I am not a defender of the Bible, but an analyst of it, due to serious contradictions. When false witnesses recount their actions, one of the clearest signs of their lies is the inconsistency of their own words. They fear reasoned debate; that's why they flee from it. They demand submission through blind faith, because reason will never defend them. They demonize their critics, attack those who speak coherently, but never refute their arguments, because they know they are irrefutable. Thinking about whether it's truly possible to walk on water makes you doubt, and doubt—according to them—separates you from God. Thus, they teach you not to think, to believe without reason. Because a mind that doesn't question obeys… and one that obeys without thinking is the easiest to deceive. "As we can infer after reading Isaiah 63:3-5, Isaiah 11:1-5, and Revelation 19:11-19, doesn't the rider on the white horse advocate 'an eye for an eye'?" If you acknowledge that this is the case, then who is this long-haired man who strangely resembles the Greek god Zeus and brings a doctrine of loving one's enemies—a doctrine that, curiously, is a phrase coined by a Greek named Cleobulus of Lindos? Don't you think he will fall into the sea of fantasies he invented, which were then passed off as God's words? A faithful friend deserves the love of the faithful, but does an enemy also deserve it? Do you think that was actually said by the faithful friend, or by the unfaithful Roman Empire that persecuted him? Can the unjust become friends with the righteous? If so, why does Daniel 12:10 say what it says, and why doesn't the rider on the white horse make peace with them instead of waging war against them? If I've made you think… the false witnesses I mentioned at the beginning didn't like that. Many travel behind images or to spread contradictory messages, I did not find anyone to help me denounce the inconsistencies and injustices presented as sacred by the Roman Empire, so I think that there are few who would help me, as few as 144K in 8K Millions. Unknown's avatar She will find me; the virgin and righteous woman of the gate of Jehovah will indeed believe me. Read and understand https://shewillfind.me/the-principal-message-el-mensaje-principal/ To say that even one of the saints chose celibacy and called it a “gift” is a vile slander of the serpent incarnated in the false saints that Rome secretly introduced to destroy the true religion. I will not consent to evil thoughts, such as those that might make me believe it is impossible to successfully refute that slander of the Roman Empire and its false saints, who tell us that the glory of the reward in the kingdom of heaven will consist of righteous men alone, instead of being united in marriage with women, according to the accusation in Matthew 22:30. Nor will I accept that lie which claims that the saints would renounce the glory of marriage with women in order to embrace celibacy (1 Corinthians 7:1 and 1 Corinthians 7:9-10). Nor will I accept the slander that says they conceived impure thoughts, like those in Matthew 5:11 and 1 Timothy 4:1-6, where they are accused of promoting the consumption of foods that God called unclean and forbade forever, such as pork, shellfish, or bat meat. Nor will I allow people to believe lies like those in Luke 23:34 and Ephesians 3:7, which tell us that the righteous loved their enemies and died preaching undeserved love. In this sense, if that were true, why do they ask for vengeance against those who killed them in Revelation 6? There is a direct contradiction between Acts 7:57–60 and Revelation 6:9–10, because one of the two is the lie of their enemy. If God decreed “an eye for an eye” against the enemies of the righteous in Deuteronomy 19:20–21, it is because that is justice, since justice means giving each one what they deserve — and the Roman Empire was anything but just. This blog has two domains that evoke these messages: “she will find me” and “the virgin will believe me,” because I want to reflect my desires and, at the same time, defend the desires of righteous men, clearly expressed here: 1 Corinthians 11:7 – The woman is the glory of man. Leviticus 21:13–15 – He shall take a virgin woman as wife. He shall not take a widow, a divorced woman, a dishonored one, or a prostitute, but shall take from his own people a virgin for a wife, so that he may not profane his offspring among his people; for I, Jehovah, am the one who sanctifies them. Unlike the impostors, who worship the same ancient Roman gods — Mars, the Sun, Artemis, Jupiter — but through almost identical statues and under other names, the true saints considered finding a good wife a blessing: Proverbs 18:22 – He who finds a wife finds a good thing, and obtains favor from Jehovah. The Bible contradicts the Bible because Rome contradicted the religion it persecuted and changed many things, calling much of what was good the “Old Testament” and its Hellenism the “New Testament.” The justified “eye for an eye” they replaced with “offer the other eye to your enemy,” for the enemy never changed; he merely disguised himself as a saint through names that were never his. Psalm 118:18–20 18 Jehovah has chastened me severely, but He has not given me over to death. 19 Open to me the gates of righteousness; I will enter through them and praise Jehovah. 20 This is the gate of Jehovah; the righteous shall enter through it.
