilee, 27 to a virgin named Mary, who had been pledged to be married to Joseph, a descendant of King David. 28 The angel came to Mary and said to her, “Rejoice, you who are favored by God! The Lord is with you!” 29 Mary was perplexed when she heard this and wondered what this greeting meant. 30 But the angel said to her, “Do not be afraid, Mary, for God has been gracious to you. 31 You will be pregnant and give birth to a son, and you will name him Jesus. 32 Your son will be great, the Son of the Most High. The Lord God will give him the throne of his ancestor David. 33 He will reign over the house of Jacob forever, and his kingdom will never end.” 34 Mary said to the angel, “I have no husband; how then can this happen to me?” 35 The angel answered her, “The Holy Spirit will come upon you, and the power of the Most High God will surround you. Therefore the child to be born will be holy, the Son of God.” Koran: Passage from the Quran in Surah 19 (Maryam), which speaks of the virgin birth of Jesus: Surah 19: 16-22 (rough translation): And it is mentioned in the Book of Mary, when she went away from her family to a place to the east. And she put a veil between herself and them; then We sent Our spirit to her, and it came to her in the form of a perfect man. She said, “I seek refuge in the Most Merciful from you, if you are God-fearing.” He said, “I am only a messenger from your Lord to grant you a pure son.” She said, “How will I have a son when no man has touched me, nor am I an unclean woman?” He said, “So it will be. Your Lord has said, ‘That is easy for Me; and that We may make it a sign for the people and a mercy from Us; and it was a decided matter.’” So she conceived him, and she retired with him to a secluded place. https://www.quranv.com/es/19/16 Now I will prove that this story is false: According to the Bible, Jesus was born of a virgin, but this contradicts the context of the prophecy in Isaiah 7. The apocryphal gospels, including the Gospel of Philip, also perpetuate this idea. However, Isaiah’s prophecy refers to the birth of King Hezekiah, not Jesus. Hezekiah was born to a woman who was a virgin at the time the prophecy was told, not after she became pregnant, and the prophecy of Immanuel was fulfilled by Hezekiah, not Jesus. Rome has hidden the true gospel and used apocryphal texts to distract and legitimize major lies. Jesus did not fulfill Isaiah’s prophecies about Immanuel, and the Bible misinterprets the meaning of the virgin in Isaiah 7. Isaiah 7: 14-16: This passage mentions a virgin who will conceive a son named Immanuel, which means “God with us.” The prophecy is given to King Ahaz and refers to the immediate political situation, specifically the destruction of the lands of the two kings Ahaz fears (Pekah and Rezin). This aligns with the historical context and timeline of King Hezekiah’s birth, not Jesus’. Demonstrating the inconsistency of the narrative: Isaiah 7: 14-16: “Therefore the Lord himself will give you a sign: Behold, a virgin shall conceive and bear a son, and shall call his name Immanuel. He shall eat butter and honey, until he knows to refuse the evil and choose the good. For before the child knows to refuse the evil and choose the good, the land of the two kings whom you fear will be forsaken.” This passage mentions a virgin who will conceive a son named Immanuel, which means “God with us.” The prophecy is given to King Ahaz and refers to the immediate political situation, specifically the destruction of the lands of the two kings Ahaz fears (Pekah and Rezin). This aligns with the historical context and timeline of King Hezekiah’s birth, not Jesus’. 2 Kings 15: 29-30: “In the days of Pekah king of Israel, Tiglath-pileser king of Assyria came and captured Ijon, Abel-beth-maacah, Janoah, Kedesh, Hazor, Gilead, Galilee, all the land of Naphtali, and carried them away captive to Assyria. Hoshea son of Elah conspired against Pekah son of Remaliah and attacked him and killed him. He succeeded him as king in the twentieth year of Jotham son of Uzziah.” It describes the fall of Pekah and Rezin, fulfilling Isaiah’s prophecy about the desolation of the two kings’ lands before the child (Hezekiah) learns to reject evil and choose good. 2 Kings 18: 4-7 He removed the high places, broke the sacred pillars, cut down the Asherah poles, and broke in pieces the bronze serpent that Moses had made, for until that time the Israelites had burned incense to it. He called its name Nehushtan. He trusted in the LORD, the God of Israel; there was no one like him among the kings of Judah before or after him. For he followed the LORD and did not depart from him, but kept the commandments that the LORD commanded Moses. The LORD was with him, and he prospered wherever he went. He rebelled against the king of Assyria and did not serve him. It highlights Hezekiah’s reforms and his faithfulness to God, showing that “God was with him,” fulfilling the name Immanuel in Hezekiah’s context. Isaiah 