The dragon says: “Political power comes from the barrel of a gun.”, The man answers: “It is reasoned words that make man use weapons, weapons are not used without human orders, and humans are convinced to use their weapons with words, words must be considered weapons, the power of words creates weapons and generates use, the power of words is superior to the power of weapons!”
The resurrection of Jesus is the story of an arrogant empire that did not respect God – The Roman Empire. Reasons to deny the resurrection of Jesus, reasons not to believe in the Bible.
There are surface contradictions and substantive contradictions in the Bible.
Surface contradictions are mutually exclusive ways of telling a main lie, a lie that can be destroyed by analyzing the substantive contradictions that are woven around it in order to safeguard it from the analytical and rational eye.
Surface contradictions are a Roman strategy deliberately put into the Bible and in the apocrypha, such as the Gospel of Thomas, or the Gospel of Philip, which I call false gospels banned because they contain some of the same lies that are in the Bible, they are deceptions created to distract from the substantive contradictions and to try to make the dogmatic lies go unnoticed.
There are many people who have no interest in analyzing the dogmatic bases of their faith, people who do not want to reason or question because they find it very difficult to do so, these are people who are content to say “yes” to whatever is popular.
I like logic, as an amateur programmer, I like intelligence and I hate the cunning of those who want to scam many, those who arrogantly thought that we were all stupid and that nothing and no one at all could destroy all their tricks, that is why I enjoy doing this, I enjoy destroying the lies of those frauds, I imagine the angry face of the religious scammers when reading this and running out of arguments, that inspires me, it also inspires me to help other analytical beings who only need the correct information to make use of their analytical power, they do not need the junk information given to the masses by the successors of the Roman persecutors.
These charlatans and irrational people can only be confused by the present analysis, which is why they get irritated, because they feel frustrated at not being able to understand me, it is as if you were to speak to a monkey who was expecting you to communicate with him through gestures, with words, words that a man, and not an ape, would understand, then the ape gets irritated because it cannot understand you, it thinks you are making fun of him, but when you give the same message to a human being, the human being thanks you for the information, because he can understand the message.
I speak with affection as a human being to other human beings, I do not care if the apes get irritated, to the beings who love coherence, these thoughts that I express seem harmonious, brave and revealing.
The ape says: “Political power comes from the barrel of a gun.”
The man answers: “It is reasoned words that make man use weapons, weapons are not used without human orders, and humans are convinced to use their weapons with words, words must be considered weapons, the power of words creates weapons and generates use, the power of words is superior to the power of weapons!”
Revelation 19:15 Out of his mouth comes a sharp sword, with which to strike down the nations, and he will rule them with a rod of iron; and he treads the winepress of the fury and wrath of Almighty God. 16 And on his robe and on his thigh he has a name written: KING OF KINGS AND LORD OF LORDS.
In the case of the resurrection, the superficial contradictions are, for example, the number of angels that were present when they went to see the tomb. It is understood that they are talking about the total number of angels. One gospel says that there was one, another says that there were two. Those who argue that the Bible has no contradictions say that since there are two ones in two, there is no contradiction, because when a version says two, it gives complementary information. I don’t see it that way, because obviously the narrator thinks: “I’ll say what I saw.” If he sees two men, the narrator is going to say “I saw two men,” he is not going to say “I saw a man.” Those who argue that, don’t think that we are all satisfied with that explanation, don’t think that all of us who deny the resurrection are atheists. I am not an atheist, and I have arguments that deny the underlying contradictions. I no longer let myself be distracted by the contradictions of the shell as it happened to me when I was just beginning to investigate the dogmas of the Bible, and my arguments are here:
Debunking False Doctrines and Invented Stories made up by the Roman Empire: Jesus’ Resurrection, and His Preaching to Love Our Enemies.
In the prophecies that Christ believed in, there no love for the enemies, only love for the friends. The prophecy in Psalm 118 is referenced by the message in Matthew 21:33-44 read both and notice yourself that the love for enemies is one of the Roman counterfeits against His words and the words of other men who loved justice, especially if you read Revelation 6:9-10, you will notice that the saints don’t love their enemies, which is inconsistent with them preaching the contrary, Acts 7: 60 is also inconsistent with Revelation 6:9-10 and the prophecy in Psalms 58:10 that states that the righteous will be happy, but only once they are avenged, which is compatible with the eye for an eye doctrine, but is inconsistent with impunity against the wicked preached in Genesis 4:15, and this shows that the Roman fraud also reached the texts they called “the books of the old testament of the Bible”, that explains the contradictions: Between Genesis 17:11(2 Maccabees 6) and Leviticus 19:28 (Philippians 3:2) (I do not defend circumcision), or the contradictions among Daniel 12: 10 (Revelation 13:10), Psalms 135: 6, Ezekiel 33: 1, Proverbs 16: 4 (Revelation 20:15), Ezekiel 18: 23-24 and Revelation 22: 11. You were told that Jesus was resurrected in Romans 8:11, and that He will return from the clouds of heaven according to Acts 1:11. But those claims are false, because Jesus did not rise again, and the return of Jesus and the other saints is through the being born again (The reincarnation to a second life), in concordance to Hebrews 9:27, Hosea 6:1-3, Daniel 12:2, Matthew 21:33-43, and Psalm 118.