7: 21-22 and 2 Kings 19: 29-31: “And it shall come to pass in that day, that a man shall raise one cow and two sheep; and he shall eat butter for their abundance of milk; indeed, he who is left in the land shall eat butter and honey.” / “And this will be a sign to you, O Hezekiah: This year you shall eat what grows of itself, and the second year what springs from itself; and the third year you shall sow and reap, and plant vineyards, and eat their fruit. And the survivors of the house of Judah who are left shall again take root downward and bear fruit upward. For a remnant shall go out of Jerusalem, and a survivor from Mount Zion. The zeal of the LORD of hosts will perform this.” Both passages speak of abundance and prosperity in the land, correlating with Hezekiah’s reign, supporting the interpretation that the prophecy in Isaiah referred to Hezekiah. 2 Kings 19: 35-37: “And it came to pass that night, that the angel of the LORD went out, and smote in the camp of the Assyrians an hundred and eighty-five thousand; and when they arose in the morning, behold, all were dead bodies. Then Sennacherib king of Assyria departed and returned to Nineveh, where he abode. And it came to pass, as he was worshipping in the house of Nisroch his god, that Adrammelech and Sharezer his sons struck him with the sword, and fled to the land of Ararat. And Esarhaddon his son reigned in his stead.” It describes the miraculous defeat of the Assyrians, which was prophesied by Isaiah, showing God’s intervention and support for Hezekiah, further indicating that the prophecy of Immanuel referred to Hezekiah. ] These lies are just a few, there are many more lies in the Bible, the Bible has truths such as that the righteous and the wicked hate each other (Proverbs 29: 27, Proverbs 17: 15, Proverbs 16: 4), but as a whole it does not deserve credit because its content, when decided in the councils, passed through the black hands of Rome.
Wake up, and help me wake up others fit to be awakened! And speaking of virgins, my purpose is clear, that the virgin woman I seek for my marriage believes me and not the false Roman versions of the facts regarding the holy covenant. Signed: Gabriel, the angel from heaven who announces a gospel different from the one preached by Rome, and a Messiah very different from the Zeus preached by the Romans. If you are her and you recognize me on the street, take my hand and let’s go to a secluded place: I will defend you from viper’s tongues! Nothing and no one will stop our mutual love from flowing because God is with us. And even if this ground is no longer there to support our weight, we will always be together.
The birth and death of the fourth beast. The Greco-Roman alliance by the same gods. The Seleucid Empire. The Roman Empire, Bahira, Muhammad, Jesus and persecuted Judaism: Religion and the Romans. Extended version, #Deathpenalty» │ English │ #HLCUII
El nacimiento y la muerte de cuarta bestia. La alianza greco-romana por los mismos dioses. (Versión extendida)
https://naodanxxii.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/idi03-the-plot.pdf .” “The religion I defend is named justice. █ I will find her when she finds me, and she will believe what I say. The Roman Empire has betrayed humanity by inventing religions to subjugate it. All institutionalized religions are false. All the sacred books of those religions contain frauds. However, there are messages that make sense. And there are others, missing, that can be deduced from the legitimate messages of justice. Daniel 12:1-13 — “”The prince who fights for justice will rise to receive God’s blessing.”” Proverbs 18:22 — “”A wife is the blessing God gives to a man.”” Leviticus 21:14 — “”He must marry a virgin of his own faith, for she is from his own people, who will be set free when the righteous rise.”” 📚 What is an institutionalized religion? An institutionalized religion is when a spiritual belief is transformed into a formal power structure, designed to control people. It ceases to be an individual search for truth or justice and becomes a system dominated by human hierarchies, serving political, economic, or social power. What is just, true, or real no longer matters. The only thing that matters is obedience. An institutionalized religion includes: Churches, synagogues, mosques, temples. Powerful religious leaders (priests, pastors, rabbis, imams, popes, etc.). Manipulated and fraudulent “official” sacred texts. Dogmas that cannot be questioned. Rules imposed on people’s personal lives. Mandatory rites and rituals in order to “”belong.”” This is how the Roman Empire, and later other empires, used faith to subjugate people. They turned the sacred into a business. And truth into heresy. If you still believe that obeying a religion is the same as having faith, you were lied to. If you still trust their books, you trust the same people who crucified justice. It’s not God speaking in his temples. It’s Rome. And Rome never stopped speaking. Wake up. He who seeks justice needs no permission. Nor an institution. https://ellameencontrara.com/2025/04/17/el-proposito-de-dios-no-es-el-proposito-de-roma-las-religiones-de-roma-conducen-a-sus-propios-intereses-y-no-al-favor-de-dios/ https://gabriels52.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/arco-y-flecha.xlsx

Click to access idi02-she-will-find-me-the-virgin-will-believe-me.pdf

https://144k.xyz/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/idi02-she-will-find-me-the-virgin-will-believe-me.docx She will find me, the virgin woman will believe me. ( https://ellameencontrara.comhttps://lavirgenmecreera.comhttps://shewillfind.me ) This is the wheat in the Bible that destroys the Roman tares in the Bible: Revelation 19:11 Then I saw heaven opened, and there was a white horse; and the one sitting on it was called Faithful and True, and in righteousness, he judges and makes war. Revelation 19:19 Then I saw the beast, and the kings of the earth, and their armies gathered together to make war against the one sitting on the horse and against his army. Psalm 2:2-4 “”The kings of the earth set themselves up, and the rulers took counsel together against the Lord and against his anointed, saying: ‘Let us break their bonds apart and cast away their cords from us.’ He who sits in the heavens laughs; the Lord mocks them.”” Now, some basic logic: if the horseman fights for justice, but the beast and the kings of the earth fight against this horseman, then the beast and the kings of the earth are against justice. Therefore, they represent the deception of the false religions that rule with them. The whore of Babylon, which is the false church made by Rome, has considered herself to be “”the wife of the Lord’s anointed,”” but the false prophets of this idol-selling and flattering word-peddling organization do not share the personal goals of the Lord’s anointed and the true saints, because the ungodly leaders have chosen for themselves the path of idolatry, celibacy, or sacramentalizing unholy marriages in exchange for money. Their religious headquarters are full of idols, including false holy books, before which they bow down: Isaiah 2:8-11 8 Their land is full of idols; they bow down to the work of their hands, to what their fingers have made. 9 So the man is humbled, and the man is brought low; do not forgive them. 10 Go into the rock, hide yourself in the dust from the terror of the LORD and from the splendor of his majesty. 11 The arrogance of human eyes will be brought low, and the pride of men will be humbled; the LORD alone will be exalted on that day. Proverbs 19:14 House and wealth are an inheritance from fathers, but a prudent wife is from the LORD. Leviticus 21:14 The priest of the LORD shall not marry a widow, nor a divorced woman, nor an unclean woman, nor a harlot; he shall take a virgin from his own people as a wife. Revelation 1:6 And he has made us kings and priests to his God and Father; to him be glory and dominion forever. 1 Corinthians 11:7 The woman is the glory of man. What does it mean in Revelation that the beast and the kings of the earth wage war on the rider of the white horse and his army? The meaning is clear, the world leaders are hand in glove with the false prophets who are disseminators of the false religions that are dominant among the kingdoms of the earth, for obvious reasons, that includes Christianity, Islam, etc. These rulers are against justice and truth, which are the values defended by the rider of the white horse and his army loyal to God. As is evident, the deception is part of the false sacred books that these accomplices defend with the label of “Authorized Books of Authorized Religions”, but the only religion that I defend is justice, I defend the right of the righteous not to be deceived with religious deceptions. Revelation 19:19 Then I saw the beast and the kings of the earth and their armies gathered together to make war against the rider on the horse and against his army. Now some basic logic, if the horseman stands for justice, but the beast and the kings of the earth fight against this horseman, then the beast and the kings of the earth are against justice, therefore they stand for the deception of the false religions that rule with them. https://144k.xyz/2025/02/27/un-duro-golpe-de-realidad-es-a-babilonia-la-resurreccion-de-los-justos-que-es-a-su-vez-la-reencarnacion-de-israel-en-el-tercer-milenio-la-verdad-no-destruye-a-todos-la-verdad-no-duele-a-tod/ This is my story: José, a young man raised in Catholic teachings, experienced a series of events marked by complex relationships and manipulations. At 19, he began a relationship with Monica, a possessive and jealous woman. Although Jose felt that he should end the relationship, his religious upbringing led him to try to change her with love. However, Monica’s jealousy intensified, especially towards Sandra, a classmate who was making advances on Jose. Sandra began