The Roman Empire desecrated the Sabbath with the excuse that Jesus was resurrected on Sunday, which is also not true. They have even lied about it because Jesus was never resurrected on the third day, since in the parable of the wicked tenants in Matthew 21: 33-44, Jesus himself makes reference to a prophecy relating to his return, that prophecy is found in Psalm 118:5-25, and the events narrated there are not only incompatible with love for the enemies doctrine, they are also incompatible with the experiences that a man descending from heaven among the clouds would have; Micah 7:1-10, Psalms 118:1-24 and Psalms 41 speak of the same: He lives on earth and is punished by God because God wants to have him realized that he made unwilling sins, he sins because he is ignorant because he reincarnates with no memories of the knowledge that he had in his past life, and he reincarnates (he is born again in a new body), in the third millennium after his death on the cross (Psalm 22:16-18, Hosea 6:1-3).
Published by Jose Galindo ( https://ellameencontrara.com/2023/07/01/acerca-de-mi-jose-carlos-galindo-hinostroza/ )
Amo a mi prójimo como a mi mismo, pero no todos son mi prójimo, mi prójimo son los justos, si todos fuesen el prójimo, nadie habría asesinado a los santos, ni nadie hubiese escondido sus palabras, ni nadie hubiese falsificado las palabras de los santos, ni yo tendría ninguna necesidad de hacer este juicio justo a favor de mi prójimo y en perjuicio de nuestros enemigos, pues nadie hubiese calumniado contra mi como lo hacen los enemigos de mi prójimo, es que no es lo mismo oveja que lobo, aunque la oveja este desorientada o descarriada por su ignorancia, oveja es y el pastor desea salvarla, en cambio el lobo, aunque se vista de oveja, lobo sigue siendo y no puede convertirse jamás en oveja, el buen pastor no solo apacienta a las ovejas, él tambien caza a los lobos, como lobos son los calumiadores, los lobos del imperio romano, que tienen por madre de los fundadores de Roma, no de casualidad, a una loba. Esos son los que han calumniado contra los santos, y ellos son los grandes perdedores en el juicio final, es que el juicio final no perjudica a todos ni beneficia a todos, por eso muchos conspiraron contra el juicio final pues saben por su asquerosa conciencia que lo que hacen es injusto. https://gabriels.work/2024/09/17/el-abogado-de-los-secuestradores-argumenta-con-argumentos-religiosos-no-exijan-lo-que-es-suyo-y-amen-a-sus-enemigos-lucas-1630-a-todo-el-que-te-pida-dale-y-al-que-tome-lo-que-es-tuyo-no-se-lo-r/
I love my neighbor as myself, but not everyone is my neighbor, my neighbor is the righteous, if everyone were my neighbor, no one would have murdered the saints, nor would anyone have hidden their words, nor would anyone have falsified the words of the saints, nor would I have any need to make this just judgment in favor of my neighbor and to the detriment of our enemies, because no one would have slandered me as my neighbor's enemies do, because sheep and wolf are not the same, although the sheep is disoriented or led astray by its ignorance, it is a sheep and the shepherd wants to save it, on the other hand the wolf, even if he dresses as a sheep, is still a wolf and can never become a sheep, the good shepherd not only feeds the sheep, he also hunts wolves, as wolves are the slanderers, the wolves of the Roman Empire, whose mother of the founders of Rome, not by chance, is a she-wolf. Those are the ones who have slandered the saints, and they are the great losers in the final judgment, it is that the final judgment does not harm everyone nor benefit everyone, that is why many conspired against the final judgment because they know through their disgusting conscience that what they do is unjust. https://ntiend.me/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/the-book-of-life-revelations-el-libro-de-la-vida-revelaciones.docx - https://itwillbedotme.files.wordpress.com/2023/09/death-penalty-in-justice-is-a-need-to-clean-the-world-from-the-curse.docx – https://itwillbedotme.files.wordpress.com/2023/09/this-is-satan-and-these-are-his-religions.docx
View all posts by Jose Galindo ( https://ellameencontrara.com/2023/07/01/acerca-de-mi-jose-carlos-galindo-hinostroza/ )