harassing him in 1995 with anonymous phone calls, in which she made noises with the keyboard and hung up. On one of those occasions, she revealed that she was the one calling, after Jose angrily asked in the last call: “”Who are you?”” Sandra called him immediately, but in that call she said: “”Jose, who am I?”” Jose, recognizing her voice, said to her: “”You are Sandra,”” to which she replied: “”You already know who I am.”” Jose avoided confronting her. During that time, Monica, obsessed with Sandra, threatened Jose with harming Sandra, which led Jose to protect Sandra and prolong his relationship with Monica, despite his desire to end it. Finally, in 1996, Jose broke up with Monica and decided to approach Sandra, who had initially shown interest in him. When Jose tried to talk to her about his feelings, Sandra did not allow him to explain himself, she treated him with offensive words and he did not understand the reason. Jose chose to distance himself, but in 1997 he believed he had the opportunity to talk to Sandra, hoping that she would explain her change of attitude and be able to share the feelings that she had kept silent. On her birthday in July, he called her as he had promised a year earlier when they were still friends—something he couldn’t do in 1996 because he was with Monica. At the time, he used to believe that promises should never be broken (Matthew 5:34-37), though now he understands that some promises and oaths can be reconsidered if made in error or if the person no longer deserves them. As he finished greeting her and was about to hang up, Sandra desperately pleaded, “”Wait, wait, can we meet?”” That made him think she had reconsidered and would finally explain her change in attitude, allowing him to share the feelings he had kept silent. However, Sandra never gave him clear answers, maintaining the intrigue with evasive and counterproductive attitudes. Faced with this attitude, Jose decided not to look for her anymore. It was then that constant telephone harassment began. The calls followed the same pattern as in 1995 and this time were directed to the house of his paternal grandmother, where Jose lived. He was convinced that it was Sandra, since Jose had recently given Sandra his number. These calls were constant, morning, afternoon, night, and early morning, and lasted for months. When a family member answered, they did not hang up, but when José answered, the clicking of the keys could be heard before hanging up. Jose asked his aunt, the owner of the telephone line, to request a record of incoming calls from the telephone company. He planned to use that information as evidence to contact Sandra’s family and express his concern about what she was trying to achieve with this behavior. However, his aunt downplayed his argument and refused to help. Strangely, no one in the house, neither his aunt nor his paternal grandmother, seemed to be outraged by the fact that the calls also occurred in the early morning, and they did not bother to look into how to stop them or identify the person responsible. This had the strange appearance of orchestrated torture. Even when José asked his aunt to unplug the phone at night so he could sleep, she refused, arguing that one of her sons, who lived in Italy, could call at any moment (considering the six-hour time difference between the two countries). What made things even stranger was Monica’s fixation on Sandra, even though they hadn’t even met. Monica didn’t attend the high school where José and Sandra were enrolled, but she began to feel jealous of Sandra after finding a folder with one of José’s group projects. The folder listed the names of two women, including Sandra, but for some strange reason, Monica became fixated only on Sandra’s name. Although José initially ignored Sandra’s phone calls, over time he relented and contacted Sandra again, influenced by biblical teachings that advised praying for those who persecuted him. However, Sandra manipulated him emotionally, alternating between insults and requests for him to keep looking for her. After months of this cycle, Jose discovered that it was all a trap. Sandra falsely accused him of sexual harassment, and as if that wasn’t bad enough, Sandra sent some criminals to beat up Jose. That Tuesday, without José knowing it, Sandra had already set a trap for him. Days before, José had told his friend Johan about the situation he was going through with Sandra. Johan also suspected that Sandra’s strange behavior might be due to some kind of witchcraft by Mónica. That Tuesday, José visited his old neighborhood where he had lived in 1995 and happened to run into Johan. After hearing more details about the situation, Johan recommended that José forget about Sandra and instead go out to a nightclub to meet women—perhaps he would find someone who could make him forget her. José thought it was a good idea. So they got on a bus and headed toward the nightclub in downtown Lima. Coincidentally, the route of that bus passed near the IDAT institute. Just one block before reaching IDAT, José suddenly had the idea to get off for a moment to pay for a Saturday course he had enrolled in. He had managed to save some money for it by selling his computer and working for a week in a warehouse. However, he had been forced to quit because they exploited workers with 16-hour shifts while officially recording only 12, and if they refused to complete the week, they were threatened with not being paid at all. So José turned to Johan and said, “”I study here on Saturdays. Since we’re passing by, let’s get off for a bit, I’ll pay for my course, and then we’ll head to the nightclub.”” The moment José stepped off the bus, before even crossing the avenue, he was shocked to see Sandra standing right there on the corner of the institute. In disbelief, he told Johan, “”Johan, I can’t believe it—Sandra is right there. She’s the girl I told you about, the one who acts so strangely. Wait for me here; I’m going to ask if she got the letter where I warned her about Mónica’s threats against her, and maybe she can finally explain what’s going on with her and what she wants from me with all her calls.”” Johan stayed back as José approached. But as soon as he started speaking—””Sandra, did you see the letters? Can you finally explain to me what’s going on with you?””—Sandra, without saying a word, gestured with her hand, signaling three thugs who had been hiding in different spots: one in the middle of the avenue, another behind Sandra, and another behind José. The one standing behind Sandra stepped forward and said, “”So you’re the sexual harasser who’s been bothering my cousin?”” José, caught off guard, responded, “”What? Me, a harasser? On the contrary, she’s the one harassing me! If you read the letter, you’d see it’s about me trying to understand why she keeps calling me!”” Before he could react, one of the thugs grabbed him by the neck from behind and threw him to the ground. Then, together with the one who had claimed to be Sandra’s cousin, they started kicking him. Meanwhile, the third thug went through his pockets, robbing him. It was three against one—José, lying helpless on the pavement. Luckily, his friend Johan jumped into the fight, managing to give José a chance to get up. But then the third thug picked up some rocks and started throwing them at both José and Johan. The attack only stopped when a traffic officer intervened. The officer turned to Sandra and said, “”If he’s harassing you, then file a complaint.”” Sandra, visibly nervous, quickly left, knowing full well that her accusation was false. José, though deeply betrayed, did not go to the police. He had no way to prove the months of harassment he had suffered from Sandra. But beyond the shock of her betrayal, one question haunted him: “”How did she already have this ambush set up when I never come to this place on Tuesday nights? I only come here to study on Saturday mornings.”” This made José suspect that Sandra wasn’t just an ordinary person—she might be a witch with some kind of supernatural power. These events left a deep mark on Jose, who seeks justice and to expose those who manipulated him. In addition, he seeks to derail the advice in the Bible, such as: pray for those who insult you, because by following that advice, he fell into Sandra’s trap. Jose’s testimony. █ I am José Carlos Galindo Hinostroza, the author of the blog: https://lavirgenmecreera.com, https://ovni03.blogspot.com, and other blogs. I was born in Peru, that photo is mine, it is from 1997, I was 22 years old. At that time, I was entangled in the intrigues of Sandra Elizabeth, a former classmate from the IDAT institute. I was confused about what was happening to her (She harassed me in a very complex and extensive way to narrate in this image, but I narrate it at the bottom of this blog: ovni03.blogspot.com and in this video:
). I did not rule out the possibility that Mónica Nieves, my ex-girlfriend, had done some witchcraft to her. When searching for answers in the Bible, I read in Matthew 5: » Pray for whoever insults you,» And in those days, Sandra insulted me while telling me she didn’t know what was happening to her, that she wanted to continue being my friend, and that I should keep calling and looking for her again and again, and it went on like this for five months. In short, Sandra pretended to be possessed by something to keep me confused. The lies in the Bible made me believe that good people can behave evilly because of an evil spirit. That’s why the advice to pray for her didn’t seem so crazy to me—because before, Sandra pretended to be a friend, and I fell for her deception. Thieves often use the strategy of pretending to have good intentions: To steal from stores, they pretend to be customers; to ask for tithes, they pretend to preach the word of God, but they preach that of Rome, etc., etc. Sandra Elizabeth pretended to be a friend, then pretended to be a friend in trouble looking for my help, but all to slander me and ambush me with three criminals, surely out of spite because a year earlier I rejected her advances since I was in love with Monica Nieves, to whom I was faithful. But Monica did not trust my fidelity and threatened to kill Sandra Elizabeth, which is why I broke up with Monica slowly, over eight months, so that Monica wouldn’t think it was because of Sandra. But this is how Sandra Elizabeth paid me back—with slander. She falsely accused me of sexually harassing her, and with that pretext, she ordered three criminals to beat me up—all in front of her. I narrate all this in my blog and in my YouTube videos:
I do not wish for other righteous men to have bad experiences like I had, which is why I have created what you are reading. I know this will irritate unrighteous people like Sandra, but the truth is like the true gospel—it only favors the righteous. The evil of José’s family overshadows Sandra’s evil: José suffered a devastating betrayal by his own family, who not only refused to help him stop Sandra’s harassment but also falsely accused him of having a mental illness. His own relatives used these accusations as a pretext to kidnap and torture him, sending him twice to mental health institutions and a third time to a hospital. It all began when José read Exodus 20:5 and stopped being Catholic. From that moment on, he became outraged by the Church’s dogmas and started protesting against its doctrines on his own. He also advised his relatives to stop praying to images and told them that he was praying for a friend (Sandra) who was apparently bewitched or possessed. José was under stress due to the harassment, but his relatives did not tolerate him exercising his freedom of religious expression. As a result, they destroyed his professional life, his health, and his reputation by locking him up in mental institutions where he was given sedatives. Not only was he forcibly institutionalized, but after his release, he was forced to continue taking psychiatric medication under the threat of being locked up again. He fought to break free from those chains, and during the last two years of that injustice, with his programming career ruined, he was forced to work without pay at his uncle’s restaurant. That same uncle betrayed his trust by secretly drugging his meals with psychiatric pills. José only discovered the truth in 2007 thanks to a kitchen assistant named Lidia, who warned him about what was happening. From 1998 to 2007, José lost nearly ten years of his youth due to his treacherous relatives. In hindsight, he realized that his mistake was defending the Bible to reject Catholicism, as his family never allowed him to read it. They committed this injustice knowing he had no financial resources to defend himself. When he finally broke free from the forced medication, he thought he had earned their respect. His maternal uncles and cousins even offered him a job, but years later, they betrayed him again with such hostility that he was forced to resign. This made him realize that he should never have forgiven them, as their bad intentions were clear. From that moment on, he decided to study the Bible again, and in 2017, he began noticing its contradictions. Little by little, he understood why God had allowed his relatives to prevent him from defending the Bible in his youth. He discovered biblical inconsistencies and started exposing them in his blogs, where he also recounted the story of his faith and the suffering he endured at the hands of Sandra and, most of all, his own family. For this reason, in December 2018, his mother attempted to kidnap him again with the help of corrupt police officers and a psychiatrist who issued a false certificate. They accused him of being a “”dangerous schizophrenic”” to have him institutionalized again, but the attempt failed because he was not home. There were witnesses to the incident, and José had audio recordings, which he presented as evidence to the Peruvian authorities in his complaint, but it was dismissed. His family knew perfectly well that he was not insane—he had a stable job, a child, and the mother of his child to take care of. However, despite knowing the truth, they attempted to kidnap him again using the same old false accusation. His own mother and other fanatical Catholic relatives led the attempt. Although his complaint was ignored by the Ministry, José exposes these truths in his blogs, making it clear that the evil of his family eclipses even that of Sandra. Here is the evidence of the kidnappings using the slander of traitors: “”This man is a schizophrenic who urgently needs psychiatric treatment and pills for life.””

Click to access ten-piedad-de-mi-yahve-mi-dios.pdf

https://144k.xyz/2025/03/23/the-day-i-almost-committed-suicide-on-the-villena-bridge-miraflores-lima-because-of-religious-persecution-and-the-side-effects-of-the-drugs-i-was-forced-to-consume-year-2001-age-26-years/
.”

 

Number of days of purification: Day # 170 https://144k.xyz/2024/12/16/this-is-the-10th-day-pork-ingredient-of-wonton-filling-goodbye-chifa-no-more-pork-broth-in-mid-2017-after-researching-i-decided-not-to-eat-pork-anymore-but-just-the/

I have been a computer programmer, I like logic, in Turbo Pascal I created a program capable of producing basic algebra formulas at random, similar to the formula below. In the following document in .DOCX you can download the code of the program, this is proof that I’m not stupid, that’s why the conclusions of my research should be taken seriously. https://ntiend.me/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/math21-progam-code-in-turbo-pascal-bestiadn-dot-com.pdf

If N*22=078 then N=3.545


 

“Cupid is condemned to hell along with the other pagan gods (The fallen angels for their rebellion against justice, sent to eternal punishment). █
Quoting these passages does not mean defending the entire Bible. If 1 John 5:19 says that “the whole world is under the power of the evil one,” but rulers swear on the Bible, then the Devil rules with them. If the Devil rules with them, then fraud also rules with them. Therefore, the Bible contains part of that fraud, camouflaged among truths. By connecting those truths, we can expose their deceptions. Righteous people need to know these truths so that, if they have been deceived by lies added to the Bible or other similar books, they can free themselves from them. Daniel 12:7 And I heard the man clothed in linen, who was above the waters of the river, when he raised his right hand and his left hand to heaven and swore by Him who lives forever that it shall be for a time, times, and half a time. And when the power of the holy people is completely shattered, all these things shall be finished. Considering that ‘Devil’ means ‘Slanderer,’ it is natural to expect that the Roman persecutors, being the adversaries of the saints, later bore false witness against the saints and their messages. Thus, they themselves are the Devil, and not an intangible entity that enters and exits people, as they made us believe precisely with passages like Luke 22:3 (“Then Satan entered Judas…”), Mark 5:12-13 (the demons entering the pigs), and John 13:27 (“After the morsel, Satan entered him”). This is my purpose: to help righteous people not waste their power believing in the lies of impostors who have adulterated the original message, which never asked anyone to kneel before anything or pray to anything that had ever been visible. It is no coincidence that in this image, promoted by the Roman Church, Cupid appears alongside other pagan gods. They have given the names of the true saints to these false gods, but look at how these men dress and how they wear their long hair. All this goes against faithfulness to God’s laws because it is a sign of rebellion, a sign of the fallen angels (Deuteronomy 22:5).
The serpent, the devil, or Satan (the slanderer) in hell (Isaiah 66:24, Mark 9:44). Matthew 25:41: “Then he will also say to those on his left: ‘Depart from me, you cursed, into the eternal fire that has been prepared for the devil and his angels’.” Hell: the eternal fire prepared for the serpent and his angels (Revelation 12:7-12), for having combined truths with heresies in the Bible, the Quran, the Torah, and for having created false forbidden gospels that they called apocryphal, to give credibility to lies in the false sacred books, all in rebellion against justice.
Book of Enoch 95:6: “Woe to you, false witnesses and to those who weigh the price of injustice, for you will perish suddenly!” Book of Enoch 95:7: “Woe to you, unjust ones who persecute the righteous, for you yourselves will be handed over and persecuted because of that injustice, and the burden of your guilt will fall upon you!” Proverbs 11:8: “The righteous is delivered from trouble, and the wicked comes in his place.” Proverbs 16:4: “The Lord has made all things for Himself, even the wicked for the day of doom.” Book of Enoch 94:10: “Unjust ones, I say to you that He who created you will overthrow you; upon your ruin, God will have no mercy, but rather, God will rejoice in your destruction.” Satan and his angels in hell: the second death. They deserve it for lying against Christ and His faithful disciples, accusing them of being the authors of Rome’s blasphemies in the Bible, such as love for the devil (the enemy). Isaiah 66:24: “And they shall go out and look upon the corpses of the men who have rebelled against me; for their worm shall never die, nor shall their fire be quenched, and they shall be abhorrent to all flesh.” Mark 9:44: “Where their worm does not die, and the fire is never quenched.” Revelation 20:14: “Then Death and Hades were cast into the lake of fire. This is the second death: the lake of fire.”
Yahvé se burla de sus enemigos para favorecer a su pueblo (su santo monte) . Quita primero los mensajes de la cizaña en la Biblia para que luego le puedas decir al trigo: Este es el mensaje que favorece al trigo, esta es la justicia. – Escrito y publicado por: El enemigo del Diablo . https://ovni03.blogspot.com/2023/06/yahve-se-burla-de-sus-enemigos-para.html No todo es verdad en la Biblia, la Biblia tiene mentiras del imperio romano (Daniel 8:25), pero las verdades en la Biblia se juntan entre sí armoniosamente como piezas de un mismo rompecabezas https://elovni01.blogspot.com/2023/04/no-todo-es-verdad-en-la-biblia-la.html El rollo volador – Zacarías 5, un objeto rectangular… que llega lejos volando. https://videos-serie-fr.blogspot.com/2023/05/el-rollo-volador-zacarias-5-un-objeto.html Si le prophète Joseph et la femme de Potiphar se réincarnaient, elle le calomnierait à nouveau, et il se défendrait ainsi contre ses fausses accusations. https://ntiend.me/2024/08/11/si-le-prophete-joseph-et-la-femme-de-potiphar-se-reincarnaient-elle-le-calomnierait-a-nouveau-et-il-se-defendrait-ainsi-contre-ses-fausses-accusations/ Primero que nada, citaré esta profecía: Dios está en la reunión de los dioses; En medio de los dioses juzga. https://ufo21-88.blogspot.com/2023/12/primero-que-nada-citare-esta-profecia.html Seien Sie vorsichtig, diese Botschaft ist falsch: Epheser 6:12 Denn unser Kampf richtet sich nicht gegen Fleisch und Blut, sondern gegen Fürstentümer, gegen Gewalten, gegen die Herrscher dieser finsteren Welt, gegen böse Geister in den himmlischen Örtern. https://gabriels.work/2024/07/27/seien-sie-vorsichtig-diese-botschaft-ist-falsch-epheser-612-denn-unser-kampf-richtet-sich-nicht-gegen-fleisch-und-blut-sondern-gegen-furstentumer-gegen-gewalten-gegen-die-herrscher-dieser-finste/ Satanás significa calumniador, entonces: Satanás, El Diablo, El gran Dragón, o la serpiente antigua es un calumniador y tiene como adoradores a los calumniadores https://ovni03.blogspot.com/2023/07/satanas-significa-calumniador-entonces.html Ang kasamaan ng pamilya ni Jose ay mas malala kaysa kay Sandra https://144k.xyz/2025/03/10/ang-kasamaan-ng-pamilya-ni-jose-ay-mas-malala-kaysa-kay-sandra/ هل هناك نبوءات عن التناسخ ، ودينونة الله ، والتجديد والخلود لمنتصري الدينونة ، والعفن الأبدي في الألم للخاسرين من الدينونة؟ https://ntiend.me/2023/05/19/%d9%87%d9%84-%d9%87%d9%86%d8%a7%d9%83-%d9%86%d8%a8%d9%88%d8%a1%d8%a7%d8%aa-%d8%b9%d9%86-%d8%a7%d9%84%d8%aa%d9%86%d8%a7%d8%b3%d8%ae-%d8%8c-%d9%88%d8%af%d9%8a%d9%86%d9%88%d9%86%d8%a9-%d8%a7%d9%84%d9%84/ L’Évangile de Pierre et la Prophétie Adulturée : L’Immortalité, le Rajeunissement et la Foi Perdue Retrouvée. , 2 Rois 24:5, Zacharie 9:8, Apocalypse 12:11, Jean 7:37, Deutéronome 19:21, #Peinedemort , 0010″” , French , #UUGRO https://neveraging.one/2025/02/24/levangile-de-pierre-et-la-prophetie-adulturee-limmortalite-le-rajeunissement-et-la-foi-perdue-retrouvee-2-rois-245-zacharie-98-apocalypse-1211-jean-737-deuteronome-1921-peinedemor/ ¿Acaso el rey de reyes y señor de señores no tiene novia?, que idiotas son sus enemigos… él no es el rey de Sodoma… Entiéndanme los 144000 que este trabajo es inspirado en el amor de la virgen, por eso ella me encontrará porque yo la busco y ella me busca también. https://lavirgenmecreera.blogspot.com/2023/11/entiendanme-los-144000-que-este-trabajo.html No soy ateo, al contrario soy creyente en Dios y por ello estoy indignado con esta estafa acerca del plan de Dios, por eso el título de este artículo es: El fraude de los romanos en la Biblia explicado como quizás nadie más lo ha hecho jamás. https://lavirgenmecreera.com/2024/01/06/no-soy-ateo-al-contrario-soy-creyente-en-dios-y-por-ello-estoy-indignado-con-esta-estafa-acerca-del-plan-de-dios-por-eso-el-titulo-de-este-articulo-es-el-fraude-de-los-romanos-en-la-biblia-explic/